Luke 24:1-12 (NRSV)
But on the first day of the week, at early
dawn, they came to the tomb, taking the spices that they had prepared. 2 They
found the stone rolled away from the tomb, 3 but when they went in,
they did not find the body. 4 While they were perplexed about this,
suddenly two men in dazzling clothes stood beside them. 5 The women
were terrified and bowed their faces to the ground, but the men said to them,
“Why do you look for the living among the dead? He is not here, but has risen. 6
Remember how he told you, while he was still in Galilee, 7 that
the Son of Man must be handed over to sinners, and be crucified, and on the
third day rise again.” 8 Then they remembered his words, 9 and
returning from the tomb, they told all this to the eleven and to all the rest. 10
Now it was Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, and the
other women with them who told this to the apostles. 11 But these
words seemed to them an idle tale, and they did not believe them. 12 But
Peter got up and ran to the tomb; stooping and looking in, he saw the linen
cloths by themselves; then he went home, amazed at what had happened.
Luke 24:1-12 is the story of the discovery of the empty tomb. The
source is Mark.
The places Luke diverges from Mark I have put in red.[1]
In the account of
the discovery of the empty tomb by Luke, we find the women coming to the tomb,
unconcerned about who will roll the stone away. Luke also has the disciples
remain in Jerusalem, where his account of Pentecost will take place in the
opening chapters of Acts. Luke stresses the emptiness of the tomb, as well as
what others have done to the body of Jesus. His story will end in the temple
with the disciples praising God, even as the Passion narrative began in the Temple. Note the whole of Luke’s account occurs in
one day.
As we read this
story of the appearances in the context of the crime perpetrated by religious
and political authorities, we must not fall prey to the well-intentioned effort
of some preachers and theologians to make the scandal and the mystery
comprehensible by suggesting that these events mirror the familiar. We may try
to do so with illuminating analogies such as the rhythms of sleep and waking,
death and birth, the change of seasons, life passages, and so on. We run the
risk of domesticating the Easter victory over death as the supreme instance of
generic immortality. We can try to make the
particular and unique event of Good Friday and Easter become a familiar universal
that relates to some dimension of philosophical anthropology or cosmology. This
event, however, is a new, unique, particular, and unrepeatable point time and
space.[2]
However, on the first day of the week, at early
dawn, they [The names of the women differ
from Mark. Luke has transported Joanna
from 8:3, identified as the wife of Chuza.
He mentions other women, again transporting from 8:2-3.] The women came to the tomb, taking the spices that
they had prepared. [First, the women see the
tomb of Jesus, prepared spices and oil the evening before, and then rested on
the Sabbath. In Mark, they saw from afar
and bought spices to anoint the body after the Sabbath. There is no mention of the intent to anoint
the body.] [Third,
the women do not worry about who will roll away the stone.] 2 They found the stone rolled
away from the tomb, 3 but when they went in, they did not find the
body. [There is a stronger stress on the
emptiness of the tomb by this reference.] 4 While they were perplexed, describing
the effect of the Easter miracle. They are still trying to comprehend Jesus in
death as they did in life, wholly in human terms.] Thus, while perplexed about this, that is, the emptiness of
the tomb, suddenly they saw two men. [Two
men, instead of one, who appear again in Acts 1:10.]
This might be a reminder of the Mount of Transfiguration, as Jesus stood
transfigured before then with Moses and Elijah on either side. That dialogue
focused on the "exodus" or "departure" which Jesus would
soon accomplish at Jerusalem. The empty
tomb offers mute evidence that such a departure has now taken place. The men in dazzling clothes stood beside them. 5 The women were
terrified and bowed their faces to the ground, but the men said to them, “Why
do you look for the living among the dead? This proverb had become well
known. He is not here, but has risen. 6
Remember how he told you; here is the heart of the scene. The purpose
is to present Jesus as victor over death. While
he was still in Galilee, 7 that the Son of Man must be handed over
to sinners, and be crucified, and on the third day rise again.” [The statement of the angels is slightly different
from Mark.] 8
Then they remembered his words, the women have an immediately
favorable response. [Verses 6b-8 differs
considerably. In Mark, they are told to
go to Galilee with the disciples, while here they are reminded of a saying of
Jesus made in Galilee to the effect that Jesus must suffer and die.] 9 Further, returning from the tomb, they told all this
to the eleven and to all the rest. 10 Now it was Mary Magdalene,
Joanna, Mary the mother of James, and the other women with them who told this
to the apostles. [They share the message
with others, while in Mark they remain silent.] 11 However, these words seemed to them an idle tale, describing
the response of the disciples, contrasting to that of the women. The testimony
of the women does not engender faith. Further, they did not believe them. 12 But Peter got up and ran to
the tomb; stooping and looking in, this seems uncharacteristically cautious
and timid, he saw the linen cloths by
themselves; seeing the same thing as the women did, then he went home, amazed, where we can contrast this response to
the believing response of the women. Thus, instead of running out with a word
to proclaim, Peter slips away “wondering to himself” at what had happened.
