Showing posts with label Year A September 4-10. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Year A September 4-10. Show all posts

Saturday, September 5, 2020

Matthew 18:15-20

 


Matthew 18:15-20 (NRSV)

15 “If another member of the church sins against you, go and point out the fault when the two of you are alone. If the member listens to you, you have regained that one. 16 But if you are not listened to, take one or two others along with you, so that every word may be confirmed by the evidence of two or three witnesses. 17 If the member refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if the offender refuses to listen even to the church, let such a one be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. 18 Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven. 19 Again, truly I tell you, if two of you agree on earth about anything you ask, it will be done for you by my Father in heaven. 20 For where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there among them.”

 

Matthew 18:15-20 contains sayings on erring brothers and sisters. These regulations reflect a time when the church had to develop procedures for dealing with deviant behavior by its members. The Roman Catholic Church and Martin Luther find support for the sacrament of penance. Usually, a sacrament has a physical sign attached to it (water, bread, and wine) but we do not find such a sign here.[1] Instead, I would like us to move down a different path of reflection. The passage deals with a difficult topic. It suggests caring enough about the relationship to do something to make things right when they go wrong. The passage should raise a simple question for us. Do we have some action that we need to take to bring healing in any of our relationships? 

Aristotle spends about a third of his Nicomachean ethics discussing the virtue of friendship. In fact, it is no exaggeration to say that Aristotle bases his entire ethic upon friendship. A good person was inconceivable apart from good friends. Only a friend knows when to press and when to hold back. Only a friend has the right to hurt you. Moreover, truth -telling is inherently painful. We do not easily see the truth, especially when the truth exposes something painful about us. Such a notion is a large distance from a common way we practice friendship. We have given a friendship a bad name. We are open, tolerant, accepting, and gracious, all of which, in the proper context, are good qualities to have. Yet, it can suggest that if you stay out of my life, I will stay out of your life. Is that friendship? The fact that we are friends has become a way for us to excuse immoral behavior. We have developed the term “community” to refer to thin stuff. We have motorcycle, gay, and business communities. Some refer to them as tribes. Yet, and I say this firmly and with love, no community worthy of the name, no genuine friendship, is present without truthfulness. The truthfulness of a friendship and a community carries with it risk and pain in our willingness to confront. Discernment is a gift that involves determining between right and wrong. It acknowledges injustice. It names the hurt. Yet, all of this can arise out of an act of deep love. We love the truth enough to tell it, risk it, and hear it. In this regard, this passage is close to Aristotle in its notion of community. This passage takes seriously the notion of sin interrupting friendship and calling forth accountability to each other. Forgiveness and reconciliation are not about pretending that things are other than they are. We do not pat ourselves on the back and ignore the wrong done. True reconciliation exposes the awfulness, the abuse, the hurt, and the truth. It could make matters worse, at least for a time. It involves risk. Yet, in the end, the process is worth it. Only an honest confrontation with reality can bring healing. Superficial reconciliation, in fact, may well make matters worse.[2]

With this background, and admitting the difficulty of the teaching here, I will discuss the passage in three segments. We can look at the first two segments as outlining the grievance procedure of the early church, a procedure many modern churches have adopted.

First, the theme of the erring disciples is in verse 15. It has its source in the material Matthew has in common with Luke. In Luke 17:3, we have a saying that seems closer to what Jesus might have said, “If another disciple sins, you must rebuke the offender, and if there is repentance, you must forgive.” I am disappointed in the NRSV translation of Matthew. Granted, the context suggests “church,” but the word does not occur in this verse. In any case, the teaching here is that 15 “If another member of the church ( ἀδελφός σου) sins (ἁμαρτήσῃ)against you, making sure you are not simply the one easily offended, go and point out the fault when the two of you are alone. If the member listens (ἀκούσῃthe brother or sister will hear) to you, you have regained that one (τὸν ἀδελφόν σου). In our culture, it is almost a mortal sin to offend someone. Do whatever you want, but do not offend someone. If you do, you will quickly be made to feel guilty and ashamed. Such easily taken offense is a great interrupter of the community. We need to remember that throughout the passage, the focus is upon restoring fellowship. This passage keeps the notion of “sin” quite general. Other passages in the New Testament see no problem with listing sins like sexual license, economic duplicity, or theological error. It leaves to our imagination what this sin might be that another person in the church has committed against us. I should also note that some very good Greek manuscripts omit that the sin is “against you.” As it stands, the point is that the community must take sin seriously, even when you are the recipient of that sin. We are not to ignore it. We have a responsibility for each other. If another has sinned, we can help that person retain honor in the community by bringing it to their attention. What matters is the reconciliation between two followers of Jesus. If any persons should have readiness to forgive, it should be followers of Jesus.[3]

The second segment is in verses 16-18, verses unique to Matthew. At this point, we can see that the strategy for dealing with sin is straightforward. After the one-to-one confrontation, the passage recommends another confrontation that takes place with witnesses. 16 But if you are not listened to, take one or two others along with you, so that every word may be confirmed by the evidence of two or three witnesses. The advice has its basis in Deuteronomy 19:15. which stresses that a single witness does not suffice to convict a person of a crime, but rather, one will need two or three witnesses. The passage elaborates a procedure in Jewish Law and applies it to the fellowship of those who are disciples of Jesus. The reason for witnesses is two-fold. It protects the one who has committed the perceived sin and the one sinned against. If you think someone has sinned against you, you might be wrong. Since you have tried to offer correction to the brother or sister and failed, the witnesses might have the right words. They function as referees and judges. 17 If the member refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church (ἐκκλησίᾳ)the witnesses protecting both partners in the confrontation. If this relatively private process does not work, the passage recommends the public process of bringing the matter to the church. I grant that this process also shows that the church takes sin seriously. We need to remember, however, that church for Matthew referred to 15-40 people! I cannot imagine any pastor of a church legalistically following this procedure in our setting. And if the offender refuses to listen even to the church (ἐκκλησίας), let such a one be to you as a Gentile (ἐθνικὸς, pagan, unclean) and a tax collector (τελώνης, unclean). If we are not careful, we could interpret this saying as contradicting the behavior of Jesus toward these groups. This counsel presents an interesting quandary. On one hand, it straightforwardly commands the church to separate itself from those who refuse to seek repentance. The observant Jew was not to associate with groups designated “unclean.” To do so would risk one's own purity and essential integrity. One could read this verse, then, as the Christian community shunning those who refuse to practice repentance of their sins when properly confronted by the community.  The quandary such an interpretation presents is that Jesus himself spent much of his ministry associating with those despised and rejected as unclean by Jewish law, specifically Gentiles and tax collectors. The community must not accept sin as natural, but rather, fight against it. The goal is winning over the sinner. Thus, far from separating oneself, considering such persons in the category of Gentile or tax collector would become part of the church's call to continue Jesus' mission of outreach to these and all outcasts. It could then be both a pronouncement of judgment by the church and a call to renewed missionary effort toward those it has justly ostracized. It is worthwhile to recall Paul's teaching along a similar vein. 

