Thursday, March 2, 2017

II Corinthians 5:20b-6:10


II Corinthians 5:20b-6:2 (3-10)

20b we entreat you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God. 21 For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.

As we work together with him, we urge you also not to accept the grace of God in vain. 2 For he says,

“At an acceptable time I have listened to you,

and on a day of salvation I have helped you.”

See, now is the acceptable time; see, now is the day of salvation! 3 We are putting no obstacle in anyone’s way, so that no fault may be found with our ministry, 4 but as servants of God we have commended ourselves in every way: through great endurance, in afflictions, hardships, calamities, 5 beatings, imprisonments, riots, labors, sleepless nights, hunger; 6 by purity, knowledge, patience, kindness, holiness of spirit, genuine love, 7 truthful speech, and the power of God; with the weapons of righteousness for the right hand and for the left; 8 in honor and dishonor, in ill repute and good repute. We are treated as impostors, and yet are true; 9 as unknown, and yet are well known; as dying, and see—we are alive; as punished, and yet not killed; 10 as sorrowful, yet always rejoicing; as poor, yet making many rich; as having nothing, and yet possessing everything.

 

Message                            "The Yes of God"                                          Pastor George


Year ABC
Ash Wednesday
March 1, 2017
Cross~Wind Ministries
Title: The Yes of God

Over everything we do and enjoy hover sighs of suffering and self-satisfied laughter of selfish indifference and oppression

Going deeper


Introducing the passage


Many scholars think of II Corinthians 2:14-7:4 as a rhetorical unit, Paul’s defense of his ministry, of which 5:11-6:10 is a key part as he explains his ministry of reconciliation. In verses 5:20-6:2 Paul offers an appeal for reconciliation with God. Paul writes of a relationship God has initiated and to which human beings must respond by accepting the offer. Here is the Yes of God to humanity. Reflect with me for a moment on the crucifixion of Jesus. Human beings sat in judgment of the innocent one, Jesus. He bore their judgment silently. In doing this, he accepted the burden of their sinful judgment. It reminds us of the suffering servant in Isaiah, where the suffering servant had a grave with the wicked. Hebrews 4:15 tells us that he experienced the tests of a human life without succumbing to sin. I Peter 1:9 says he was a lamb without blemish. In 3:18, Peter says the righteous died for the unrighteous in order to bring humanity to God. In Christ, God remains faithful to the covenant, not just with Israel, but the covenant with humanity. As Christ bore our sin, God takes part in our history. Perhaps Theodoret of Cyrus, a fifth-century bishop, best captured the spirit of this paradox when he wrote, “Christ was called what we are in order to call us to be what he is.” We know this because of the fundamental significance of the death of Christ for the way Paul thought of the reconciling of the world by God. God takes the sinful situation of our world into the heart of God. Our sin is no longer an obstacle with God. The door is open to friendship with God. God needed to deal with sin because it was in the way of what God wants for humanity and for creation, which is, fellowship in eternity. The cross opens the way for pardon today, so that we no longer needed to bear the weight of our sin. In fact, our sin is no longer our own. Christ has taken our sin. In the cross, God has said Yes to us. Yet, the event of the cross needs to become our event today. In our response of faith, we take that moment of the past and make it our moment of reconciliation with God. We have friendship with God.

II Corinthians 5:11-6:13 has the theme of the ministry of reconciliation. Paul was in Corinth from winter of 50 AD to summer of 51 AD, so Acts 18:1-17. He wrote this part of II Corinthians in the fall of 55 AD.  Timothy is with Paul.  Titus and two others bring the letter.  Titus has just arrived with good news. Many scholars construe 2:14-7:4 as a rhetorical unit, Paul’s defense of his ministry, of which 5:11-6:10 is a key part as he explains his ministry of reconciliation.

