Showing posts with label Sermon on I John. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sermon on I John. Show all posts

Sunday, May 10, 2015

I John 5:1-6


Year B
Sixth Sunday of Easter
May 10, 2015
Cross~Wind
Title: A Coach Through Stress

Going deeper

The theme of I John 4:7-5:4a is loving one another. In 3:23, John makes the statement that believers need to believe and to love.  4:1-6 is an elaboration of what it means to believe.  The opening verses conclude the segment on what it means to love. Barth says that if love is of God, then God can make of those who cannot and will not love people who actually love.[1]

            1 Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ has been born of God, and everyone who loves the parent loves the child. [The Johannine literature has a strong preference for speaking in terms of the action “believe” (the Greek verb pisteuw) rather than the idea of “faith” (the Greek noun pistV), and the action of believing is best identified with keeping God’s command to show love for one another (cf. 1 John 3:23 and 5:2-3). Thus, belief is  immensely practical and pragmatic. What they are to believe is that Jesus as the Christ has been born of God. Around the time the Johannine letters were written there was beginning to emerge an idea among some Christian thinkers that would eventually become known as “Docetism.” The term is derived from the Greek verb dokew which means “to seem,” and it designates the idea that the Christ just “seemed” to be human but was in fact only and completely divine; he was a fully spiritual being who took on the outward appearance of physicality without taking on any genuine physical attributes. The teaching of the Johannine community was adamantly opposed to this way of thinking about the Christ who “has been born of God” the Father (v. 1; cf. John 1:18). This idea that Jesus was “born” of the Father is foundational to their thought. The God who is spirit (John 4:24) has nevertheless brought to birth a son who has genuinely become physical in nature (John 1:14). That is why this author opens the letter with the insistence that they had not only “heard” but also “seen with our eyes … and touched with our hands” this “word of life” who had taken on human flesh (1 John 1:1). Anyone who should teach otherwise is not only a “liar” but also the very antithesis of Christ himself, an antichrist (2:22). Thus, the phrase explores what Christian teaching would call the two natures theory of Christ. The issue is not whether Jesus was the Messiah or perhaps someone else might be the Messiah. The issue was whether one believed that the human being Jesus of Nazareth was indeed the Christ who was born of God. If one believed that the spiritual Christ was identical with the human Jesus, then one would understand the necessity of relating the spiritual and physical realms. Notice as well that this opening verse makes it clear that the Christ is not the only one who “has been born of God.” All those who “believe” — that is, act in accord with this truth — that the human Jesus is the Christ are likewise “born of God.” Naturally, such children who have been so born will not only love the parent who has given them birth but also all those likewise born — both the Christ and those born of God by their belief in the Christ.]2 By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God and obey [suggests that specific actions are required on the part of those to whom the author of the epistle is writing] his commandments. [Love of God is inherently linked with keeping God’s commands to love others because God has shown by giving birth to the Christ that the spiritual and physical are inherently linked.] 3 For the love of God is this, that we obey ("keep," thrwmen), his commandments. And his commandments are not burdensome, 4 for whatever is born of God conquers the world.

            Why did the mutiny occur? No one can know for sure. It is probable, however, that the split happened at least in part concerning the issue of the identity of Jesus Christ.

The theme of I John 5:4b-12 is faith as conqueror. And this is the victory that conquers the world, our faith. [We find here one of the rare moments when John refers to “the faith” rather than the act of believing. Even in this single use of the noun “faith” within this literature the emphasis remains on what it does, namely, “conquers the world.” Clearly then the “victory” is achieved not by an idea that “conquers the world” but rather by the actions of those who obey God’s commands to show love not only toward God but all those who “have been born of God.”] 5 Who is it that conquers the world but the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God? [Although one might expect the conqueror to possess superior strength or courage, the epistle here claims that the only requirement is belief. As long as such belief recognizes Jesus as the Son of God, the power to conquer is available. This is an extraordinary claim indeed. When heard within the context of an empire that conquered the world through brute force, military might and the occupation of conquered territories, the epistle's claim that the only "weapon" one needs for this task is the belief that Jesus is the Son of God is a radical assertion.] 6 This is the one who came by water and blood, Jesus Christ, not with the water only but with the water and the blood.[The statement has received much discussion. It could refer to John 19:34-35, where water and blood came from the side of Jesus, indicating his quite real death. He did not just appear to die, as some persons would affirm, including Muslims. Yet, John is often thinking at a symbolic level. Thus, the public ministry of Jesus in his Gospel is with baptism with water by John the Baptist, and it ends with the blood of the cross. These are two strong witnesses to who Jesus is. The church came to symbolize that witness in baptism and the celebration of the Lord’s Supper. These two acts remind us that the presence of Christ among us is precisely what the church is all about. And the Spirit is the one that testifies, for the Spirit is the truth. [That testimony continued to be given through the Beloved Disciple and the Spirit. The third witness, identified as part of God's divine testimony, the Spirit, is in fact the witness‑bearer ‑‑ the one who translates for us the meaning behind the water of baptism and the blood of the crucifixion. The Spirit "is the one that testifies" ‑‑ an ongoing identity ‑‑ forever keeping the historical evidence of the water and the blood intelligible to each new generation of believers.] 

Introduction

Today, I am thinking about the voice in the head that guides you in your reflections on what to do with your life. Let us call it your internal coach.

Such a coach is often the voice of your parents.

On the humorous side, on this Mother's Day, we remember the things our mamas taught us. They were not only the voices in our heads, but around the kitchen table, the living room, just about everywhere. 