"My friends, if anyone is detected in a transgression, you who have received the Spirit should restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness ... Bear one another's burdens, and in this way fulfill the law of Christ" (Galatians 6:1-2). 

 

Although it is impossible to be certain, Paul may be referring to an oral tradition about which both he and Matthew knew. It is instructive to read this Scripture passage over against another one that provides advice for conflict resolution. The other passage is Matthew 5:23-24. 

"So when you are offering your gift at the altar, if you remember that your brother or sister has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother or sister, and then come and offer your gift."

 

Notice that the roles have reversed. In the present passage, the person who takes the initiative to go and visit the brother or sister is the person who has been at the receiving end of a sin by a brother or sister. In Chapter 5, you are not the victim this time, but the perpetrator. The remarkable thing about these two passages is that the advice is pretty much the same for both parties. Whether you are the one against whom someone has sinned or the one who has sinned, you still have responsibility to swallow your pride, get up, and go to your sister or brother, seeking reconciliation. As individuals and as a community, we are to take sin seriously. Finally, 18 Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven. The authority previously given to Peter to have the keys to the kingdom of heaven to bind and loose, this passage now gives to the community. It does so without reference to a leader who might have the keys. To the question "What is the power of the keys?” the Heidelberg Catechism supplies this answer: 

"The preaching of the holy gospel and Christian discipline toward repentance. Both of them open the kingdom of heaven to believers and close it to unbelievers"

 

The sacrament of penance has its scriptural basis here. Despite such an account of the handing over the power of the keys to the disciples, as here, we cannot speak of the instituting of a penitential rite by Jesus related to the pronouncing of the remission of sins as the sacrament of penance by the church. One may doubt whether the power of the keys originally had to do with the forgiving of sins rather than with normative decisions.[4]

Unlike our smart phones, which have an internal gyroscope that keeps what is on the screen in sync with us as users, we do not have internal gyroscopes that keep us in sync with each other. In the family of God, people get sideways with one another. Sometimes, it is over trivial things. There are snarky comments made at board meetings and disagreements about just how the youth should fund their upcoming ski trip. And sometimes, we get sideways with one another over truly sinful and downright evil things. 

- Lies get told. 

- Money goes missing. 

- Power gets protected. 

- Promises get broken. 

- Affairs take place. 

- Factions form. 

 

The picture is turned upside down and, no matter how vigorously we shake the relationship, it is not going to fix itself. We must take action. The action Jesus suggests involves caring enough about the relationship to do something to make things right. Do we have some action that we need to take?

            We may see a friend going down a self-destructive path. Do we say or do anything? Too often, our response is to ask, “Who am I to judge?” Such a response suggests enough self-awareness to acknowledge that all of us have sins and weaknesses that make relationships difficult. Yet, to be discerning enough to see the self-destructive behavior of a family member or friend is an act of love and friendship. Too often, in many of our relationships, we say things like, “Who am I to judge?” when what we really mean is “I’ll promise to stay out of your life, stand by quietly as you plummet into oblivion if you in turn promise to stay out of my life. We will call that ‘friendship.’ ” 

The danger of looking at ourselves as isolated individuals is that we will become profoundly alone. The one moral absolute, the one rigidly enforced conviction, is that one must avoid any judgment upon the behavior of others. We call this being “open,” “tolerant,” “accepting,” or even “gracious.” Translated, it means stay out of my life and I will in turn stay out of yours. Such emptying of relationships from moral or virtue considerations will bring death to intellectual discourse and wise discernment. It will bring death to healthy community. It would take a thin approach to reality to suggest that all cultures, all beliefs, and all lifestyles, are the same. Such a stance, while sounding tolerant, is the path to disrespect for differences and isolation of the worst kind. It becomes a code for “you stay out of my life, and I’ll stay out of yours.” We often use the word community, as in “business community,” to describe people who share common interests. Yet, such a notion of community is thin. There can be no community worthy of the name, no connection that is deep, no friendship without truthfulness. And there can be no truthfulness without judgment, without that risky, sometimes painful willingness to confront. Judgment, the assignment of right and wrong, the acknowledgment of genuine injustice, the naming of real hurt, the telling of truth, can be an act of deepest love. I love the truth enough to tell it. I love you enough to risk it. If Aristotle was right in suggesting that virtue arises out of friendship, then Jesus was far closer to Aristotle than to our modern but thin notions of friendship and community. 

The third segment, verses 19-20, with its theme of the presence of Jesus, is unique to Matthew. It seems to go back to the procedure before bringing the matter to the congregation. The context for the authority of the community is prayer19 Again, truly I tell you, if two of you agree on earth about anything you ask, it will be done for you by my Father in heaven. In this context, the Father will recognize the negotiated agreement as legitimate without involving the action of the entire congregation. 20 For where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there among them.” It took ten males to form a Jewish synagogue. If the two or three mentioned earlier prayerfully commit themselves to an agreement, the Lord is present. The language speaks of Jesus as already ascended to heaven. Even in this intimate gathering of a few persons, the church is present. Wherever personal witness commands a hearing, the church is already there, as the fellowship of believers, and the church precedes and encompasses every individual event of this type. By the Spirit, Jesus Christ is present to the community.[5] The point is the presence of Christ is a vital force in this process of reconciliation that makes the outcome sure in that it will advance the health of the body of Christ. Such presence is a reconciling one. The agreement will lead to the health of the congregation. Christ is not present among them as if a third or fourth member of the group. Christ is present in the center of the relationship. They mutually acknowledge that Christ has gathered them. The objective is to strengthen them for eternal life. They pray with each other.[6] It would be quite likely that rules of conduct embodying a life of faith and love of God, and directions showing faithfulness to the Lord and to the apostolic origin of the church, would be viewed as permanently valid norms for the lives of Christians. This process is at work in the handing down and developing of the sayings of Jesus in general, evident in this passage as an example.[7]



[1] Pannenberg, Systematic Theology, Volume 3, 339.