[In verses 5:20-6:2 Paul offers an appeal for reconciliation with God. Verses 20-21 reveal the resulting ministry that this reconciliation demands.] 20b we [providing the agency by which others know Christ, with the priority given to the action of God to which faith is the response.] entreat you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God.  [Paul writes of a relationship God has initiated and to which human beings must respond by accepting the offer.] 21 [In what some scholars think of a Jewish-Christian formula] For our sake he made him to be (to bear the burden of) sin who knew no sin, (Isaiah 53:9, which says that his oppressors made his grave with the wicked, may be the basis of this thought. Hebrews 4:15 says he experienced the tests of life, just as we do, but did so without succumbing to sin. In Hebrews 5:7-9, the Son learned obedience through what he suffered, becoming the source of eternal salvation. I Peter 1:19 refers to the lamb without blemish. I Peter 3:18 refers to Christ suffering once, but for humanity, a case of the righteous dying on behalf of the unrighteous, in order to bring people to God.) so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. [Barth will stress that we have in verses 18-21 the notion that atonement is the work of God. Reconciling here means the conversion of the world to God that took place in the form of an exchange or substitution that God has proposed between the world and God present and active in the person of Jesus Christ. It means that in being present and active in the world in Christ, God takes part in its history. God does not affirm or participate in its culpable nature, of course. However, God does take up the situation of the world into the divine nature. In order for God to make humanity the righteousness of God, humanity becomes covenant-partners with God.  The conversion of the world to God has taken place in this exchange. In Christ, the weakness and godlessness of the world become a lie. God removes them as an obstacle. In Christ, we see the peace of the world with God, the turning of humanity toward God, and the friendship of humanity with God. This becomes the truth of the new human situation.[1] Barth has a colorful way of putting this in saying that the great and inconceivable thing is that Christ acts as judge in our place by accepting responsibility for that we do in this place. It ceases to be our sin.[2] As Pannenberg sees it, the participation in the obedient suffering and death of Christ in 5:17 is the means whereby believers have reconciliation to God through Christ in verse 18. This train of thought helps us to understand the concluding statement in verse 21. Taken alone, this verse suggests a simple exchange of places. In the context of the preceding argument, however, the thought is integrated into that of the inclusive significance and effect of the death of Jesus Christ.[3] Pannenberg thinks such a statement makes little sense apart from a reference to the situation of the condemnation and execution of Jesus, in which political authorities made Jesus the sinner and he actually came under the curse of the law. For God, by means of the human judges, not only made Jesus to be sin but also had him bear in our place, and not merely in that of his Jewish judges or the Jewish people, the penalty that is the proper penalty of sin. The reason for this is that the proper penalty of sin follows from its inner nature, death as the consequence of separation from God.[4] God has gone to great lengths to reconcile humanity with God. Clearly, an exchange has taken place. God made Christ sin in exchange for God making humanity righteous. To paraphrase, God put the sinless Christ in the place of sinners, so that Christ had to bear the judgment of sin instead of them, expressing the theological thought of representation.[5] He suffered for all and triumphed for all.[6] Perhaps Theodoret of Cyrus, a fifth-century bishop, best captured the spirit of this paradox when he wrote, “Christ was called what we are in order to call us to be what he is.” The Protestant theology of the Enlightenment did not take into sufficient account the fundamental significance of the death of Christ for the Pauline thought of the reconciling of the world by God.[7] Pannenberg takes Paul to mean that the covenant righteousness of God is at issue. Here, Paul finds in those who are reconciled to God through the death of Christ a proof of the righteousness of God. The issue is no longer merely the relation of God to Israel, or the divine covenant righteousness to the chosen people. Paul extends to the Gentiles the thought of the covenant righteousness that the saving action of God demonstrates. Involved in divine righteousness is the relation of God to the whole creation. He thinks that the vocabulary of covenant righteousness in Paul moves forward materially along the lines of the approach of Jesus in terms of the goodness of God as Creator that in the coming of the reign of God shows itself to be a pardoning turning toward humanity.[8] Pannenberg says that in this situation of condemnation and execution, Jesus, whom through the resurrection God showed to be innocent, bore death as the consequence of our sin, thereby effecting representation in the concrete form of a change of place between the innocent and the guilty. The innocent suffered the penalty of death, which, as the harmful result of sin, is the fate of those in whose place Christ died. The vicarious penal suffering that is vicarious suffering of the wrath of God at sin rests on the fellowship that the Son accepted with all of us as sinners and with our fate as such. This link is the basis on which the death of Jesus can count as expiation for us. Without this vicarious penal suffering, the expiatory function of the death of Jesus is unintelligible, unless we try to understand his death as an equivalent offered to God along the lines of the satisfaction theory of Anselm, which has no basis in the biblical data.[9]]

[In verses 1-2, the apostles are serving God by extending the appeal God is making in Christ.] 1 As we work together with (cooperate) (SunergounteV) him, [with God in being ambassadors for Christ,[10]] we urge you also not to accept the grace of God in vain.  (The point refers to his efforts in speaking and their efforts in listening would be in vain) [Their failure to stand with Paul is a failure to experience reconciliation with God.]2 For he says, [Isaiah 49:8-9]

"At an acceptable time I have listened to you,

and on a day of salvation I have helped you."

See, now is the acceptable time; see, now is the day of salvation!  [The text applies to this moment in history, as if the servant songs in Isaiah find their fulfillment at this moment.]