- My mama taught me logic: "Because I said so, that's why."
- My mama taught me osmosis: "Shut your mouth and eat your supper!"
- My mama taught me about envy: "There are millions of less fortunate children in this world who don't have wonderful parents like you do."
- My mama taught me about anticipation: "Just wait until you get home."

            However, the most important thing mom taught me was the importance of Jesus and the church. She made sure that the five of us went to church in Austin, MN. She kept asking questions about her Bible reading over the years I was a student in college, Seminary, and as a pastor.

Sometimes, the voice might tell you other things, and they may not come from parents.  If a voice tells you to sell everything you own, get on a plane, go to Vegas, and put all your money on Black 9, please do not listen.

Julie Bell is a psychologist who has the image of a coaching voice in our heads. Some people have a strong voice, and some people need help developing that inner voice.

The story is told of the late Fred Rogers (of 'Mister Rogers' fame), a Presbyterian pastor, that he was addressing the National Press Club. He said that he knew that the room was filled with many of the nation's best reporters -- men and women who had achieved much in their lives. Rogers took out his pocket watch and announced that he was going to keep two minutes of silence. He invited everybody in the room to remember the people from their past --parents, teachers, coaches, friends and others -- who had made it possible for them to reach this point. As the seconds ticked away, he could hear, all around the room, people sniffling as they were moved by the memories of those, coaches if you will, who had made sacrifices on their behalf and who had given them countless gifts, the voice of wisdom and encouragement. The same could be said for our own journeys of faith. 

Application

One of the greatest coaches of the first-century church was the apostle John, the author of three New Testament letters and the Gospel of John. His writings have touched many of us deeply and profoundly. They have done so for centuries.  

Love

In his first epistle, he says to his fellow Christians, "the love of God is this, that we obey his commandments" (1 John 5:3). Here is where our focus needs to be, rather than what our culture might entice us to focus upon.

Coach John begins with love. "Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ has been born of God, and everyone who loves the parent loves the child" (v. 1). Here is a graphic way of saying it. One born of God has God as their parent, and if you have God as your parent, you love the children of God. Each of us is a member of the large and loving family of God.

Nevertheless, this love is no mere warm and wonderful feeling -- it is an attitude that requires us to be intentional with our thinking and our acting. "By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God and obey his commandments" (v. 2). The visible proof of our love for the children of God is that we not simply love God, but that we obey his commandments. Love-talk is empty without love-action -- action that includes determined commandment-keeping. 

Obedience

John's second coaching point is obey. Athletes understand this, whether they are pros or weekend warriors -- to put in a good performance, you have to obey your coach. In the year 2000, a Catholic priest challenged Homiletics contributor Henry Brinton to run the Marine Corps Marathon. Henry thought he was crazy, since he had no experience as a runner, and the prospect of 26.2 miles was daunting. However, Henry needed a midlife challenge. His priest friend had run several marathons, so he coached him to run and walk, run and walk, run and walk ... one hour at a time ... three times a week.

The first time Henry hit the road, he ran for three minutes and had to stop, gasping for breath. However, after walking for seven minutes, he was able to run for another three, and then he walked another seven and ran three. Over several weeks, his running increased and his walking decreased until he could run for an hour. And then he ran two hours. "If you can run two hours, you can run four hours," the priest-coach said. "If you can run four hours, you can do a marathon."

The coach was right. Six months after beginning his training, Henry finished the Marine Corps Marathon in a respectable four hours, 12 minutes.

Because Henry obeyed his coach's commandments, he fell in love with running, and seven years later found a way to use his running to show love for the children of God. In 2007, he became part of a team of 50 marathoners raising money for 25:40, an organization helping to fight AIDS in South Africa.

Suddenly, Henry's running took on much deeper significance. As he hit the road for long training runs, he thought of Lithemba, a 5-year-old South African boy with AIDS. Henry was raising money to support the clinic that treats Lithemba and pays the salary of AIDS monitors -- native South Africans trained in HIV/AIDS care and prevention. When Henry felt exhausted at the halfway mark, he thought of the weariness brought on by a life-threatening disease. When he struggled to make it to his next water stop, he wondered what it would be like to face real thirst: In rural South Africa, five million people lack clean drinking water. 

Making possible the impossible 

Love-talk is empty without love-action. What is true in long-distance running is equally true in the practice of the Christian faith. "For the love of God is this, that we obey his commandments" (v. 3).

Of course, we will stumble, fall, wander, and struggle. At times, after we hit the road, we will feel exhausted.

However, here is the promise of Coach John: If we keep getting up and moving forward: Victory. God's commandments may be difficult, but they are not meant to be onerous. Instead, they are designed to help us do our best and succeed as children of God, "for whatever is born of God conquers the world" (v. 4). John tells us that the God who loves us has set us up for success: He gives us a Son to believe in, a family of fellow children of God to love and a set of commandments to follow.

All of these gifts enable us to persevere when life starts to drag us down -- they are part of "the victory that conquers the world, our faith" (v. 4). The circumstances that drag us down can make us forget that Christian voice that if we base our lives on the belief that Jesus is the Son of a truly loving God, then we are going to be victorious in the face of any challenges. This does not mean that we will not experience failures, tragedies, disappointments and disasters, but it does mean, in the words of the apostle Paul, that "we are more than conquerors through him who loved us" (Romans 8:37). No matter what the world throws at us, nothing "will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord" (v. 39).

We may stumble across the finish line, bruised and bloodied. However, with the help of God, we will be victorious. 