[2]  --Desmond Tutu, No Future Without Forgiveness (Random House, 2009), 218.

 

[3] Pannenberg, Systematic Theology, Volume 3, 246.

[4] Pannenberg, Systematic Theology Volume 3, 365-6.

[5] Systematic Theology Volume 3, 123, 323.

[6] Barth, Church Dogmatics IV.2 [67.2] 658, [67.4] 699-706.

[7] Systematic Theology Volume 3, 78.

Romans 13:8-14

 


Romans 13:8-14 (NRSV)

Owe no one anything, except to love one another; for the one who loves another has fulfilled the law. The commandments, “You shall not commit adultery; You shall not murder; You shall not steal; You shall not covet”; and any other commandment, are summed up in this word, “Love your neighbor as yourself.” 10 Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore, love is the fulfilling of the law.

11 Besides this, you know what time it is, how it is now the moment for you to wake from sleep. For salvation is nearer to us now than when we became believers; 12 the night is far gone, the day is near. Let us then lay aside the works of darkness and put on the armor of light; 13 let us live honorably as in the day, not in reveling and drunkenness, not in debauchery and licentiousness, not in quarreling and jealousy. 14 Instead, put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to gratify its desires.

 

Romans 13:8-14 has the theme of wake up and put on love. This is not about sentiment, but about readiness. Because God’s new day is dawning in Christ, we owe one another awake, active, Christ-shaped love.

In Romans 13:8-10, Paul calls for a life within the community rooted in love. We might think of Romans 1-11 as a discussion of how, in the light of the revelation one sees in Christ, we are to love God, thereby fulfilling the first four of the Ten Commandments. In Romans 12-15:13, Paul moves to a consideration of the second table of the Ten Commandments that deals with relationships with people. He focuses in these few verses on love as summing up what we owe each other. Love suggests that something matters and is important to you. Your life is not a “whatever” a life. Your life matters at the point where love sums up the desire of your heart and the way you seek to live. If love is the answer, what is the question? How would you answer that question? My suggestion is that love is the answer to the question of what we owe each other, the question of meaningful life, and the question of what leads to human flourishing. This concern of Paul connects well with popular culture. 

"All you need is love,

dah, dah, dah, dah, dah,

all you need is love,

dah, dah, dah, dah, dah,

all you need is love, love,

love is all you need."

 

Love is all we need. On this Paul, the apostle and Paul the McCartney agree. For another generation, "Love Makes the World Go Round."  It is a nice thought.  A romantic thought.

Verse by verse study

            Owe no one anything, except to love (ἀγαπᾶν)[1] one another. It may be strange to think of love as a debt we owe to each other. Yet, ethical life may well begin with the question of what we owe to other human beings. Paul might suggest that before we discuss matters of what we do toward each other, let us understand that rules begin with the priority of love and must end with asking whether our actions reflect love. Another aspect of making your life the offering of a living sacrifice (12:2) is to have this kind of love operative in your life. He has implied this view of love in 12:14, 17-21. Love is to guide our relationships with others. Such love includes all persons and is therefore universal. If Paul focused in 12:9-10 on love within the Christian community, he is expanding its application here. Love, if we have proper content to it, is the primary moral obligation we owe to each other. We can speak this way about love because of its relationship with love as a characteristic of God as we have seen that love shown to us in Christ and the power of the Spirit.[2] Loving each other finds a reflection in John 13:34, 14:12, and 17, where John is willing to think of love such love as a new commandment, based in the love Jesus had for them. Paul earlier in Romans exhorts his readers to love with mutual affection (12:10). Earlier in his life, he said the exhortation to love each other was such a common theme of life together that he did not need to write extensively about it (I Thessalonians 4:9). For the one who loves another has fulfilled (πεπλήρωκεν) the law. It fulfills the law in the sense that one will do what the law entails, even as he earlier argued that faith establishes the Torah. Although he likely is thinking of Torah, Paul is also thinking of the legal obligations of moral and ethical life in all cultures. The point is that Paul is not abrogating the law in any form it might take. We need legal codes in society. We need some sense of the actions we owe to each other that we often find in ethical discourse. He assumes the value of the law, even as he wants to move beyond it in saying that love fulfills it. Love does not cancel out the law. It fulfills the Law. He has a positive view of the Law. However, he refuses to make Law the primary guide in a human life. living by a code unites you to others who share the code and gives you moral superiority over those who do not share the code. It leads, at minimum, to arrogance and separation. It can also lead to the justification of violence against those who do not share the code. Abiding by a code is always a dangerous path. Allowing love to transform your mindset is a difficulty but rewarding path. Can we agree that if law were the heart of our relationships, our relationships would suffer? Love becomes the heart of interpersonal relationships. Love is the ethical outcome of the life made new by faith in Christ.[3]  Paul is suggesting that love is what we do graciously in the lives of others. We act toward others as God has already acted toward us in Jesus Christ, as he stated in 5:1-8. We can see this way of thinking in other parts of the New Testament: grace overflows with the faith and love we find in Christ Jesus ( I Timothy 1:14). As good stewards of the grace of God, maintain constant love for each other, be hospital to each other, and serve each other, for love covers a multitude of sins (I Peter 4:8-10). God first loved us, so we cannot claim to love God and hate each other, so the commandment we have from Jesus is not a burdensome one, but the simple and difficult one to love each other (I John 4:17-5:3). If Jesus is the pattern of this love, it saves us from getting sentimental about love. People are not always loveable! I believe Erma Bombeck said that children need love the most when they deserve it the least. The same is true if we broaden our consideration to all the persons we meet. The point is not that we are to feel warm and cozy about everyone. Paul highlights the difficulty of this path by suggesting that we can fulfill the moral obligation of The commandments in Exodus 20:13-17 and Deuteronomy 5:17-21, “You shall not commit adultery (Romans 2:22 as well); You shall not murder; You shall not steal (Romans 12:21 as well); and maybe even, You shall not covet” as Paul lists the Septuagint order of the Decalogue and any other commandment. He could have listed more such commandments in the Old Testament. Yet, his answer would be the same. [4] Paul has already referred to specific commandments from the Jewish law, stealing, adultery, and idolatry, that appear to him to be held in contempt by his Jewish-Christian hearers in Rome, with the result that the God of the law - the God of Jesus and Paul, also - is discredited in the eyes of non-believers (Romans 2:21-22). The laws or commands are summed  (ἀνακεφαλαιοῦται, a rare word) up in this word (λόγῳ)from Leviticus 19:18, “Love your neighbor as yourself.” Love will bring the entire law to its proper conclusion. In fact, love brings the law to a head (Dunn, 778). Love sums up the law. Paul discusses the obligation of charity or love that sums up the whole Mosaic Law.  This is the way the righteousness of God rules the conduct of Christian life. The notion of a positive view of the law that finds its fulfillment in love runs the risk of contradiction with Romans 10:4 concerning Christ being the end of the law. It would seem Paul is seeking to derive the content of his practical directions from the relation of believers to Christ. He reconsiders the divine law in light of the love of God for the world that the Father demonstrated in the sending of the Son. The fellowship we have with God calls us to the difficult path of love for human beings.[5] Christians must conduct themselves in Christ and in love.  Paul has spoken throughout the letter about love to God and God’s love to us.  Now, he takes up the theme of our love for each other. This concept is not unique to Paul. Rabbi Hillel summarized the law in the negative form of the golden rule: "That which you hate do not do to your fellows; this is the whole law; the rest is commentary; go and learn it." A third-century rabbi, Rabbi Simlai believed that Amos (5:4) and Habakkuk (2:4) had condensed the law to one aspect: "Seek me and live." Jews of Paul’s day would have found him quite appropriate here. He says that a particular “word” λόγῳ sums up the Law. This suggests that the “word” is a matter of divine revelation. The Hebrew Bible refers to the Ten Commandments as the Ten Words. That word is another portion of the Torah, Leviticus 19:18, to love the neighbor as oneself. Paul will refer to it in Galatians 5:14 as well. Jesus started this line of argument (Mark 12:28-31). We are to understand this use of neighbor in the universal sense we discussed earlier. I have long appreciated the guidance of C. S. Lewis in Mere Christianity on this point.

