I Corinthians
15:51-58
51 Listen, I will tell you a
mystery! We will not all die, but we will all be changed, 52 in a
moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will
sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. 53
For this perishable body must put on imperishability, and this mortal body must
put on immortality. 54 When this perishable body puts on
imperishability, and this mortal body puts on immortality, then the saying that
is written will be fulfilled: "Death has been swallowed up in
victory." 55 "Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O
death, is your sting?" 56 The sting of death is sin, and the
power of sin is the law. 57 But thanks be to God, who gives us the
victory through our Lord Jesus Christ. 58 Therefore, my beloved, be
steadfast, immovable, always excelling in the work of the Lord, because you
know that in the Lord your labor is not in vain.
I Corinthians 15:51-58 has the theme of the
eschatological transformation that awaits the people of God. This passage
presents several challenges, in translation, theology and hermeneutics. The
central question is whether one needs to buy into an apocalyptic mindset to
understand fully this passage. Must one picture resurrected bodies leaping to
life when a trumpet sounds on judgment day? The difficulties of apocalyptic
images are that they need to be vivid enough to convey the reality of Christian
hope - yet they are figurative and imprecise, leaving space for improvisations
and situations that emerge over time. Paul seems compelled to reflect on these
end-time issues because of the Corinthians' confusion of Jesus' resurrection
and their own. In I Thessalonians 4:13-17, Paul has provided reassurance that
those who "fall asleep" before the second coming would not be at a
disadvantage: They would rise first. The Corinthian Christians have presented
him with a different set of problems.
51 Listen, a
word not often used by Paul, I will tell
you a mystery! Paul refers to a secret truth that God has revealed to and
through Paul about what is to happen at the second coming. We (Paul and his readers) will
not all (believers or all humanity) die,
but God will change us all, 52
in a moment (atomos), an indivisible
fragment of time, in the twinkling of an
eye, a split-second of transformation combined at the last trumpet.[1]
Paul speaks of the "last trumpet," a familiar image from the Hebrew
Scriptures. Isaiah 27:13 speaks of the trumpet blown for return of the exiles;
Leviticus 23:24 describes a blowing of a trumpet to usher in the civil New Year
as a penitential season that will conclude in the Day of Atonement. The last
trumpet does not equal the last in a series of trumpets. It is simply the
trumpet call that accompanies the End. The question that Paul is not attempting
to address, but one that has attracted the attention of modern readers further
complicates this. Paul is talking about believers: Living and dead that God
will change to conform to conditions of the resurrection age. Modern readers
have focused on "all." All believers? All humanity? Does this say
anything about the fate of the wicked? Again, we see the challenge of the
difficulty that these apocalyptic images have presented across the ages. Paul
does not give us the details of how all this will happen, just that it will
happen quickly. This provides Paul's audience with a standard feature of the
Day of the Lord in Jewish literature (cf. Zephaniah 1:16; Joel 2:1). Paul also
indicates that he expects that he will not be among those who are dead, for he
speaks of them in the third person. He believes he will be among the living,
whom he speaks of in the first person. This was a challenge in early Christian
eschatology. John deals with this issue differently than does Paul by holding
the present and the future in tension with each other, with more attention
given to the present. For Paul, the focus here is on the future, the Parousia.
