Saturday, February 9, 2019

Luke 5:1-11



Raphael: Depart from me
Luke 5:1-11 (NRSV)

Once while Jesus was standing beside the lake of Gennesaret, and the crowd was pressing in on him to hear the word of God, 2 he saw two boats there at the shore of the lake; the fishermen had gone out of them and were washing their nets. 3 He got into one of the boats, the one belonging to Simon, and asked him to put out a little way from the shore. Then he sat down and taught the crowds from the boat. 4 When he had finished speaking, he said to Simon, “Put out into the deep water and let down your nets for a catch.” 5 Simon answered, “Master, we have worked all night long but have caught nothing. Yet if you say so, I will let down the nets.” 6 When they had done this, they caught so many fish that their nets were beginning to break. 7 So they signaled their partners in the other boat to come and help them. And they came and filled both boats, so that they began to sink. 8 But when Simon Peter saw it, he fell down at Jesus’ knees, saying, “Go away from me, Lord, for I am a sinful man!” 9 For he and all who were with him were amazed at the catch of fish that they had taken; 10 and so also were James and John, sons of Zebedee, who were partners with Simon. Then Jesus said to Simon, “Do not be afraid; from now on you will be catching people.” 11 When they had brought their boats to shore, they left everything and followed him.


Luke 5:1-11 (Year C Epiphany 5) relates the miracle of the draught of fish, as Jesus teaches and performs a miracle, leading to Simon recognizing Jesus as Lord and the first four disciples leaving everything to follow him. This material borrows from three passages: Mark 1:16, 1:19, 4:1-2, 1:17, 20, and either became the basis for or derived from a common source of John 21:1-14 and the appearance of the risen Lord. Luke’s genius was to remove both stories from their “original” literary setting and bring them together. Luke chooses this way to narrate the enlistment of the first followers of Jesus. Luke substitutes the simple call we find in Mark of the first four disciples for the story of a miraculous catch of fish that culminates in the recruitment of Peter, leaving Andrew implied in Peter saying “we” were fishing, along with his companions, James and John.

The effect of the placement of the text provides a psychologically plausible background for the call of the disciples by Jesus and their response of following Jesus, making it all less surprising sudden.  According to Luke’s account, Jesus had already embarked upon a profoundly popular ministry in Galilee.  Now, in chapter 5, Luke begins to develop another aspect of Jesus' message -- his desire to put together a team of disciples to work with him. It demonstrates the nature of authentic response to the ministry of Jesus. 

This story shows a methodology in the Synoptic Gospels to which we need to be alert. The historical life of Jesus had ambiguity to it, evidenced in how difficult it was for disciples and the crowds to understand him and how religious leaders would oppose him. However, the gospel writers are writing from the standpoint of their faith in Jesus as Messiah, Lord, and Son of God. Since most people could not read, they anticipated the reading of their gospel narratives to other people of faith. Thus, among episodes involving biographical stories, teachings, healings, and exorcisms, which have ambiguity built into them, they would narrate episodes that made it clear who Jesus was. In this case, this story has features like that of a resurrection appearance to Peter, even as described in the transfiguration story. Luke uses the idealized narrative of the call of the disciples found in Mark and creates his own idealized account of a disclosure of the identity of Jesus to Peter, one that anticipates the appearance of the risen Lord to Peter. It becomes a symbolic actualization of the saying of Jesus regarding making the disciples fishers of people. It expresses the delight in the tradition to elaborate a saying of Jesus with a miracle story.[1] None of the accounts are history, but presentations of an ideal response to the invitation of Jesus. The discrepancies Luke introduces are a small price to pay for the enriched elements of the notion of call and witness that we find here.[2] One way to read the gospel narratives is that they provide anticipations of the end, resurrection, during the ministry of Jesus. 

Luke 5:1-3 sets the location of the call and miracle. Mark 4:1-2, providing the setting for the chapter of parables, inspires this part of the account in Luke. Jesus is standing by the Lake of Gennesaret. The crowd presses around him as the listen to the word of God (τὸν λόγον τοῦ θεοῦ). Jesus sees two boats at the edge of the water, where the anglers had gotten out of them and were washing their nets. He gets into a boat that belonged to Simon and asked him to put out a little from the shore. From his watery perch, Jesus can sit and address the crowds, while Simon, laboring over his nets, keeping a sharp eye on his boat, hears every word. At this point, the first interest of Luke is Simon. Luke had already foreshadowed the relationship between Jesus and Simon in 4:38‑39 when Jesus heals Simon's mother‑in‑law. By the time Jesus appears on the shores of the lake of Gennesaret, the fishing grounds of Simon, he is a known figure to Simon with an established record of accomplishment. His family has once before experienced Jesus' healing touch. This time Jesus encounters Simon not as a healer but as a teacher.