Suffering for us

John concludes his coaching by pointing to the example of Jesus himself. Jesus is "the one who came by water and blood, not with the water only but with the water and the blood" (v. 6). A mysterious verse, for sure, one that can leave you wondering. Nevertheless, John seems to be reminding us that Jesus suffered in this life -- he experienced not only the water of baptism, but also the blood of crucifixion. His victory involved pain and agony, and ours will as well. 

Conclusion

In the face of life's challenges, Coach John tells us to make our thoughts obedient to Christ. This means focusing on the love of God, obeying his commandments and expecting to be victorious over the world. Remember, "whatever is born of God conquers the world" (v. 4).

That is the coaching voice, the voice in your head. Listen to it.




[1] Church Dogmatics IV.2 [68.2] 776-7.

Monday, April 27, 2015

I John 3:16-24


Year B
Fourth Sunday of Easter
April 26, 2015
Title: Love One Another: Not the Same Old Formula
Cross~Wind UMC 

Going deeper
I John 3:16-24
The theme for I John 3:11- 24 is the gospel of loving one another. The contrast is between love and hate. He shows the importance of love among the fellowship of believers. The primary contrast is between showing love on the one hand and hate or apathy on the other. The great pattern is Jesus, who laid down his life for the believer. Thus, the great command given to believers is to believe in Jesus and to love each other. People show this love in actions, especially by giving to those in need. On the other hand, hate, or apathy, brings death, sin, and evil and shows no mercy to people. 

16 We know love by this, that he laid down his life for us [focusing on the positive example of Christ. Note that the death is “for us.” That privilege is the basis for obligation. Christians receive life from an act of love, so the life in them expresses itself in love.]-- and we ought to lay down our lives for one another.[One can understand these verses as a reflection on John 15:13-15, where on the night before his crucifixion Jesus is portrayed as telling his disciples that their relationship to one another is the binding love between friends, and that “no one has greater love than … to lay down one’s life for one’s friends.” Certainly within that narrative context, “laying down one’s life” for another is quite direct and literal, and it is that self-sacrificial act that the letter refers to when it says simply, “he laid down his life for us” (1 John 3:16). Does it follow, then, that the recipients are likewise literally to sacrifice their lives in response to their obligation to “lay down [their] lives for one another”? Without denying the possibility that such circumstances might arise, this letter makes it clear that such literal self-sacrifice is not the primary moral obligation in view. Nor is it content to permit an abstract “willingness” to act in such a way under extreme circumstances to suffice. The giving of one’s life for others is defined as the compassionate offer of oneself and one’s possessions to other members of the community of faith. So obvious is this obligation to the author of the letter that he is dumbfounded by the very thought that anyone might claim to have God’s love within her or himself and fail to meet others’ needs.] 17 How does God's love abide in anyone who has the world's goods and sees a brother or sister in need and yet refuses help?[The specific concern for the poor is part of the Jewish heritage. The observation suggests those who left were the wealthy ones. The secessionists may have wondered if their poverty would drive them to the secession. The clause translated as “refuses help” would literally be rendered as “closes off his compassion” (klesh ta splagcna autou), using the standard Greek idiom of the “bowels” (splagcna) as the seat of the emotions and acts of compassion (in the way we in English now speak of the “heart”). Without giving way to the etymological fallacy in such a well-established idiom, the image nevertheless suggests the idea of hoarding within oneself the love received from God in the forms of the material things necessary for life (bion tou kosmou). If God’s love properly “abides” (menei) in us it will not remain there closed off from others, but instead, having been nourished and transformed by God’s love we will act with compassion toward others in need. One also needs to admit that within the language of the Johannine literature this obligation is restricted to the ways one is to act toward other members of the faith community, one’s “brother or sister” (ton adeljon). Similarly limited calls for sharing one’s material possessions with fellow Christians can be found elsewhere in the New Testament (cf. Acts 4:34-35; James 2:15-16). Indeed, a proven effective means of evangelization is compassionate sharing of our possessions with those in need when it is at the same time made clear that these charitable acts arise not from ourselves but from the love of God that abides in us.]

Verses 18-22 have the theme of assurance before of God of those who belong to the truth.18 Little children, let us love, not in word or speech, but in truth and action. [The point is not just sincerity versus hypocrisy, but that claiming to belong to the truth manifests itself in deeds of love, not in hate. Nor is it the case that the only ones who benefit from such acts of compassion are the recipients of the charity. By demonstrating love not only by “words” but also by “actions”, we prove to ourselves as well as to others that our relationship with God has transformed us. Much more is at stake than just a warm, fuzzy feeling about ourselves and God’s love for us.] 19 And by this we will know that we are from the truth and will reassure our hearts before him 20 whenever our hearts condemn us; for God is greater than our hearts, and he knows everything. [When the text speaks of “reassuring our hearts” (kardian) or conversely being “condemned” by them, it is using the language of knowledge and proof. The “heart” in Greek idiom was the seat of the intellect and not the emotions. That is why the proper parallel with “God is greater than our hearts” is that “God knows everything”; in each instance, what is at stake is knowledge about us. Knowledge of the truth can help us in two cases. One in that our hearts condemn us with some sin, and yet God knows it all and forgives. Two, it gives assurance where our hearts are free of sin. This thought is similar to that of 2:2. This may have been necessary because secessionists would have cast doubts.] 21 Beloved, if our hearts do not condemn us, we have boldness before God; 22 and we receive from him whatever we ask, because we obey his commandments and do what pleases him. [Thus, there should be no uncertainty about our relationship with God if our actions accord with God’s will (“obey his commandments”) and arise from a loving, mutual relationship with God (“do what pleases him,”). This knowledge provides not only the “boldness” to ask God for what we need but also forms the substance of those requests in keeping with what will be pleasing to God. God is so gracious toward those who struggle with the sin that God gives whatever they ask. The text does not suggest merit, in answering prayers. It is part of the covenant relationship.]