Do not waste your time bothering whether you 'love' your neighbor, act as if you did. As soon as we do this, we find one of the great secrets. When you are behaving as if you loved someone, you will presently come to love him. If you injure someone you dislike, you will find yourself disliking him more. If you do him a good turn, you will find yourself disliking him less.

 

10 Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore, love is the fulfilling of the law. We see echoes of Old Testament admonitions to take care of the widow, the poor and the orphan (Deuteronomy 10:18-20; 14:29; 24:17, 20-21; 26:12-13; Jeremiah 22:3). As a result, Paul's words in this verse are decidedly Jewish, reflecting prophetic and Levitical issues. Love fulfills the law because it does no wrong to the neighbor, universally understood. The neighbor might be the enemy, which he has covered in 12:14-21, or the governing authority, which he has covered in 13:1-7 (Dunn, 780-81). Love is the supreme gift in I Corinthians 13. Love is the freedom to be a servant to each other in Galatians 5:13-15. He complements the congregation for the love it has already shown and encourages this love with increasing depth and breadth to the point where he does not even to write them reminders to do so in I Thessalonians 4:9-12. Truly, our conversations about God (Romans 1-11) are always interrupted conversations when we consider the supremacy of love toward human beings. If we do not hear the voice of God in the other person, we may not hear the voice of God anywhere.[6] We must be clear. A love for God that omits such love for the neighbor is not love for God. Law demands action, but for Paul, the action the Law requires is love. In the giving of oneself that love suggests the believer fulfills the Torah. They do what God requires and what is right in the sight of God.[7]

Application

Frankly, life is harder this way, for such love, properly understood, takes us beyond the legal question we often have in mind with moralistic thinking. The love to which Paul invites us is harder because it is a humble path, in contrast to the arrogance and self-righteousness inherent in the way of the code. 

The way of love is harder because it is a peaceful and reconciling path, in contrast to the tendency toward binding oneself to a tribe of "us" against any other tribe of "them" generated by the code. Law has a finish line: you either stole or you did not, you either committed adultery or you did not. That checkable quality is precisely what makes law-keeping breed arrogance — once you know you have cleared the bar, you also know who has not. Love has no such bar. We will never fulfill the moral obligation of love! There is no point at which we can say we have now loved our neighbor sufficiently — which is exactly Paul's point elsewhere, that love "never ends" (1 Corinthians 13:8) and is meant to "overflow more and more" (Philippians 1:9), not arrive and stop. This reframes what it means that "the one who loves has fulfilled [πεπλήρωκεν] the law." The perfect tense does not announce a completed achievement so much as a standing condition of being caught up in the law's true intent — we fulfill the law the way a river fulfills its banks, continuously, by its ongoing character, not by reaching a terminus. Therefore, we are constantly growing in our understanding and practice of the breadth and depth of love — not because we have failed to arrive, but because love, rightly understood, has no arrival. This is the same already-but-not-yet shape Paul will use in the very next verses: salvation is already ours and still approaching; we are already awake and must keep waking. Love's unfulfillability is not a separate confession of limitation — it is the same eschatological grammar that holds the whole passage together.

 

Miroslav Volf gained some insights into this question recently on a trip to his native Croatia. He and a friend went on a quest for some sausage, and their journey took them to the home of an old man in a distant village. When they entered his kitchen, they saw an open Bible on the table, one that the man had clearly picked up and read. The old man offered them some wine, and they started talking. Not about sausage, but about Christian life. The old man said,

"Always choose a more difficult path. It's easier for us to be served than to serve and to take than to give. Serving is the harder path, giving is the harder path. Because we are selfish, the path of love is always more difficult."

 

Miroslav Volf was amazed that they were having that kind of conversation, rather than just exchanging a few pleasantries about the weather or sports. Yet, if the Bible were on your kitchen table, then those sorts of conversations would happen. The old man was willing to engage others in conversation about the great questions of human existence and challenges of a life worth living.