Jesus enters the sphere of the life of this man. We see a quick succession from the scene of the action of the Word of Jesus and the sign that accompanies it. If we understand the incident in this way, we can see the parallel with Moses, Isaiah, and Jeremiah.[3] Peter plays a key role in this gospel, and thus he is the first disciple characterized by Luke. In the apostolic list in 6:14, he is simply Simon. The reader of Luke also scarcely encounters the Peter who struggles and falters, as in Mark, Matthew, and John. Instead, the narrative of Luke presents Peter much more positively. This positive portrayal prepares a reader for the Peter of the Acts narrative, a strong missionary who leads well and rarely stumbles. One can understand Luke’s particular characterization of Peter through that which Luke omits from the narrative of Mark and the additional details Luke adds about Peter’s life. First, Luke does not include the gospel traditions about the rebuke of Peter (Mark 8:32-33/Matthew 16:22-23) after the passion prediction. Second, Luke does not record the specific censure of Peter in the garden of Gethsemane. In Mark and Matthew, we find both recording Jesus’ reprimand of Peter (Mark 14:37/Matthew 26:40), in Luke Jesus addresses an indefinite group of sleeping disciples (Luke 22:45-46). Luke also reports additional information about Peter that bolsters his image. In Luke 22:31-34, even though Peter will deny Jesus three times, Jesus provides a unique assurance to Peter, lest he fall into the hands of the devil. Finally, Luke is the only one of the synoptic writers to grace Peter with an individual experience of the resurrection (Luke 24:34).