Whether Paul changes his belief remains disputed by scholars, however; it seems
likely that if Paul's perspective changes, it is because Paul found his death
nearer, rather than that he saw the second coming further off. Another
significance of this passage is that it clearly envisions a finite life without
death. This life in fellowship with God does not involve total absorption of
our creaturely existence in God. Rather, it expects its renewal and definitive
establishment. Participation in divine life will not set aside the finite
quality of creaturely life. The significance of this point is that death and
finite life do not have a necessary connection.[2]
For the trumpet will sound, and God will raise the dead as imperishable, and God
will change us. What is important in
this passage is not the last trumpet or the rising of the sleeping dead, but
the confidence of Christians in the power of God who raised Jesus. It is
crucial that readers neither severely isolate these images in an unyielding
timetable, nor simply dismiss them as primitive fantasy. The work of the Spirit
is fundamental for the eschatological salvation event of the resurrection of
the dead. Resurrection means change into a new life resulting in a relation
between the work of the Spirit and theme of judgment. This mortal cannot
acquire immortality without a change. The whole notion of this “change” has a
link to judgment as well.[3]
53 For this perishable body
must put on imperishability, and this mortal body must put on immortality. Now,
in contrast to his emphasis in dealing with the problem presented to him by the
congregation in Thessalonica, Paul is saying that the dead in Christ will rise
with spiritual bodies and those who are still alive will have their mortal
bodies changed. The finite quality of the perfected life toward which God is
bringing us, when this corruptible will have put on incorruption, will no
longer have the form of a sequence of separated moments of time. Rather, it
will represent the totality of our earthly existence. The totality toward which
we now move will become reality, in a moment, in a change. [4]
Nothing will be put in place of this present life. No matter how pitiable, this
finite existence will share in eternal salvation. Rebirth to a very different
existence can accomplish this. Such a rebirth would not redeem this earthly
existence. It would have been left behind.[5]
54 When this perishable body
puts on imperishability and this mortal body puts on immortality. Plato
taught that the soul was immortal. It never died. Such is not the case in this
passage. Mortal must “put on” immortality. The mortal must pass through genuine
death before “immortality” becomes a gift of grace. Then the saying that we find written in Isaiah 25:7 finds its
fulfillment, "Death has been
swallowed up in victory." If the interpretation offered is correct, Gordon
D. Kaufman[6]
is quite unfair to the traditional interpretation of Christian hope. It has
never suggested that the resurrection of the body of Jesus means for us
everlasting continuation of this finite life. He rightly uses the comment of
Paul Tillich[7] to the effect that such “an infinity of the
finite could be a symbol for hell.” What Kaufman wants to do is place Christian
hope in creativity and freedom in such a way that it swallows up death in
victory, that there is victory over despair. The difficulty with this belief is
that one could come to such an optimistic notion without reliance upon the
specificity of faith in Jesus Christ. Of course, this is precisely what Kaufman
wants to do. He wants to separate Christian hope from Christ, placing in a “theocentric”
notion of the love and mercy of God. As he puts it, “it is no longer necessary
for Christians to concern themselves with old myths purporting to have special
gnosis in regard to life beyond the grave.” In Paul's emphasis on God changing
mortal bodies, Paul concludes that if flesh and blood were appropriate for this
world, it would be inappropriate for the world to come. Once God clothes the
believers in immortality, death can no longer touch them. Further, in Hosea
13:14 we read, 55 "Where,
O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting?" The point of these passages from the Hebrew
Scriptures is that they invite Death and Sheol to bring forth their terrors and
apply them. Here we have Paul mocking these powers as already defeated. God has
swallowed up death. He states this in the past aorist tense, which translates
into the present perfect in English. Paul's emphasis is on what happened rather
than the time of its happening. Paul uses these words as a taunt. He is putting
himself at the end of time and he mocks a powerless death, as one might a
fallen dictator. 56 The sting
of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. Death remains an enemy
for Paul, as it does for us. The hard fact is that death is not
"natural"; it is not a process eased by therapy. As humans, we live
for life and the sting of having to die is sin. Death is our enemy. 57 Nevertheless, thanks be to God, who gives us the victory
through our Lord Jesus Christ. In Paul, gratitude for the saving action of
God in Jesus Christ forms the starting point and context of all Christian
prayer.[8]
Death is now a disabled enemy. When Christians die, they are no longer
prisoners of death, but sleeping in the certainness of waking in the
resurrection. The reign of death rests on the power of sin, but since sin has
been overcome in Jesus' death and resurrection, it loses its power to terrorize
(cf. Romans 5:12, 21). Paul does not allow his eschatology to carry him away
into unreality. He recognizes that Death
is the last enemy God will overthrow. Death still prevails between us and still
has a sting. Paul does not come to the end of chapter-long discussion of
resurrection with the type of optimism that some personalities simply possess.
His optimism arises from an event that has given him knowledge of a victory
already won. The victory of Jesus the
Christ was a victory over sin, because he died to sin, a death to which this
life summons all human beings to share (cf. Romans 6:10f). The sting of death
is now, but in Christ, it will become a victory. Christian faith does not deny
death, but rather celebrates a Living God, a God that is greater than death.
58 Therefore, my beloved, be steadfast, immovable, always excelling in the
work of the Lord, because you know that in the Lord your labor is not in vain. Paul tempers his euphoria somewhat
by the reminder that the return of Christ is still in the future. In the end,
however, Paul does not emphasize "good behavior" as we await Christ's
return. He emphasizes ministry. No timetable, no lame excuses, no attempt to
second-guess God. Instead, Paul leaves us with instructions to serve the Lord
by spreading the good news of Christ's resurrection and ours and a reminder
that such labor will never be in vain.