Verses 23-24 have the theme of the commandment to believe and love. 23 And this is his commandment, that we should believe in the name of his Son Jesus Christ and love one another, just as he has commanded us. [The commandment from God is to believe in the name of the Son, Jesus Christ, and love each other. People who obey the commandments abide in God, and God abides in them. Further, we know that God abides in us by the Spirit that God has given us. The text continues the comment from verse 22 on John 16:26-27. Belief in the Gospel is a work, shaped in controversy, because of the necessity of public confession. The double commandment is similar to the synoptic tradition of  the two great commandments. Although the words usually trip easily off our tongues, understanding the precise nuance of the command to “believe in the name of his Son Jesus Christ” is difficult to pin down. The usual meaning of an action done “in the name of …” in Greek idiom is that of an attendant circumstance (“with mention of,” “while calling the name of …”). Surely, however, something more is at stake than just speaking Jesus’ name in a statement of what one believes. Equally unsatisfying is that it is nothing more than a formulaic means of identifying the object of one’s belief and trust. Would not direct use of the name itself (“believe in Jesus Christ”) better express the relational aspect of that trust? A better possible understanding of the expression would be its use to indicate an effect accomplished by uttering the name. The ability to believe is itself a consequence of calling on “the name” of Jesus Christ, who is then in some sense both the source and the object of that trust. It is precisely this idea of the mutuality of trust and loving action between the believer and Christ that forms the conclusion.] 24 All who obey his commandments abide in him, and he abides in them. And by this we know that he abides in us, by the Spirit that he has given us. That the commandment is not legalistic becomes clear in that “abiding” is so intimate. Commandment and Spirit are together. Note love in John 13:34 and Spirit in 14:15-17, 25-26. The New Testament often has Spirit as a pledge or criterion. Here, the thought is consistent with 4:2; the Spirit is the one who brings true public testimony about Jesus. Just as God has made Christ to abide within us through the gift of the Spirit, so also we abide in Christ as well through the gift of loving actions toward others in response to God’s command. Barth says that abiding in John is a way of being, not just an experience we have, nor a disposition. We have our truest reality in abiding, in which we are to see and understand ourselves in truth. We are to remain who we are. We are in Him of whom we have heard. We are really in Him.[1] 

Introduction

Not the same old formula.

In recent years, companies have learned how dangerous it is to change the ingredients of a successful brand. Exactly 30 years ago, in April 1985, Coca-Cola changed its formula and introduced a product called "New Coke." The response was overwhelmingly negative, and within three months, the original formula was back on the market.

Just how bad was it? The company hotline received 1,500 calls a day, almost four times what they usually logged. Psychiatrists listened in on calls and heard people talking as though they were grieving the death of a family member.

Southerners saw the change through the lens of the Civil War, describing it as yet another surrender to the Yankees. Even Fidel Castro despised New Coke, reportedly calling it "a sign of American capitalist decadence."

Bottom line: Be careful when you change a successful brand. You might end up breaking something that does not need fixing.

Oddly enough, Coke has decided to change its formula once again, offering a new version called "Coca-Cola Life." It was launched in Argentina before being test-marketed in the United Kingdom, and came to the United States in September 2014. People are wondering if it is healthier than regular Coke, since its formula contains a sweetener from natural sources. "Coca-Cola Life" will get its sweetness from sugar and stevia, which is derived from a plant in the chrysanthemum family. Instead of regular Coke's 140 calories per can, Life will have 89.

It competes with Pepsi True, also made with stevia.

Coca-Cola has started offering Life. Here is what one person ponders about the new Coke. 

For a moment, imagine the marketing meeting that must have taken place when they decided on the branding of this new product. Was there not anybody in that room who thought that naming it Coca-Cola Life was a terrible idea? What does that make normal Coca-Cola with its normal amount of sugar — Coca-Cola Death?[2] 

Application

            One of the issues facing John is that people claimed to have a form of faith or belief, but did not have corresponding actions that testified to that belief. I want us to explore that issue with John for a moment.

            First, let us consider the old formula.

"You shall love your neighbor as yourself" (Leviticus 19:18). That is what God said to Moses and the people of Israel.

As far as formulas go, it is terrific. For thousands of years, it has worked well in a variety of forms in most of the world's religions. Jews believe that "you shall love your neighbor as yourself." Hindus affirm that "one should not behave toward others in a way which is disagreeable to oneself." Buddhists say that you should "hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful." Muslims believe that "no one of you is a believer until he desires for his brother that which he desires for himself." (--Hadith of an-Nawawi 13)

There is nothing secret about this formula. Even Jesus endorsed it when he made it a part of his great commandment. "Love the Lord your God," said Jesus, and "love your neighbor as yourself" (Matthew 22:37, 39).

Surprisingly, in the first of his New Testament letters, the apostle John offers a new recipe: "this is [God's] commandment, that we should believe in the name of his Son Jesus Christ and love one another" (v. 23).

Believe in Jesus. Love one another.

Not the same old formula. 