To conclude, yet another song:

And when you feel afraid (Love one another)

 When you've lost your way (Love one another)

 And when you're all alone (Love one another)

 And when you're far from home (Love one another)

 And when you're down and out (Love one another) 

 And when your hopes run out (Love one another)

 And when you need a friend (Love one another) 

And when you're near the end (Love)

(We've got to love)

(We've got to love one another) 

 

Light of the world, shine on me

Love is the answer

Shine on us all

Set us free

Love is the answer.[8]

 

Romans 13:11-14 has the theme of the special need of ethical consecration because of the approaching eschatological crisis. He has just referred to the command to love as the primary preparation for the “end.” 

            Our passage brings Christian hope and Christian life together. Our hope for the future means we are to live a certain way today. Paul consistently held together two horizons. He is quite aware of the human plight of sin and darkness. He is also quite aware of the hope for a new creation in Christ. He will point out that much of humanity is asleep both to the plight and to the hope. Even we in the church can slumber. We need to awaken. Every moment contains the possibility of being our time for God. We are in the night but waiting for the full light of day to come. If we are really waiting for the day, then we need to live in the light of the daylight we see coming in Christ. It will be a battle. The darkness is not yet gone. The light is not yet fully come. So we need to put on the armor. We need to have the mentality of a soldier when it comes to spiritual life. 

Verse by verse study

11 Besides this, you know what time (καιρόν) it is. They know the time is short, which is the basis for respect for the state and for love of neighbor. Do not waste time squabbling with either. In that sense, J. Louis Martyn has insightfully described Paul’s vision as “bifocal.”[9] Paul simultaneously has an eye on two horizons — that which is happening on earth because of the enslaving power of sin in the old age and the in-breaking of God’s kingdom into this earthly sphere. These verses reveal the apocalyptic vision of Paul, his understanding that this present age is passing away and his certainty that God is ushering in a new age. They know how it is now the moment for you to wake from sleep. Paul expresses this concern in other letters. In I Thessalonians 5:2, he reminds them that the Day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. In 5:4-8, they are not in darkness, but children of light. They are not to sleep, but rather, are to keep awake and be sober. They are to put on the armor of faith, hope, and love. In Colossians 4:2, Paul encourages his readers to be watchful in prayer with thanksgiving. Karl Barth has an extensive discussion of the importance of “awakening” in conversion. Where someone awakens and therefore wakes and rises, he has been asleep. Christians have been asleep, just like others. What distinguishes them is their sleeping is in the past. Yet, is there not still a Christianity that sleeps with the world and likes it? His answer is affirmative. The admonition here, in fact, assumes that Christians still need the admonition to waken. Christians are those who are awake in the sense they awaken a first time, and then again, to their shame and good fortune. They are, in fact, those who constantly stand in need of reawakening and who depend upon the fact that they are continually reawakened. The sleep from which they awaken is the relentless downward movement caused by their sloth.[10]  Barth also says that the notion of “awakening” in conversion is the result of the influence of pietism and Methodism. He thinks it legitimate in that it has proximity to the resurrection of Jesus, it suggests a specific word that awakens, and passages like this suggest the need for continual awakening. The Kairos is the eschatological era or last days, begun by Christ's death and resurrection and is co-extensive with the age of the church, the age of salvation.  Paul evokes the notion of time not with the basic reference to the Greek term chronos, but to kairos. Here he signals that this is a special sense of time, namely God's time and God's activity in history. The "time" is technically before the second coming.  Paul refers to the time that does not occur in time; a moment that is not moment in time.[11] Barth will say that between the past and the future, between the times, a “Moment” exists that is no moment in time, the eternal Moment. At that point, time reveals its secret. Time has not come and gone, but the person is one who has been and will be, who dies and lives, falls and stands. We are the ones who spend our years as a tale that we tell, which is the secret of time made known in the Moment of revelation, a Moment that always is, and yet is not. Every moment in time bears within it the unborn secret of revelation. Yet, distinctions within time are appropriate, for some are near and some are far. A tension exists between the “then” and the “now,” a tension that is not just chronological. We stand on the boundary of time. Thus, the “end” of which the New Testament speaks is no temporal event, no legendary “destruction” of the world, but a true end. He makes fun of the “short and perfectly harmless chapter entitled” Eschatology, without naming Schleiermacher.[12]

In the ancient world, "sleep" was a metaphor for spiritual inattentiveness. Jesus himself warned against spiritual snoozing lest he return and find his feckless followers asleep instead of awake and at work (Matthew 24:43; Mark 13:36). Paul argues that the dawn has already broken, daylight is burning, "the night is far gone, the day is near" and "salvation is nearer to us than when we became believers" (Romans 13:12). This "salvation" is both a present and future reality: present, because it can bring us into a saving relationship with God right now, and future, because Christ's return brings salvation and wholeness to the entire creation. The kairos is getting short, says Paul, and it is time to wake up. What will it take us to wake up and be alert to what God is calling us to be and to do? To continue with the analogy, when you wake up spiritually, make sure you put on the spiritual clothing, sometimes called armor, because you are in a fight.

Application

Everyone is familiar with the phenomenon of feeling more or less alive on different days. Everyone knows on any given day that there are energies slumbering in him which the incitements of that day do not call forth, but which he might display if these were greater. Most of us feel as if we lived habitually with a sort of cloud weighing on us, below our highest notch of clearness in discernment, sureness in reasoning or firmness in deciding. Compared with what we ought to be, we are only half awake. Our fires are damp, our drafts are checked. We are making use of only a small part of our possible mental and physical resources.[13]

One of the great liabilities of history is that all too many people fail to remain awake through great periods of social change. Every society has its protectors of the status quo and its fraternities of the indifferent who are notorious for sleeping through revolutions. But today our very survival depends on our ability to stay awake, to adjust to new ideas, to remain vigilant and to face the challenge of change. The large house in which we live demands that we transform this world-wide neighborhood into a world-wide brotherhood. Together we must learn to live as brothers or together we will perish as fools.[14]

 

