Thursday, May 10, 2018

Luke 24:44-53


Luke 24:44-53

44 Then he said to them, “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you—that everything written about me in the law of Moses, the prophets, and the psalms must be fulfilled.” 45 Then he opened their minds to understand the scriptures, 46 and he said to them, “Thus it is written, that the Messiah is to suffer and to rise from the dead on the third day, 47 and that repentance and forgiveness of sins is to be proclaimed in his name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem. 48 You are witnesses of these things. 49 And see, I am sending upon you what my Father promised; so stay here in the city until you have been clothed with power from on high.”

50 Then he led them out as far as Bethany, and, lifting up his hands, he blessed them. 51 While he was blessing them, he withdrew from them and was carried up into heaven. 52 And they worshiped him, and returned to Jerusalem with great joy; 53 and they were continually in the temple blessing God.

Luke 24:44-53 (Ascension Day and part of Year B Third Sunday of Easter) shares the final commission of the risen Lord, expressing the formation of the missionary obligations of the community.[1] I offer biblical exegesis, theological synthesis of the Gospel and the Book of Acts, and a pastoral exhortation. My attention to the canon directs us to theological coherence. 

Summary

The core message is that the risen Christ opens minds, fulfills Scripture, empowers witnesses through the Spirit, and forms a joyful, grateful, missionary community grounded in love rather than performance.

This reflection highlights the profound significance of Jesus' final commission. These verses serve to conclude Luke’s Gospel, emphasize the necessity of messianic suffering, and set the stage for the Book of Acts.

Crucially, Jesus opens his disciples' minds to understand that his suffering, death, and resurrection fulfill the Old Testament prophecies, revealing God's faithfulness to Israel through a new lens—the "Christ event." This suggests a post-resurretion hermeneutic understanding through encounter with the risen Christ. This understanding empowers them for a vital mission: to be "witnesses" of these facts, proclaiming repentance and forgiveness of sins in Jesus' name to all nations, starting in Jerusalem. Their personal experience and faith make them trustworthy attestors of this historical revelation. Thus, witness is both historical testimony and faith-based or attestation to their saving meaning. Christian proclamation reses on historical revelation, not abstract myth, and that faith and fact are inseparable. This leads to the ecclesiological claim that without witnesses the saving action of God wild not b known and that trusting the original witnesses is essential for later believers.

The passage also underscores the promise of the Father – the Holy Spirit – which will clothe them with power from on high, marking the foundation of the church. such a theology of the Spirit, traced to Zechariah, Mary, Simeon, the apostles, and Pentecost, underscores continuity that mission follows empowerment. The ascension itself, followed by the disciples' joyful return to the Temple, emphasizes themes of worship and gratitude. Thus, ascension is not absence, but exaltation and fulfillment, ending the gospel the way it began. Such joy is a consequence of revelation, a marker of authentic witness, and a recurring effect of mission in Acts.

The application moves toward an ecclesiology that reflects the emphasis in Luke on meals, community, and shared joy. It calls for an "open mind," urging us to interpret scripture through Christ's actions and the "rule of love," as exemplified by St. Lawrence. Ultimately, the church is presented not as an audience but as a family, built by genuine followers, continuing the spiritual movement that began with Jesus at a dinner table, proclaiming God's triumph over death.