In
the account of the discovery of the empty tomb by Luke, we find the women
coming to the tomb, unconcerned about who will roll the stone away. The
disciples are in Jerusalem. This passage stresses the emptiness of the tomb. The women did not just peek
timidly in the doorway. They entered the
tomb and proceeded to search high and low for Jesus. Standing in the midst of this Easter miracle,
the women are "at a loss" or "perplexed" about the
whereabouts of Jesus' body. They were
still trying to comprehend Jesus in death as they did in life--in wholly human
terms. The empty tomb offers mute
evidence that such a departure has now taken place. 'Why do you look for the living among the
dead?" was a well-known proverbial saying.
Contrast Luke's favorable presentation of these women with the lukewarm response of Peter. They just spoke idle tales. Once Peter
arrives at the tomb, uncharacteristic caution and timidity restrict him. Holding himself back, Peter gingerly "stoops
down" or "peers in" to the darkened tomb. He too witnesses its emptiness and the
discarded grave clothes. Nevertheless, unlike
the women, he does not remember Jesus' words or believe a miracle has taken
place. Instead of running out with a
word to proclaim, Peter slips away, “wondering to himself” about what he has
witnessed. The disciples did not believe because of the report of the
women. It is not so much that the disciples just did not believe. Rather, they
believed something else. If people say they do not believe God raised Jesus
from the dead, it means they believe something else more strongly. Easter challenges
our certainties. Experience teaches us that death wins. Everyone succumbs to
it. Easter raises the question of whether we can be so sure that death truly
wins. It opens the door to the possibility that while death is real, death is
not final. The resurrection of Jesus tells us that God has the final word. God says
life will have the final word. [3]
When all we see is
death, we search for life. We seek the living among the dead.
My childhood
fascination with the results of the explorations of science has remained with
me. Yes, the first efforts of launching into space in the 1960s and 1970s had
me glued to the television. Whether a spacewalk or a moonwalk, such scientific
accomplishments made my imagination soar. Of course, along with that is science
fiction. Traveling through the galaxy or even to different galaxies always gets
my imagination going. Yes, I like Star Trek and Star Wars. I imagine that as
long as humans have been looking at the stars, they have wondered if there is
life on distant planets.
We live in a world full of sin, darkness, and death. Think
of the violence through a radical and militant Islam that we have seen again in
Brussels. Think of the violence displayed by ISIS against all persons, but
especially Christians, throughout the Middle East, where we witness a form of
religious genocide. Yes, we live in a world of sin, death, and darkness. It
seems overwhelming.
Yet, Easter changes everything. As followers of Jesus, we
do not just lament the presence of darkness. We do our part bring the light of
Christ into it.
First, Easter changes the way we look
at Jesus. Easter is both the most
powerful and the most challenging Sunday on which to preach each year. The
church asks people to believe things difficult to believe. When Thomas says to
the other disciples, 'Unless I see … I
will not believe,” we can identify with him. I understand the difficulty. I
have family and friends who will say to me, quite skeptically, almost as if
they think I am stupid, “You do not really believe that, do you?” Behind the
question is the modern skeptic that always wonders how we can “know” anything
to be true. Behind it also is the post-modern question of authenticity. Do you
really believe or are you just saying you do? Well, in I Corinthians 15, we
have a list of witnesses to the appearances of Jesus after his death. These
witnesses lived and died for what they believed. The first Easter changed their
lives, and continues to change the lives of people – like you and me.
Second, Easter changes the way we look at
God. The church makes the claim that if people are to know God, they
will have to look to this Jewish man, Jesus of Nazareth. Everything Christians
know about God, Christians discover there. In particular, we know that God is
love because the Son died for us and received new life.
Third, Easter changes the way we look at what
makes a human life whole. Even if one could “prove” it, it would not
be enough. An historical event does not change your life. What does change your
life is when you entrust yourself to its truth.[4]
When we come to the resurrection, the church is not asking you to make a
historical judgment. Deciding an event is historical does not change your life.