[In verses 3-10, Paul supports the appeal. Paul offers his credentials. Those disputing with Paul subvert the gospel.] 3 We are putting no obstacle in anyone's way, so that no fault may be found with our ministry, 4 but as servants of God [Isaiah said the servant of the Lord would encounter trouble, so Paul now reiterates his hardship. He offers this list as a way of defending his ministry and offering an example to others. The passive tense here says he does not seek suffering. Rather, suffering comes upon him. Reading this list in the light of church history and of the suffering church throughout the world today, many faithful servants have had these experiences.] we have commended ourselves in every way: through great endurance, [first in the general suffering] in afflictions, hardships, calamities,  5 [second suffering endured at the hands of people] beatings, imprisonments, riots, [third the suffering of self-discipline] labors, sleepless nights, hunger;  6 [They commend themselves with good characteristics and tools they seek to cultivate and display in the course of their ministry] by purity, knowledge, patience, kindness, holiness of spirit, genuine love,  7 truthful speech, and the power of God; with the weapons of righteousness for the right hand and for the left;  8 in honor and dishonor, in ill repute and good repute. [They commend themselves in the paradoxical nature of suffering for God, the judgment of people overturned by God.] We are treated as impostors, and yet are true;  9 as unknown, and yet are well known; as dying, (or others spread rumors of his death) and see—we are alive; as punished, and yet not killed;  10 as sorrowful, yet always rejoicing; as poor, yet making many rich; as having nothing, and yet possessing everything.

 

Meditation


Buying stuff on credit, enjoying it now and paying for it later, seems to be the American way. The average American carries four different credit cards in his or her wallet on which we owe a median of $2,200. In fact, the average American consumer has 13 current credit obligations listed on his or her official credit report, owing money on everything from cars to furniture to whatever. Even if you do not have a credit card (and roughly 25 percent of Americans do not), it is still possible to have instant gratification with delayed remuneration. A new concept called “Bill Me Later” has been popping up on e-commerce sites. It allows consumers to purchase items and then receive an old-fashioned bill in the mail a few weeks later.

The problem with a “bill-me-later” mentality is that it puts the consumer in a serious bind. As credit bills mount, consumers find themselves locked deeper and deeper in the crushing grip of debt.[11]

Fortunately, many people are waking up to the fact that debt is something we need to avoid.[12] Release from debt opens up new opportunities and a new way of life.

Release from financial debt is something we all desire, but release from spiritual debt is even more liberating. We incur spiritual debt by sin, by self-indulgent living, by conforming to the hyper-consumptive lifestyle of the world. It is the kind of debt that is even more insidious than a credit card bill because we do not often realize we are racking it up until we come to a crisis point — a serious illness, a significant loss, a change in life circumstances.[13]

Paul seems to address this dilemma in our passage. The truth is that we are all in debt to God because of our sinfulness. It is a debt so deep that we cannot possibly pay it off through our good deeds or righteous living. Realizing this is not the time to give up. When you do not believe you are worth anything, that you have nothing and are nothing, why bother to change?

Sin puts us in a tough spot but Paul, acting like an enthusiastic first-century debt counselor, offers some good news to spiritual debtors. Imagine, if you will, that someone paid off all your financial debts in full — that your credit report went from 500 to 850 in an instant. That is essentially what Paul says has happened to our spiritual debts. With the coming of Christ and through his death on the cross on our behalf, there is a “new creation” (II Corinthians 5:17). The old life of sin and death has “passed away” and the debt paid off through Christ. In Jesus, God was reconciling us to himself, erasing the ledger of sin against us and instead offering us a clean slate.

The debt-relieving work that God had done in Christ, though, was work that people needed to experience. That is where Paul and his companions come in. God sent them, not to be judgmental bill collectors, but to be “ambassadors” who spread the good news (v. 18-20a). God had entrusted Paul and his friends with the “ministry of reconciliation” (v. 18). Something new had happened in Christ, thus something new must happen in response.[14]

God’s reconciling act in Christ requires a response. God offers us a gift, a release from our spiritual debts, a new life. God made Jesus “to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God” (v. 21). We must accept a gift, however. God has reconciled us to himself, now we must “be reconciled to God” (v. 20b). Accepting that gift is not just an exercise in belief or an excuse to start running up more debt. That would mean the gift was “in vain” (6:1). Rather, Paul urges the Corinthians and us to pay off our end of the deal now, not waiting until sometime later. “Now is the acceptable time; see, now is the day of salvation!” (6:2). The sooner we accept the gift of grace that God is offering, the sooner we can begin to live the life of the “new creation.”

Paul and his companions had carried this message of debt-free living to the world at great cost to themselves (6:4-9), yet the change that their message wrought on a debt-laden world was dramatic.[15]

We need to choose.

This much is certain: The greatest thing each person can do is to give himself to God utterly and unconditionally -- weakness, fears and all. For God loves obedience more than good intentions or second-best offerings, which are all too often made under the guise of weakness.[16]

The operatic tenor Luciano Pavarotti tells a story about how his father helped him discover the direction of his life's work. As a young man studying to become a teacher, Pavarotti received an invitation to study with Arrigo Pola, a famous tenor in his hometown of Modena, Italy. When it came time for him to graduate from college, he approached his father for advice: "Shall I be a teacher or a singer?"  His father replied: "Luciano, if you try to sit on two chairs, you will fall between them. For life, you must choose one chair." Pavarotti chose the singing chair. Although it would be another seven years before he would reach New York's Metropolitan Opera, Pavarotti credited this decision to choose one path, and one path only, as the key to his success.