Verse by verse study

For salvation is nearer to us now than when we became believers. This assertion of the imminence of the day of Jesus’ return is quite like what Paul wrote in I Thessalonians (4:15; 5:4-5) and I Corinthians (7:29). In other words, the salvation of the Roman Christians has not completely arrived. It is emerging. This eschatological expectation places the horizon of God's activity in Jesus Christ far beyond any individual's situation, compliance, or non-compliance with the law. Paul signals here that God is at work and that in Jesus Christ, God's saving purposes continue to emerge. While early Christians expected Christ’s coming imminently, the delay did not shatter the foundations of their faith. Rather, through the risen Lord and the Spirit, eschatological salvation had already become a certainty for believers, so that the length of the remaining span of time was a secondary matter.[15] Put another way, the turning-point of history occurred, even if the “end” has not. 12 The night is far gone, the day is near. Waiting for the return of Christ is like being in the night and waiting for daylight to come. Night would be the time of spiritual sleep. The life prior to being born in Christ into the Spirit was known as "sleep," "darkness," and "night." The life in Christ and in the Spirit is being "awake," "living in the light," and "in the day." Such a metaphor of night and day, sleep, and wakefulness captures the power of transformation that adult Christians experience in baptism and in being bound together in the Spirit of Christ. By evoking this contrast rhetorically, Paul both reminds the Roman Christians who they are (as opposed to who they were) and encourages them to be steadfast in the commitment to the life that God is calling them to in Christ. God has achieved this transformation within them. They have awakened, and it is now upon them to keep in the light. Barth stresses that this sense of the shortness of the time available arises because of Christ. The promised reign of God drew near and came right up to them, and with it the end of time. The new day is the event in which to which they in their time bore witness. They continue in their time, but only as they are in the time of the revelation, declaration, and realization of their time in its hastening toward the end that has already come. As Barth sees it, Christ rules time, time is short, and the duration of time is unknown to those who live in it. Essentially, the vanishing of the night and the breaking of the day have begun, and nothing can no longer stop it. The same Lord stands at the beginning and the end, he is also Lord of the time between.[16]

Let us then lay aside the works of darkness and put on the armor of light. The use of the light/darkness dichotomy to symbolize good and evil was widespread in ancient Judaism and Christianity. Within the Christian Scripture, for example, we see the dichotomy in wisdom literature and in John.

Proverbs 4:16-19

16 For they cannot sleep unless they have done wrong; they are robbed of sleep unless they have made someone stumble. 17 For they eat the bread of wickedness and drink the wine of violence. 18 But the path of the righteous is like the light of dawn, which shines brighter and brighter until full day. 19 The way of the wicked is like deep darkness; they do not know what they stumble over.

John 12:35-36

35 Jesus said to them, "The light is with you for a little longer. Walk while you have the light, so that the darkness may not overtake you. If you walk in the darkness, you do not know where you are going. 36 While you have the light, believe in the light, so that you may become children of light."

 

One could also find many other texts. It is particularly prominent in apocalyptic texts. For instance, the tension between good and evil in some of the most important texts found among the Dead Sea Scrolls is presented as a struggle between the “sons of light,” who are gathered under the banner of the “angel of light,” and the “sons of darkness,” who rally around the “angel of darkness (e.g., 1QS 3.13-4.26). Just as the night was associated with certain behaviors, so, too, was the approach of dawn. In Paul's experience as a working stiff in the hot eastern lands, the earliest hours of the newly dawned day were the busiest. With the exhausting heat of mid-day still far off, the cool of the morning was the best time to work hard, work fast and work well.  The Jewish historian Josephus noted that one could even find the pagan populace in the theater at dawn, enjoying God's air conditioning along with the dramatic productions. Dawn was the busiest time at the temple, as priests bustled about preparing the offerings for the new day. Pious Jews and Essenes took these earliest morning hours to offer prayers and praises to their God. 

We expend a lot of effort to keep our “real” selves a secret. In some areas of our lives, we are asleep and live in darkness. We are not even engaging the spiritual battle. Keeping secrets, particularly ones involving our own behavior, is a full-time job. As Thomas Carlyle, the 19th-century British writer, once noted, “He who has a secret should not only hide it but hide that he has to hide.” St. Ignatius of Loyola, in his Spiritual Exercises, says that temptations are like secret lovers. He uses the image of a young woman who has a good father. The secret lover wants to stay secret, in the dark, trying to get you to do things you know the father, who loves you and wants the best for you, would not approve. St. Ignatius says sin is like that. Keep everything in the dark, hidden, and secret. I wonder if the reason Paul encourages us to wake up is that we are asleep when it comes to dangers that confront us spiritually. We spend too much time covering up who we really are.

Paul reminds us that since we cannot separate the eschatological from the ethical, therefore, we are to lay aside the works of darkness and, using an image drawn from warfare, he urges them to put on the armor of light. We find the image in I Thessalonians 5:8, “But since we belong to the day, let us be sober, and put on the breastplate of faith and love, and for a helmet the hope of salvation.” In addition, in II Corinthians 6:7, we read, “... the power of God; with the weapons of righteousness for the right hand and for the left ...” Warfare and the equipment of war were common sources for ethical metaphors among many writers in Greco-Roman antiquity. For example, the first-century Stoic philosopher and teacher Epictetus compared the challenge of living a virtuous life to a soldier out on campaign. “Each person’s life is a kind of campaign, and a long and complicated one at that. You have to maintain the character of a soldier, and do each separate act at the bidding of the general, if possible divining what he wishes.”[17]  The most famous example of military imagery to describe the Christian life can be found in Ephesians 6:10-17, where the various pieces of the “armor of God” are discussed.