The church is asking you to consider your core values and beliefs. The church
is asking you to look at what gives your life its meaning and power. The church
is asking you to become a disciple, a follower, of Jesus Christ to transform
this world of sin, darkness, and death into a place that reflects our creation
in the image of God, reflects light, and brings life.
People sometimes
complain that human life is short. For some, of course, it may well be. That is
what makes the death of young so tragic. We can imagine all that might have
been. However, if we have the blessing of a long life, the problem with which
life confronts us may not be that life is so short. Life may well be long enough.
Beneath the concern for its brevity may well be that we have wasted a lot of
it. If you are fortunate to have had a generous among of chronological time,
the issue is how you have invested it. If we have spent our time on surface
matters like gaining more stuff or on worthless activity, then the approach of
death makes us realize that life has passed us by almost before we knew it was
passing. We make our lives short by wasting it. With the exception of the death
of the young, of course, life is sufficiently long, of course, if you know how
to use it.[5]
Lloyd Douglas, in The Robe, has Marcelus, the Roman
centurion who had the robe of Jesus become a Christian and tells his fiancée the story of Jesus. She
responds, "It's a beautiful story, Marcellus, but we don't have to do
anything about it, do we? Let's leave it
just where it is." Marcellus says,
"That's just it, I cannot forget it.
Because it happened, things can never be the same for me
again."
Fourth, Easter changes the way we look at human
destiny. After all, we live in a world where death is so final. We live in a Good Friday sort of world. The friend of these women had died
Friday. They must have experienced the
same pain any of us feels when a loved dies. For many people, death is the end
of the story. God had a different idea. The resurrection of Jesus means that the
worst thing is never the last thing.[6] Part
of the purpose of such a hope is that it invades our present world of sin,
darkness, and death in a way that it gives us the courage to move forward in
confronting the challenges of our lives.[7] Easter
tells us that it is never too late to have hope.
Because of Easter, those who follow the living Christ are always seeing life where others see death. The world is not a cold, lifeless, rocky, death-like, dark place, but a world with a hope and future. We live and work in the present, no matter how darkness seems to rule for its “hour,” with that future in mind. Paul says to the Corinthians, "Therefore, my beloved, be steadfast, immovable, always excelling in the work of the Lord, because you know that in the Lord your labor is not in vain" (I Corinthians 15:58). God turned over a rock and revealed life. That is the best news this planet has ever received!
Because of Easter, those who follow the living Christ are always seeing life where others see death. The world is not a cold, lifeless, rocky, death-like, dark place, but a world with a hope and future. We live and work in the present, no matter how darkness seems to rule for its “hour,” with that future in mind. Paul says to the Corinthians, "Therefore, my beloved, be steadfast, immovable, always excelling in the work of the Lord, because you know that in the Lord your labor is not in vain" (I Corinthians 15:58). God turned over a rock and revealed life. That is the best news this planet has ever received!
[1] Ludemann is helpful here.
[2] Alan E. Lewis, Between Cross and Resurrection: A
Theology of Holy Saturday (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001), 59-60.
[3] http://www.workingpreacher.org/preaching.aspx?commentary_id=558
Gary R. Koester
[4] As Paul Tillich (Systematic Theology, Vol. Two,
Part III. II. 6) puts it, memorably, I think, “A wrong faith can destroy the
meaning of a life; a wrong historical judgment cannot.” The truth of the gospel
is not just for the head. The truth of the gospel is for heart and life. Such
truth and such change require people to look at their lives in a different way.
One must now live life in reference to Jesus, and not just in reference to
self.
[5] It is not that we have a short time to live, but that we
waste a lot of it. Life is long enough, and a sufficiently generous amount has
been given to us for the highest achievements if it were all well invested. But
when it is wasted in heedless luxury, and spent on no good activity, we are
forced at last by death's final constraint to realize that it has passed away
before we knew it was passing. So it is: We are not given a short life, but we
make it short, and we are not ill-supplied, but wasteful of it ... Life is long
if you know how to use it.--Seneca.
[6] Frederick Buechner: “Resurrection means the worst thing
is never the last thing.”
[7] Hope gives us the courage to confront our circumstances
and the capacity to surmount them. For all my patients, hope, true hope, has
proved as important as any medication I might prescribe or any procedure I
might perform.- Jerome Groopman, The Anatomy
of Hope, 2004, xiv
Good point trying to understand Jesus in human terms. Don't we all! This is really good liked the 5 points. all true Again every Sunday should be a celebration of His resurrection and what ti means . He is risen changes everything .-Lyn Eastman
ReplyDelete