Part of
what Paul may be saying here is that the crucifixion of Jesus is the end of our
time, while the resurrection of Jesus ushers in the last day. The believer in
Jesus lives a life hidden with Christ in God. Beyond this end, Paul can see
only one other prospect. God will be all in all (verse 28). The end is a
historical and temporal event. Yet, it is a present without a future. We have
no more information or promise, other than the sounding of the last trumpet in
verse 52. This moment is when corruption becomes incorruption, dishonor becomes
honor, and weakness becomes power. Time will be no more, as Revelation 10:6 put
it. There is no question of the continuation into the indefinite future of a
somewhat altered life. The New Testament hope for the other side of death looks
forward to the Eternal. God will divest this corruptible and mortal life of its
character as “flesh and blood.” It will then be eternal life in God and in
fellowship with Christ. Our time will undergo a transition and transformation
by participating in the eternal life of God. This transition and transformation
is the unveiling and glorifying of the life that in its time humanity has
already in Christ. Whatever happens in a twinkling of an eye is an unveiling of
the eschatological life already present throughout our lives. It is the
resurrection of the dead, which according to the indication given after the
resurrection of Jesus is our participation in His future revelation. This is
our hope in the time that we still have.[9]
An
indication of the validity of this approach is the struggle we find in the New
Testament regarding these matters. In the first-century church, Christians
believed that Jesus was coming back in their lifetime. Paul certainly believed
it. The Church described in the book of Acts believed it to the point that they
sold their houses and everything in their houses without regret because they
believed to their toenails that Jesus was coming back almost immediately to
retrieve them. Who needed jewelry, silverware, and real estate if they were
leaving to join Jesus in heaven in a matter of days or months or even years?
This was Paul's message to the first Christians in Corinth, Greece, in the
first century. "We will not all die," he wrote, "But we will all
be changed in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet."
Eventually, of course, all those who first received Paul's letter did die.
Jesus did not return in their lifetime. In addition, while most of us are not
assuming that Jesus will return today or tomorrow, there are many Christians,
usually pre-millennialists, who urge us to consider the possibility as a
reality. What would happen if Jesus comes again in our lifetime? Are we ready?
Some Christians still hang on to the first-century notion that, if Jesus could
return at any moment, we may as well sell our possessions to those faithless
folks who will need them after we are enraptured up to heaven with the Lord.
This is
not the whole story! Jesus is coming again. But we do not have a clue about
when or how that will happen, and in spite of all the cool predictions we might
glean from biblical prophecy, Scripture repeatedly warns us that no one knows
exactly when Jesus will return - not even the Son of Man himself (see Mark
13:32). Granted, the descriptions of the transfiguration of Jesus spark our imaginations,
but ours is a God of boundless creativity, and God good dazzle us with the
sight of our glorious Savior in countless ways.
In the meantime, God left us behind 2000 years
ago, not to scare each other about The End Times, not to judge each other, but
to serve in the likeness of Christ. Jesus left us with several warnings about
watchfulness, about readiness in the course of human life. He left us with many
instructions, and they did not include scaring our neighbors with hellfire and
brimstone. They include not only listening to God's living Word through Jesus
Christ, but living that Word ourselves and sharing the Good News with others.
[1] There are several textual problems and variants in
verse 51. This is largely due to the number and position of the negatives in
the sentence.
[2]
Pannenberg (Systematic Theology, Volume 2, p. 271)
[3]
(ibid., Volume 3, p. 623)
[4]
(ibid., Volume 3, p. 561)
[5]
(ibid., Volume 3, p. 574)
[6] (Systematic
Theology: A Historicist Perspective, p. 465-474)
[7]
(“Frontiers,” Journal of Bile and Religion, 1965, 33:22)
[8]
Pannenberg (Systematic Theology, Volume 3, p. 207)
[9]
Barth (Church Dogmatics, III.2, p. 624 [47.5])
I am really coming to like your concept of spiritual new bodies. However, you state that the second coming is not to be used by us to scare people and refer the Christ's parables in that context but don't they also at least suggest a warning both to Christians and non Christians? Lynn Eastman
ReplyDelete