13 Let us live honorably as in the day, not in reveling (κώμοις, carousing, orgies, wild parties) and drunkenness, not in debauchery (κοίταις, literally “beds” or “couch,” thus metaphorically improper/promiscuous sexual relations) and licentiousness (ἀσελγείαις, defined in the BDAG Greek lexicon as “lack of self-constraint which involves one in conduct that violates all bounds of what is socially acceptable expression of sexual desire), not in quarreling (ἔριδι, variously translated as strife, dissension, wrangling and rivalry) and jealousy (ζήλῳ, perhaps better translated more narrowly as envy BDAG understands it to mean “intense negative feelings over another’s achievements or success,” and thus disobedience of the tenth commandment, “You shall not covet.”) He is offering a small version of his vice list. Some other lists of such behaviors are in Romans 1:29; 9:10; I Corinthians 1:11; 3:3; 2 Corinthians 12:20; Galatians 5:21; Philippians 1:15. These activities all threaten the life of the community. They are the inverse of the commandments of the law and hence are the inverse of love. They provide opportunities for self-interest, social divisions, and broken relationships. These activities make for sleep. However, Paul reminds the Romans that in Christ God has awakened them to a new life in the Spirit. We are to live as if the new order were already here.  We must act like what we are, citizens of heaven. Karl Barth refers to Augustine, who said that it was not self-evident that such activities as described in verse 13 are not compatible with walking, as in the day. He goes on to say that this verse ought to sober our naïve talk about the spiritual life of the earth. From the point of view of the Christian individual, we have here a degree of worldliness for which one would justly condemn the church later. He thinks we should ask whether we might not see the worldliness of the Christian individual more radically here and given its true name, whereas the true evil of the later church consists in the fact that the humanity of its members could disguise itself more cleverly. At any rate, a radical admonition is necessary. Its final word is also the first word, to put on Jesus Christ.[18] 14 Instead, put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to gratify its desires (ἐπιθυμίας, lust, inordinate desire, I Thessalonians 4:5 and Ephesians 4:22)We might connect the "armor" to the concrete manifestation of the law fulfilled as love - that is, none other than "the Lord Jesus Christ" himself. As the dawn of "the Day" or any day approaches, by "putting on" the mind of Christ, Christians are completely prepared for and protected from whatever may assail them in the next 24 hours. Or the next two millennia. “Putting on” should remind us of baptism. In Galatians 3:27, he writes that those who have received baptism “have clothed” themselves “with Christ,” which is probably an allusion to the practice of the newly baptized receiving a white robe to put on immediately after baptism. Yet, they must continually renew that life with which baptism has clothed them. In Ephesians 6:12, he reminds his readers that “we” are not contending against flesh and blood, but against principalities, powers, and the rulers of this present darkness, and against the spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places. Chapters 5-8 of the letter provide some of the most treasured lines of Christian Scripture regarding Christ and salvation. Furthermore, in Chapters 9-11 Paul lays out a complex argument for the relationship of the church to the salvation of Israel, as he considers the reconstitution of the people of God in light of Christ. Here Paul expands the notion of salvation from personal transformation to the cosmological and historical saving purposes of God for all creation. The battle is between light and darkness. Paul reminds his readers again of the eschatological tension that exists due to the saving act of God in Christ, and thus, time itself is no longer just a matter of chronology, but of the action of God. 

Most Christians in apostolic times believed the Parousia was at hand and would happen in their lifetime.  Paul has statements that imply he expected Christ’s coming in his lifetime.  However, he also gives the impression that he looked for the attainment of a full life in Christ by his own death. While they expected Christ’s coming imminently, the delay did not shatter the foundations of their faith. Rather, through the risen Lord and the Spirit, eschatological salvation had already become a certainty for believers, so that the length of the remaining span of time was a secondary matter. The “delay” of the coming did not seem to create a crisis. A Christian sense of time is not just clocks and calendars.  It is the tension between the ways of God and our ways, good and evil, light and darkness.  It translates into a way of life. The trial on earth is a night of gloom that precedes the arrival of morning.[19] Paul says that the return of Christ is even more reason for his hearers to contour their lives after the pattern of Christ. He bases his appeal on the fact that they “know what time it is.” There is no time to squabble with the state or their neighbors. He urges them to respect the state and to love their neighbors because their time is short. They must instead be witnesses of what God is doing in the present. In that sense, the vision of Paul is “bifocal.”[20] Paul simultaneously has an eye on two horizons — that which is happening on earth because of the enslaving power of sin in the old age and the in-breaking of the rule of God into this earthly sphere. These verses reveal the apocalyptic vision of Paul, his understanding that this present age is passing away and his certainty that God is ushering in a new age. 

Application

Hope is more important that we know. St. Augustine says that hope has two beautiful daughters: anger at the way things are and courage to see to it they do not remain the way they are. Our dissatisfaction with the present arises out of our hope the future. As Reinhold Niebuhr said: "Nothing that is worth doing can be achieved in our lifetime." Hope always looks ahead, to something greater and better than we have now.

Why is hope so important for your life? This life has an incomplete character. Hope suggests its possible fulfillment. Our hope has its basis in the promise of God. Our hope is not just for our individual lives. Our hope includes the rest of humanity and even the entire creation. We can move toward the future with confidence, patience, and cheerful expectation of the revelation of the will of God for humanity. We hope for the one in whom we believe and love. While the specifics of that future elude us, of course, we know what is most important. The content of the future is Jesus Christ in his final form, as he completes the work begun in his life, death and resurrection and in the sending of the Spirit. The content of our hope is Jesus Christ coming in glory. This hope means pardon for humanity. It means a movement out of darkness and into light. It means transformation and eternal life. The hope is for the completion of the reconciling act of God in Christ. Such redemption means peace between Creator and creation. Slumbering humanity needs to awaken to the significance of the coming of Christ as providing the basis for this hope. Christians offer their witness and service today in light of that hope. We move toward the goal. We live with the hope for the dawn of the great light, but we also have joy over the little lights we experience today. The Holy Spirit is the one who awakens us to this hope.

William Wilberforce lived in England from 1759 to 1833. He was heir to a sizeable fortune. At 23, the people elected him to the Parliament. A few years later, he experienced a powerful conversion. In the movie Amazing Grace, a movie I highly recommend you watch, he wonders if he should give up his political life and devote himself to contemplation and enjoy God. He doubted he could serve God and serve his political vocation. He already had become convinced that slavery was wrong. In one scene (26:03 to 30:25) a table conversation occurs concerning slavery. “We understand you are struggling with whether you should do the work of God or the work of an activist. We humbly suggest that you can do both.” In the following scene (until 36:05), he meets John Newton, the writer of the famous hymn, Amazing Grace, who tells him that he still lives with the ghosts of 20,000 slaves that he delivered to slaveholders on slave ships. He convinces Wilberforce that combating slavery would be doing the work of heaven. “The principles of Christianity require action as well as meditation,” says Newton. Newton told him:

 

“God has raised you up for the good of the church and the good of the nation, maintain your friendship with Pitt, continue in Parliament, who knows that but for such a time as this God has brought you into public life and has a purpose for you.” 