            Second, let us consider the new formula.
So what is the apostle John up to?

For starters, he wants to put a human face on the commandment to love one another — the face of Jesus Christ. "We know love by this, that he laid down his life for us" (v. 16). John knows that the problem with the love commandment is that it can easily become sickeningly sweet, with people enjoying the pleasant taste of tender emotions and charitable thoughts. So he changes the formula to include the bitter sacrifice of Christ on the cross.

Such a change of ingredients can actually change our behavior. "We ought to lay down our lives for one another," (v. 16) insists John, following the example of Jesus. Under this new formula, sacrificial giving becomes a central part of the Christian life, one that simply cannot be denied. John asks his followers, "How does God's love abide in anyone who has the world's goods and sees a brother or sister in need and yet refuses to help?" (v. 17).

Good question. Where do you see God's love in such a person? You do not. It is just not there. Love is seen in action, not in words.

We love in action when we give our time. One of the greatest gifts we give to each other is time. When you give a spouse, a parent, a child, a friend, or a stranger, your time, you have given something you cannot get back. That time is gone. We need to treasure the gift of time as those who receive this gift from others. In fact, we see it around here, in funeral dinners, in people who set up this room, in people who volunteer for Upward Soccer. We see people willingly sacrificing time for others, setting aside time they could have used on themselves.

We see love in action as people give generously of their treasure. People enable this congregation to make disciples for Jesus Christ to transform the world when they regularly give to the ministries of this congregation. People help us fulfill the vision of helping people believe in Christ, grow in their faith, and go into the world to love as Jesus loved, as we give of our treasure.

John summarizes his new formula with the words "Believe in the name of [God's] Son Jesus Christ and love one another" (v. 23). He links belief in Jesus with love for one another, knowing that the clearest example of love is the sacrificial life and death of Christ. The result of this new formula is a close connection to God, one in which "all who obey his commandments abide in him, and he abides in them" (v. 24). John says that we will know that God lives in us "by the Spirit that he has given us" (v. 24).

The new link between belief and love create a new kind of life for us.
Christ Life.

Third, Jesus Christ has been offering Life for quite some time.

Throughout the gospel of John, we hear the promise of life. In fact, the gospel was written "so that you may come to believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that through believing you may have life" (John 20:31). The gospel begins with the Word of God taking the human form of Jesus, and we're promised that "what has come into being in him was life, and the life was the light of all people" (John 1:3-4).

Belief. Life. Light. Put these ingredients together, and you can see that a new formula is beginning to emerge.

John goes on to tell us that "God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life" (John 3:16).

So now love is in the mix. As well a kind of life that extends beyond the grave — eternal life.

Describing himself, Jesus says, "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness but will have the light of life" (John 8:12). "I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly" (John 10:10). "I am the way, and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me" (John 14:6). 

- Life in his name.
- Eternal life.
- The light of life.
- Abundant life.
- The way, the truth and the life.
- Life, life, life.  

Conclusion
Christ Life is what you want. Coca-Cola Life, not so much.

You can have that life as you believe in the Son and love one another, all of which will lead to the close connection with God. You will have nothing to lose, and a new life to gain.  

Sermon to go
Key points

            First, let us consider the old formula.

"You shall love your neighbor as yourself" (Leviticus 19:18)

Hindus affirm that "one should not behave toward others in a way which is disagreeable to oneself." Buddhists say that you should "hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful." And Muslims believe that "no one of you is a believer until he desires for his brother that which he desires for himself." (--Hadith of an-Nawawi 13)

"this is [God's] commandment, that we should believe in the name of his Son Jesus Christ and love one another" (I John 3: 23). 

            Second, let us consider the new formula.

"We know love by this, that he laid down his life for us" (v. 16)

"We ought to lay down our lives for one another," (v. 16)

"How does God's love abide in anyone who has the world's goods and sees a brother or sister in need and yet refuses to help?" (v. 17)

"Believe in the name of [God's] Son Jesus Christ and love one another" (v. 23)

"all who obey his commandments abide in him, and he abides in them" (v. 24)

"by the Spirit that he has given us" (v. 24) 

Third, Jesus Christ has been offering Life for quite some time.

the gospel was written "so that you may come to believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that through believing you may have life" (John 20:31)

we're promised that "what has come into being in him was life, and the life was the light of all people" (John 1:3-4).

"God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life" (John 3:16).

Jesus says, "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness but will have the light of life" (John 8:12). "I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly" (John 10:10). "I am the way, and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me" (John 14:6).  

Ideas for exploration

1. In Acts 4:5-12 we have the story of Peter, in which he stresses that there is salvation in no one else but in Jesus Christ, who God raised from the dead.

2. Note the new formula of “love one another” shifts in I John 3:16-24.

3. John 10:11-18, where Jesus is the good shepherd who lays down his life for the sheep. 

Let’s Live It!
Psalm 23:2-3a
2 He makes me lie down in green pastures;
he leads me beside still waters;
3 he restores my soul. 

            This week, stay in touch with the source of our love for each other, namely, the love of God for us. Let awareness of that love restore your soul. Let the restoration flow into your relationships with other people.




[1] Church Dogmaitcs IV.2 [64.4] 276.
[2] Gary Bainbridge, "Coca Cola Life, and why you can't have it both ways," Mirror, October 9, 2014, mirror.co.uk.