Luke now offers an account of the miracle (4-9a) and the call of Simon and the disciples (9b-11). It has a close parallel to John 21:1-11, where the risen Jesus appears to Peter and the disciples on the Sea of Galilee in connection with a miraculous catch of fish.  Indeed, some scholars suggest that Luke may have been trying to set a pre-resurrection precedent for that post-resurrection fishing trip.  The two stories are versions of the same tradition. Luke takes a teaching story and transforms it into an epiphany experience. The crowd has disappeared. Their swift vanishing act also indicates that Luke may have woven two stories together at this point. Jesus now turns his full attention to Simon, whose nets he has finally washed and readied for the next evening's fishing expedition. In verse 4, When he had finished speaking, he said to Simon, in a saying bound to the context, Put out into the deep water and let down your nets for a catch. Jesus' command should have brought raised eyebrows and incredulous looks from Simon and his fellow fishers. Prime fishing hours were long past.  Simon answered, “Master, we have worked all night long (wearisome toil or even travail) but have caught nothing. Yet if you say so, I will let down the nets.” Simon's reply reflects the fence he was still straddling at this point. Having witnessed Jesus perform a healing miracle in his own home and having now heard Jesus preach the Good News, Simon knows there is something special about Jesus. Simon feels compelled to explain to Jesus his fishing experience for the day.  Although he makes sure that Jesus is aware of the fruitlessness of this endeavor, Simon agrees to follow the command of Jesus, his new "Master." In verses 6-7, Luke now emphasizes the enormity of the miracle performed by Jesus. When they had done this, they caught so many fish that their nets were beginning to break. Therefore, they signaled their partners in the other boat, suggesting they had not journeyed far from shore, to come and help them. Moreover, they came and filled both boats, so that they began to sink. The details provided by Luke testify to the miraculous nature of this huge catch of fish. Simon is at last fully convinced of Jesus' divine power and presence. However, in verse 8, when Simon Peter, indicative of his impending new identity as a disciple saw it, he fell down at Jesus’ knees, saying, “Go away from me, Lord (Κύριε), for I am a sinful (ἁμαρτωλός) man!” Here is an authentic response to Jesus, both in his obedience and in his awareness of his sinfulness in the presence of Jesus. As in the similar incident in John, Peter is ashamed in the presence of Jesus because he had disowned him three times and fled the crucifixion scene.  In the present narrative context, Peter’s response makes little sense. However, after the crucifixion, such guilt becomes understandable. Yet, one need not see his admission of sin as further evidence that Luke took this account from a post‑Resurrection confession by Peter. The terminology Luke employs expresses a general, moral sense of unworthiness and fear‑‑which all who find themselves in the presence of divinity would naturally feel. Note, also, that in Peter's outburst, he no longer addresses Jesus as "master" but instead switches to kyrios or "Lord" ‑‑ a term that in these circumstances conveys far more than a respectful "sir."  Moses, Isaiah, and Jeremiah have this instinct as well, as they try to escape the divine call. Jesus invades the sphere of this man, but Peter wants him to depart from his sphere because he does not feel worthy. The call of Jesus has gone forth to the sinner. In fact, as the call of Levi reminds us, Jesus has come to call sinners rather than the righteous. The sinful man becomes worthy due to the call of Jesus and is therefore able to witness.[4] For he and all who were with him were amazed (θάμβος) wonder combined with fear, suggesting recognition of the divine) at the catch of fish that they had taken; and so also were James and John, sons of Zebedee, who were partners with Simon. For some scholars, this feels like an awkward reference to the presence of other future disciples. If he has Mark in front of him, he is tipping his hat to the call narrative in that Gospel. Luke immediately refocuses attention on the relationship between Jesus and Simon. Jesus does not in fact depart from the sinner but calls him.  In verse 10, Luke aims the discipleship charge specifically toward Simon. Then Jesus said to Simon, in words like those we find in Mark, Do not be afraid; from now on you will be catching (ζωγρῶν, meaning “to capture alive” and “to revive or make alive”) people. Luke avoids the violence suggested by the net in the call narrative of Mark. The first meaning of the term Luke uses fits well with the acts of hunting or fishing, the disciples’ former life, and the second meaning denotes the life on which they are about to embark. Through the plurality of meanings in this verb, one can perceive the depth of Jesus’ teaching and the genius of his apostolic call. The first apostles were to capture human beings while they were biologically alive, but through their capture, the disciples would make them spiritually alive. The miracle is a symbol of what Simon will experience in his fishing for those who will respond by entering the rule of God.  Simon is a leading missionary in Jesus' cause.  Note Luke’s "you shall be taking them alive," = "catching." What anglers do to fish is not good for the fish.  However, Luke has the implication of saving from death and preserved for life. the story concludes in verse 11: When they had brought their boats to shore, they left everything and followed him. This response by the first disciples goes beyond the amazement of the crowds in the response to Jesus. Thus, although Jesus directs to the call to Simon, the undefined “they” respond to the call. The response is immediate and dramatic. The anglers bring their boats ashore abandon them, even with the fish still in them. In Luke's "call" text, the power of this charge, of this invitation to be in service to Christ, is the only detail that is of concern. The particulars of the lives these anglers leave behind are neither Luke's concern nor theirs. Dropping everything, they follow Jesus into a new life of discipleship. Jesus calls them to come to him, to follow him, and to make something specific of them. They will make a transition from what they made of themselves to what Jesus wants to make of them, to make them fish for people is to make them apostles, men of a commission that Jesus gives them, the commission to seek and gather people. These men have a new calling in their seeking and gathering. To fulfill this calling, they must leave their nets and boats to follow Jesus. Jesus calls them to this discipleship. We see here the meaning and purpose of the election of individuals for the proclamation to the many, for the creation of the church with its task in relation to the world. They will share in his prophetic office.[5]



[1] (Bultmann, The History of the Synoptic Tradition, 1921, 1931, 1958), 217-8, 230; (Jeremias, New Testament Theology: The Proclamation of Jesus, 1971), 87.

[2] (Barth K. , Church Dogmatics, 2004, 1932-67)IV.3 [71.4] 589-91.

[3] (Barth K. , Church Dogmatics, 2004, 1932-67)IV.3 [71.4] 590.

[4] (Barth K. , Church Dogmatics, 2004, 1932-67)IV.3 [71.4] 590.

[5] (Barth K. , Church Dogmatics, 2004, 1932-67)II.2 [35.3] 443-4.

2 comments:

  1. Thank for this posting...it speaks to many of my wondering!-Emily Morin

    ReplyDelete
  2. enjoyed this I think we all experienced wht you desribed-Lynn Eastman

    ReplyDelete