 

Wilberforce recalled the meeting in this way, “When I came away, my mind was in a calm, tranquil state, more humbled, looking more devoutly up to God.” He would lead a boycott of sugar made with the hands of slaves, trying to end the economic stranglehold that slavery had on the nation. In 1807, 220 years ago this year, after 20 years of trying, the slave trade ended in the British Empire. Although the crowning achievement of his attempts to reform British life would be ending slavery, Wilberforce sought many other reforms, including turning people away from gambling, heavy drinking, and promiscuity. He helped raise the moral tone of a whole nation.

One of the criticisms against Wilberforce by his colleagues in the Parliament was that he obeys the preacher in his head. I hope we do not just have a preacher for a few minutes on Sunday morning. I hope we carry one around with us in our heads. As leaders in the community, I hope you are finding your way to practice your faith in those places. It can take persistence. One can become tired. In 1791, John Wesley wrote what would be the final letter of his life to encourage Wilberforce. 

 

“Unless God has raised you for this very thing, you will be worn out by the opposition of men and devils. But if God be for you, who can be against you? Are all of them together stronger than God? O be not weary of well doing! Go on, in the name of God and in the power of his might, till even American slavery (the vilest that ever saw the sun) shall vanish away before it.” 

 

In later decades, Abraham Lincoln remembered Wilberforce, saying he recalled the man who ended the slave trade, but could not name one man who tried to keep it alive. Sadly, trafficking in persons is still a global threat to the lives and freedom of millions of men, women, and children. Burma and North Korea still sponsor slavery. Most human trafficking today involves organized crime groups who make huge sums of money at the expense of the freedom of others. In his book Not for Sale, David Batstone says that 27 million slaves exist in our world today.

As Paul suggests, even the people of the church need to wake up. 

We need to wake up to our families. We influence our spouses, children, grandparents, and grandchildren, far more than we know. We need to be sure that what we bring them is the light of day, and not the night of confusion. We need to wake up to the moment. We need to seize the day.

Ann Wells shares the story of her sister dying. She then shares this incident. "My brother-in-law opened the bottom drawer of my sister's bureau and lifted out a tissue-wrapped package.  "'This,' he said, 'is not a slip.  This is lingerie.' "He discarded the tissue and handed me the slip. It was exquisite: silk, handmade and trimmed with a cobweb of lace. It still had the astronomical price tag attached. "'Jan bought this the first time we went to New York, at least eight or nine years ago. She never wore it. She was saving it for a special occasion. Well, I guess this is the occasion.' "He took the slip from me and put it on the bed with the other clothes we were taking to the mortician. His hands lingered on the soft material for a moment, and then he slammed the drawer shut and turned to me. "'Don't ever save anything for a special occasion. Every day you're alive is a special occasion.' As Ann reflected upon that moment, she wrote: 

 

I'm trying to recognize those moments now and cherish them.  I'm not 'saving' anything; we use our good china and crystal for every special event - such as losing a pound, getting the sink unstopped, the first camellia blossom. "'Someday' and 'one of these days' are losing their grip on my vocabulary.  If it's worth seeing or hearing or doing, I want to see and hear and do it now. 

 

 Please, wake up to the moment.

We need to wake up to God. We often discover God in the strangest places. We might discover God in the smile of a child, the hug of a parent, or the simple greeting in church by someone you know really meant it when he or she asked you how things were going with you.

Frankly, as Paul puts it, salvation is nearer to us now than when we were believers. Therefore, Paul invites his readers, and us, to put on Christ, the source of faith, hope, and love. Instead of focusing too much upon sin, which can in fact give it more power over you, focus on Christ. Make him more part of your life. Take him with you, to your family, to your friends, to your work, and to wherever you go. That will wake you up. In fact, come to think of it, it may also wake up those around you. You will have increasingly less to hide and increasingly more to share.



[1] Sanday and Headlam have a discussion on the history of agapa.  Eros had a strong association with sexual passion, and then to any strong passionate affection.  Plato used it to describe the desire of the soul for higher things.  New Testament writers used an evil form by epithumia.  Phileo referred to domestic affections.  New Testament writers use it 22 times, usually for the relationship between father and son.  Agapa in the New Testament expresses God’s love for humanity and humanity’s love for God, primarily because it better expressed the greater intellectual desire and the greater severity.  The New Testament distinction is between agapa and epithumia.

[2] Sanday and Headlam note these three elements of the Christian teaching on love.

[3] (see Barrett, 251).

[4] (James D.G. Dunn, Word Biblical Commentary [Dallas: Word Books, 1988], 777-78).

[5] (Pannenberg, Systematic Theology 1998, 1991), Volume 3, 68-69)

[6] (Barth, Epistle to the Romans 1918, 1921, 1933)494.

[7] (Barth, Church Dogmatics 2004, 1932-67)IV.2 [68.1] 732-3)

[8]  --From England Dan and John Ford Coley, "Love Is the Answer." YouTube has several versions of them singing this song.

[9](Theological Issues in the Letters of Paul [Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1997], 279-297).

[10] (Barth, Church Dogmatics 2004, 1932-67)IV. 2, 66.4)

[11] (Barth, Church Dogmatics 2004, 1932-67)IV.3 71.2)

[12] (Barth, Epistle to the Romans 1918, 1921, 1933)497-500.

[13] --William James, "The energies of men," 1907, first published in Science, N.S. 25 (No. 635), 322-23. psychclassics.yorku.ca. Retrieved May 30, 2016.

[14] --Martin Luther King Jr., "The world house," in Where Do We Go from Here: Chaos or Community? (Harper & Row, 1967). umn.edu. Retrieved May 30, 2016.

[15] (Pannenberg, Systematic Theology 1998, 1991)Volume II, 366.

[16] (Barth, Church Dogmatics 2004, 1932-67)III.4, 56.1)

[17] Discourse 3.24.34

[18] (Barth, Church Dogmatics 2004, 1932-67)II.2, 38.3, p. 729)

[19] Pannenberg, Systematic Theology, Volume II, 366.

[20](Theological Issues in the Letters of Paul [Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1997], 279-297).