Sunday, April 19, 2015

I John 3:17


Scripture:                                   I John 3: 1 – 7
Year B
Third Sunday of Easter
April 17, 2015
Cross~Wind UMC
Title: Character of the Children of God 

Going deeper

I John 3:1-7

I John 2:28-3:10 has the theme of the children of God versus the children of devil. There is an inclusion at 2:28-29 and 3:9-10, meaning that these two verses intentionally mark off a section. Nine statements begin “Everyone who …” Here, the theme is that of contrasting the children of God with the children of the Devil based on their behavior, whether their behavior is just or sinful, which is adding to the previous Christological covering.

            In this segment, a very clear dualism between purity and lawlessness, salvation and sin, arises. Those who remain in Christ fulfill the law, become pure and do not sin. Those who remain in the realm of the devil are lawless and impure and will be punished. Those who are pure are self-evidently part of Christ and his beloved community. They are righteous because they do "what is right" (3:7). Those who sin are self-evidently, according to John, not part of Christ and his community. One may assume in these verses that by "sin" John means the willful and re-occurring acts of wrongdoing. However, John is not entirely clear on this point: Something cosmic is at stake in this passage. Obviously, the sin that John identifies was manifested when certain individuals left the community (2:19).

            By the time the reader comes to chapter 3, he or she might think this passage has already been read. It contains some of the same ideas — the future, sin, and righteous conduct — and the same words — o kosmoV, hamartiaand o menwn that appear in the previous chapters. Nevertheless, this passage has something unique to say about being a child of God and the effect that will have on one’s life.

In this letter, the enemy for John is no longer the unbelieving whether Jew or Gentile, but rather those who have abandoned the community. One cannot ascertain with complete certainty from the text the reason for the split; however, it is likely that the division occurred over the understanding of the true significance of Jesus (5:1).

Despite its ominous tone, the grace and power of the gospel is revealed in the promise that God's love is a gift given to us through Jesus Christ. Moreover, God's love forms community and orders the relationships between believers. It does reaffirm the promise that more is to be revealed to the believer who keeps the faith. Perhaps the most suggestive issue in the text for postmodern Christians is this: At what price community?

I John 3:1-3 has the theme of an exclamatory interruption. 1 See [John hopes to grab their attention with an imperative, 'Idete.] what love the Father has given us, that we should be called children of God; (tekna qeou) [They are children of God — not because of anything they have done, but because of God’s love for them.] [The secessionists may have argued that the insistence of the author on the unity of faith and works lowers the status of believers as children of God. He gets emotional about this declaring he would not deny the love of God or the dignity of the children of God. The assertion that through the love of God revealed in Jesus Christ the believer is called, and in fact becomes, a beloved child (3:1, 2) is a primary emphasis in the letters of Paul as well. This love of parent for child and child for parent bespeaks of intimacy, dependence and trust.] and that is what we are. The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him [the Father]. 2 Beloved, we are God's children now; what we will be has not yet been revealed. [It will not be a revelation of them as the children of God, but a new manifestation of the love that accomplished this. In reality, John turns to a reflection on time. Pannenberg offers this passage as an example of his point that on the path of their history in time objects and people exist only in anticipation of that which they will be in the light of their final future, the advent of God. The future of consummation is the entry of eternity into time. For it has the content that characterizes eternity but that is lost in the disintegration of time, namely, the totality of life and therefore also its true and definitive identity. For this reason, the eschatological future is the basis for the lasting essence of each creature that finds manifestation already in the allotted duration of its life and yet will achieve its full manifestation only in the eschatological future.[1] Pannenberg points out that now (nun) they are children of God. This might be a subtle reminder that prior to their conversion and entrance into the community; they were children of the world. If they have undergone a change from their previous life to their present existence, how much more will they change when Christ is revealed and they see him just as he is? This is an interesting assertion, in light of John’s account in chapter 1 that he tangibly experienced Jesus, presumably during his ministry. Now, he looks forward to seeing Jesus, “kaqwV estin,” just as he is, in the fullness of his glory.] What we do know [This suggests this is knowledge his adherents already possess. They know that in the time of revelation, they will be like God. They will see who God is.] is this: when he is revealed, we will be like him,[ Living as reflections of God’s love illumines another theme of this passage — that of being like Jesus and God.] for we will see him as he is. [One cannot help but be reminded of Paul’s metaphor of the dim glass compared with viewing face to face (1 Corinthians 13:12). Though the referent to what is revealed is ambiguous (it could be ti, esomeqa, what John and his readers will be), it seems most likely that it refers to Christ. Even though John cannot postulate the details, when Christ is revealed, John is sure that they will become like him. How will they be like Christ? Is John talking about a resurrected body or a deified state?] 3 And all who have this hope [“Hope” and using Christ as a pattern is part of initiation terminology.] in him purify [The call to purity is not new for God’s people. The “Holiness Code” (Leviticus 11:44-45; 19:2; 20:26; 21:8) calls the people to be holy just as God is holy. Jesus took this teaching and transformed it. Rather than imitating God’s holiness, we should be merciful as God is merciful (Matthew 18:24ff; Luke 6:35-36). If we belong to God, if we are children of God, then we are to be like the one whose children we are. To purify ourselves means we rid ourselves of actions and attitudes inappropriate for ones who have such an intimate relationship with Christ.]themselves, just as he is pure. The belief expressed here is shaped by the Johannine belief that the presence of God creates a new divine family among humans (2:29). The relation between present status and future revelation is subtle. Believers live in the love of God. The author states strongly that believers exist in the love of God and have the firm hope of a glorious future. Barth says the epiphany of Jesus Christ, the appearing of what has been done for us through Christ, the disclosure of our life with Him as eternal life, the appearing of what we are, has not yet taken place.[2] This suggests the resemblance between the believer and Christ will be in the realm of righteousness. To be a child of God is to begin a journey in the faith that will lead to a more profound knowledge of who Christ is, in his fullness. Furthermore, this journey will lead to a deeper, personal, moral purity; the believer will become like Jesus.