Perhaps Ash Wednesday is an appropriate time to listen to the voice of the Spirit, and to choose one chair.

On Ash Wednesday we recognize that when it comes to the world’s standards we, too, really have nothing. The ashes on our foreheads remind us that “we are dust, and to dust we shall return.” All of the stuff that we have collected in our lives will eventually go to someone else. We come into the world with nothing and we leave with nothing. The ashes also remind us of the debt of sin that we owe and that at death the bill comes due. While that can be a depressing load (perhaps why Ash Wednesday does not generally translate into a packed house), facing the reality of sin and mortality can bring us to a decision point, a creative crisis. The more we recognize the depth of our spiritual indebtedness, the more we begin to realize the incredible gift God has given us in Christ, who releases us from it through his sacrifice on our behalf. Our debt has been stamped “Paid in Full” in his own blood. When we sign off on that with our own signature of acceptance, we can begin to see the “new creation” breaking in all around us.

You have slips of paper at the table. Some of us may prayerfully need to deal with a sin for which we need to repent and receive forgiveness. The beauty of it is that if you wrote that on this slip of paper, you already know the answer from God. If sin is a debt, you can write “Paid in Full” by the death of Christ.

I like the suggestion that Julie Upton gave at Triple S. This world needs more of the love of God in this world. What would happen if this Lent, we committed ourselves to offer gifts of love? She was rather ambitious, I thought, when she suggested that each day of Lent we offer a gift of love. You might want to use that slip of paper to write down at least one gift of love you want to give. That may get you started down the path.

In either case, I invite you to take the slip of paper and put it in a safe place as a reminder of the commitment you make tonight. I will give you a moment of silence.

 
In many churches, the Ash Wednesday tradition is for people to write down something for which they need to repent or be forgiven. This year, as they bring those slips of paper forward to the cross, you may want to meet them there with a red ink “Paid in Full” stamp. We love it when we finally pay off a financial debt, like a last car payment, and there’s a finality to seeing that stamp on the loan document. That kind of finality can be helpful for our sins, too. Christ has paid them in full. What an opportunity to celebrate!


[1] Church Dogmatics IV.1 [57.3] 73-78.
[2] Church Dogmatics IV.1 [59.2] 236.
[3] Systematic Theology Volume 2, 420.
[4] Pannenberg, Systematic Theology Volume 2, 425-6.
[5] Pannenberg, Systematic Theology Volume 2, 420.
[6] Pannenberg, Systematic Theology Volume 2, 427.
[7] Systematic Theology Volume 2, 407.
[8] Systematic Theology Volume I, 434-5.
[9] Pannenberg, Systematic Theology Volume 2, 427.
[10] Barth, Church Dogmatics IV.3 [71.4] 600.
[11] The actual cost of that $8 movie you went to and charged with plastic six months ago, for example, can now cost exponentially more than that amount as interest rates ratchet up the financial pressure. Faced with mounting debts and no ability to pay them, many folks get into the position where they file for bankruptcy. It is no wonder that Ambrose Bierce once defined debt as “an ingenious substitute for the chain and whip of the slave driver.” As long as you are in debt, somebody else owns your assets. Rack up enough debt and you can reach a point where it hardly seems worth it to try and dig yourself out.
[12] Consumers who have taken the radical step of performing “plastic surgery” by cutting up their credit cards and living below their means are finding a new sense of freedom. Sometimes it takes a time of crisis to force us to act responsibly and view our needs and wants differently than before.
[13] When we choose to live outside of regular obedience to God, seeing everything we are and everything we have as belonging to God, we can suddenly and tragically realize that we have sold ourselves into slavery to sin. Given that reality, “bill me later” is not good financial strategy, nor is it good spiritual practice. You never know when God is going to collect!
[14] In much of the ancient world, fear of angering the gods drove many people. Here came Paul with quite a different message: that the one true Creator God is renewing his good creation and wants to be in relationship with humans. The Incarnation of Christ bridged the separation between God and humanity. God had come among us to do for us what we could not do for ourselves, seeking reconciliation before judgment.
[15] Paul’s missionary team may have been “poor” themselves in terms of coinage, but their message was designed to make many “rich” in God’s grace, proving that it was possible to have “nothing” according to the world’s standards, yet “possessing everything” in a relationship with a generous and self-sacrificing God (6:10).
[16] --Søren Kierkegaard, Spiritual Writings: A New Translation and Selection (Harper Collins, 2010).

No comments:

Post a Comment