            Verses 4-6 have the theme of Parousia and sin. The author makes a strong contrast between the Son of God and the effects of his work in people, and the Devil and his work in people. Christ has no sin, of course, and the whole purpose of his coming is in taking away sin and destroying the work of the devil. The work of the devil is sin, defined as lawlessness and rebellion against God. Each person has a choice. Each person can do what is right, which means love, or sin and keep on sinning, without regard to its denial of the command of God to love. The greatest obstacle to meeting the Parousia with confidence is sin. The main point is that the person who sins and keeps on sinning, with no desire to confess or no sensitivity to the need for forgiveness. 4 Everyone who commits sin is guilty of lawlessness; sin is lawlessness. [The reference to purity in verse 3 leads John to a discussion of its opposite, sin. In this instance, he defines sin as lawlessness (anomia). It is possible that the community had too narrow a view of sin, and, though it is difficult to ascertain what John meant by the term anomia because he uses it nowhere else in the letter, it seems that he wants to assert that sin and lawlessness cannot be separated. One ought not to interpret John's use of the word "lawless" through the lens of the Pauline vocabulary. John does not seem to be talking here about the Jewish law. The lawlessness of which John speaks refers to the anarchy of which the devil and his followers - his "children" – partake. What the elder means by “sin” is unclear. In the gospel, sin is described as unbelief. In this verse, “lawlessness” (anomia), doing what is not right. The writer will note in verse 10 that sin is the failure to love one another. What is clear is that those who are righteous, those who are born of God, have no choice but to act in the way God acts, which means living lives that reflect God’s love..] 5 You know that he was revealed to take away sins, and in him there is no sin. [A textual addition present in some early (Sinaiticus and Ephraemi Syri Rescriptus) and most late manuscripts adds that Jesus came to take away our sins, but because of the textual evidence against it and John’s earlier assertion that Jesus came to take away the sin of the world (2:2), many think it seems an unnecessary limiting addition. The statement shows how this seemingly new topic is actually closely related to the previous discussion about the revelation of Christ. John reminds them of what they already know, namely that when Christ was revealed the first time he came to take away (airw) sin. He who was free of sin’s pollution came to remove it. It seems likely that the writer of the epistle takes up this term (airw) from the gospel of John (1:29, “the lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world”). Another theme in this passage, then, is one of revelation. Revelation is past, present and future. In the past, Christ was revealed to take away sins (v. 5). In the letters of John, this is the only use of airein (to take away) in reference to the removal of sins.]6 No one who abides in him sins [and keeps on sinning]; no one who sins [and keeps on sinning] has either seen him or known him. [The interpreter must be careful to notice, however, that John does not depart into an esoteric and theoretical discussion of atonement motifs. Instead, the direct result of the removal of sin is behavioral, namely that those who are in him do not sin. It is here that John’s writing seems to enter a war of contradiction with itself. In the first two chapters, John clearly states that if the readers deny they have sin, they deceive themselves. If they do sin (the assumption seems to be that they will), they can confess to God and trust Jesus as their advocate. Here, however, in chapter 3, John’s statement seems to be a direct rejection of the assurances of chapters 1 and 2. Not only do those in Christ not sin, but also those who do sin cannot have seen or known Christ. Scholars have postulated that John is trying to maintain a tight balance between some who claim to be perfect and some who continue to remain in sin. It might even be the same group of people — because they are perfect in Christ, their behavior is irrelevant. John asserts that Christians are not perfect, but they should strive to live as purely as possible. Linguistically, when John talks about sin as a mutually exclusive entity excluding one from being in Christ, he uses the present tense verb. Real Christians will make mistakes, but they will not live in a continual pattern of sin. Although John's vocabulary is a bit odd, his insistence, that those who abide in Jesus are saved from lawlessness, echoes other passages describing the new life in Christ which frees the believer from sin. Likewise, John warns that some so-called believers will backslide returning to their pre-grace sinfulness. They will reveal themselves to be "child of the devil" (3:8).]

Verses 7-10 have the theme of revelation of the children of God and the children of Devil.  The Gospel of John has statements suggesting sin was for non-believers and Jesus was the believer’s model. For secessionists, the divine begetting is a once and for all gift. For the author, it must be expressed in behavior.7 Little children, let no one deceive you. Everyone who does what is right is righteous, just as he is righteous. He reminds the readers that behavior is not a mystery. It is not the case that once a person has been joined to Christ all behavior, no matter what it looks like, is pure. He suggests quite the opposite. The one who does righteous acts shows him - or herself to be righteous, just as Jesus is righteous. Furthermore, this righteousness is not esoteric, but manifests itself in the love of the community. The author knows full well that folks who were once trusted can be the source of division. 

Introduction

I have been reflecting upon how notions of sin are changing.

The Middle Ages developed a list of seven sins that it classed as the worst possible kinds of sin.  These the seven deadly sins were Pride, Greed, Anger, Envy, Gluttony, Sloth (laziness), Unfaithfulness (adultery). Such a list makes us focus on attitude and ways of thinking, and not just actions.

Martin Luther yielded to our sinful nature and sighed, "Trust God and sin on bravely."  Augustine seemed to say something similar in an "anything goes" remark when he said a Christian should "love, and do what he wants."

A traditional hymn is, "The King of Love my Shepherd is."  I particularly love the verse that says,      

     Perverse and foolish oft I strayed, But yet in love He sought me,
     And on His shoulder gently laid, And home, rejoicing brought me. 

            Perhaps--like me--you have a past that includes sins of thought and action that you have come to realize were wrong.  And--also like me--you have found that God does willingly lay us on His shoulder and carry us home to the consciousness of His redeeming love. 

Application

All of this brings us to two essential, take-away ideas.

            First, people who are loved behave differently from those who are not.

            As I have reflected upon this, I might word this a bit differently. John 3:16 lets us know that God loves every person in the world, but the issue here is that all people do not know this. John reminds us that God loves us. We begin life loved by God.  Therefore, God calls us to love.  This affects our relationship with God and the community. We are to live by a different set of rules as followers of Jesus Christ than the rules by which we lived before we became Christians. We are to love our neighbors, listen to the voice of God, consider ourselves subject to each other, practice kindness and charity, bear the burdens of each other, and forgive. In summing up the Old Testament law in terms of loving God above all things and loving our neighbors as ourselves, Jesus clarified proper behavior and manners for us.

            Love is the message we have heard from the beginning. This is the message of Jesus — that we should love one another as God loves us. (3:11) Civility is an important quality for us to develop. In what happened in Indiana lately with the Religious Freedom and Restoration Act, I was not surprised at the behavior of many people in society. I was surprised that Christians would be uncivil to each other. Following the golden rule — treating others as we wish to be treated, would not be a bad guide. What could be more Christian than,  

In everything do to others as you would have them do to you” (Matthew 7:12).  

You want your political opinions respect, so it might be good to respect the opinion of others. If you want people to be kind to you, be kind to them. If you do not want to be cut off in traffic, do not be the person who cuts off other drivers. If you want others to let you out into traffic, let others out. If you want civil treatment at the grocery store, or in your kitchen, treat others with civility and respect. Even if you do not get civility in return, keep your cool, and let the civility flow.

            Secondly, people often express the qualities and tendencies of their parents.

When I am with the “Plasterer” family, they will say that I have the “Plasterer nose.” I do not know if that is a good or a bad. In any case, if you look closely at us, and indeed the rest of the family, you will see a family resemblance. Do you see a similarity between my son David and me? Some do, some do not. That is my grandson, Henry and granddaughter Nia, as well as Carrie. Probably too early to tell for the kids.

Being part of a family can have its benefits.  

When I was growing up, my surname was Rothschild. My grandfather used to say that we were the “Brooklyn branch” of the fabulously wealthy European bankers. If there is a family connection, we never found it, but people nonetheless made a lot of assumptions because of the name. I learned that it was useful for making restaurant reservations.[3] 

God carries your picture in his wallet.[4] 

            John is talking about our spiritual parentage when he refers to the difference between those who persist in their sin and those who earnestly seek to put it behind them.

John writes much about us being children of God. He makes it clear that we are not to be childish. I came across a list of The Toddler Property Laws that, I hope, communicates the point: 

            1. If I like it, it is mine.
            2. If it is in my hand, it is mine.
            3. If I can take it from you, it is mine.
            4. If I had it a little while ago, it is mine.
            5. If it is mine, it must never appear to be yours in any way.
            6. If I am doing or building something, all the pieces are mine.
            7. If it looks just like mine, it is mine.
            8. If I think it is mine, it is mine.
            9. If it is yours and I steal it, it is mine
            10. If I saw it first, or last, makes no difference, it is still mine. 

The Bible has many ways of talking about this. It refers to our sinfulness. It refers to our preference for darkness rather than light. In I John 3:10, John refers to being children of God or children of the devil. We need to take this matter of sin seriously. As children of God, we need to make a commitment to express the loving qualities and tendencies of God! That is what John is getting at with all this talk about sinning, and about the devil. These are tough verses, but if you have been listening, you will know I hear them.  

No one who abides in him [persists in] sins; no one who [continually and as a matter of planning] sins has either seen him or known him .… Everyone who commits sin [as a matter of one’s pattern of life] is a child of the devil; for the devil has been sinning [as a matter of commitment] from the beginning .… Those who have been born of God do not [commit themselves to a pattern of life committed to] sin, because God’s seed abides in them; they cannot [continue in a lifestyle committed to] sin, because they have been born of God. The children of God and the children of the devil are revealed in this way: all who do not do what is right are not from God, nor are those who do not love their brothers and sisters” (I John 3:6, 8, 9-10). 

Conclusion

            You know that we sin. You know that the church is sinful. Yet, John wants to ask us an important question. Who is your daddy? If we consistently behave in a typically non-loving, non-forgiving, non-merciful manner, we call into question our spiritual parentage. People who know God, who are God’s children, do not consistently live this way. 

            Little children, let us love, not in word or speech, but in truth and action. And by this we will know that we are from the truth and will reassure our hearts before him” (I John 3:18-19).

 

 

 

 

 



[1] Systematic Theology Volume 3, 531, 603.
[2] Church Dogmatics II.2 [37.3] 608.
[3] —Nina Utne, “What’s in a name?” Utne, November-December 2002, 12.Used by permission.
[4] —Sociology professor Tony Campolo, quoted by Jeanette Clift George, “Dad meets the messy baby,” Men of Integrity, January 18, 2000, ChristianityToday.com.