Introduction

These final scenes serve three purposes. One is to close the initial “orderly account” of Luke. Two is to summarize an important motif of the gospel, that the necessity of messianic suffering. Three is to serve as a literary bridge to his next book. The focus of this appearance shifts from the disciples to the message Jesus brought to them. This account occurs on Easter evening, the risen Lord giving the disciples their marching order while at the dinner table. An important truth is that what God has done in and through Jesus of Nazareth is a fulfillment of the Torah, the prophets, and the psalms. The event of revelation occurs in the process of a history of the Jewish people. The end of this gospel reminds us of the many places in Luke that have referred portions of the Old Testament. In language like that of 24:37, thereby emphasizing the importance of understanding the continuity between Israel’s Scripture and the new event God has enacted in Jesus’ death and resurrection, the risen Lord opened their minds to understand the scripture considering what the God of Israel has done now, through Jesus of Nazareth. Thus it is written, that the Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead, 24.47 and that repentance and forgiveness (a rare moment when this word occurs on the lips of Jesus)[2] of sins should be preached in his name, giving the name of Jesus a holy and sacred meaning, to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem. 24.48 You are witnesses (μάρτυρες) of these things. The witness declares facts personally known, which in this case is the history of Jesus. This witness also declares the significance of this history by an emphatic appeal for their recognition in faith. It can only be believed and then attested by proclamation. The witness to facts and the witness to truth are the same, the unavoidable result of the fac that the Gospel presents a historical revelation. The evangelical message has a historical foundation. At issue are facts that took place in the illuminating light of history at a specific time and place, facts on which one can rely. These persons are fitted for the task because from experience they can witness to the factuality of the suffering and resurrection of Jesus and have grasped in faith the significance of Jesus and can thus attest it.[3] 24.49 And behold, the risen Lord speaking of his person and a missionary command,[4] I send the promise of my Father upon you; but stay in the city, until you are clothed with power from on high." Mary recalls the promises God made to the ancestors, to Abraham, and to all his descendants (1:55), and announces God’s faithfulness to this promise. Moreover, Zechariah, in his prophecy in 1:70-73, proclaims that God has shown the mercy he promised long ago and has remembered his covenant. Jesus takes the scroll of Isaiah, reads it aloud in the synagogue and announces that today this scripture has been fulfilled in their hearing (4:18-21). He points them to the divine necessity of the suffering, death, and resurrection of the Messiah. God is at work in Jesus of Nazareth by fulfilling prophecies and expectations of the Old Testament. This act of opening their mind occurs only after Jesus’ death and resurrection, suggesting that only after the Christ event can their minds be opened. The reality of Jesus’ death and resurrection is the event and the lens through which Israel’s Scriptures can be understood. The Christ event continues God’s faithfulness to Israel and at the same time enacts a new understanding of what that faithfulness entails. Another important truth is that they now have a vocation in proclaiming repentance and forgiveness of sins in the name of Jesus to all nations, beginning with Jerusalem, the city toward which the Gospel of Luke moves and a city that is starting point of the Book of Acts. Without human witnesses or testimony, others will not know of the action of God. The original witnesses are essential for this process. They need to be trustworthy witnesses. We need to trust them, even when their testimony seems incredulous. As important as their witness remains for us, they point to an event in which we can share and from which we can develop our witness. Our witness will need to focus upon how the risen Lord has altered our lives. Witness is an important theme in Luke. The Christian mission has taken to all nations this summons to turning or conversion to God in the sense of turning to the one and only true God of Israel and of Jesus Christ.[5] All of this is consistent with a theme in Luke of the concealment of the meaning of the death and resurrection of Jesus. They did not understand the scripture during the life of Jesus and therefore did not comprehend the events that led to his death and resurrection. We learn this in 9:45 and 18:34. In particular, the prophecies of the future destiny of Jesus in Luke 2:48-50, 9:44-45, 18:31-34, 22:22-23 seemed concealed from them. Their lack of comprehension that they exhibited throughout the ministry of Jesus will end as the risen Lord sends upon them what the Father promised. They are to stay in Jerusalem and remain silent, as did Zechariah at the beginning of this gospel. Luke emphasizes the presence and activity of the Spirit in 1:67, where Zechariah is filled with the Spirit and prophesies, in 2:25-27, where the Holy Spirit rests upon Simeon and reveals to him the Messiah, the Spirit overshadows Mary (1:35) in the beginning and at the end the Spirit is the promise of the Father (Acts 1:4-5, 8, 24, 17-18, 2:38). For Luke, the church is founded by the power of the Holy Spirit given through the risen Lord imparting the Spirit to believers. This model of the church needs to be thoughtfully connected to the Pauline way of thinking of Christ as the foundation of the church.[6]

In verses 50-53, the risen Lord leads the disciples away from the dining table for a farewell (verses 50-53).[7] The risen Lord lifted his hands, focusing upon the action of his blessing of the disciples, and the Father carried him to heaven. Such a notion of the exaltation of the Son is in Philippians 2:9, where God highly exalted him, giving him a name above every name. We find it also in I Timothy 3:16, where part of the mystery of the faith is that the Father took up in glory. They worshipped him. They returned with joy to Jerusalem. They continually praised God in the Temple. This gospel begins with Zechariah offering incense in the Temple (1:8-23), Mary offers her song of praise with joy in God who has done wonderful things (1:49), and at the end of the gospel, the disciples return to Jerusalem with great joy and praise God in the Temple. Jesus was in the temple, where he sat among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions (Luke 2:46). As an adult, and the presence of the disciples, Jesus taught the people in the temple, telling them the good news (Luke 20:1). Jesus taught in the temple in the morning, with many people coming to hear him (Luke 20:37-38). With the apostles, those who believed their witness spent much time in the temple, as they broke bread and ate together with glad and generous hearts, as the praised God together (Acts 2:46). Despite the opposition of the religious leaders in Jerusalem, they are teaching and proclaiming Jesus as the Messiah in the temple and at home (Acts 5:20, 25, 42). Gratitude arises from remembering past mercies.[8] We receive more gifts than we realize in life. Could it be that we think we are entitled to them? Gratitude and thankfulness arise from recognizing the gift that so many people give us in life. To focus on gratitude means we do not focus upon that which is beyond our reach right now. Gratitude arises from some sense of contentment.[9] Luke has now reached the goal of his Gospel as the ascension of Jesus to the Father occurs. In Phil 2:9, God highly exalted him, giving him a name above every name, and in I Tim 3:16, the mystery of the faith is that the Father took him up in glory. He uses some apocalyptic motifs, which suggests the connection between this event and the end of history, as we know it. what angels announced to shepherds, that “a Savior, who is the Messiah, the Lord” (Luke 2:8-11) had lived, died, and rose from the dead. Incredibly, they were witnesses of that unbelievable event and by their testimony, many others would also share in their immense joy. Philip proclaims the Messiah to Samaria, where exorcisms and healings occur, and the city has boundless joy (Acts 8:8). Paul and Barnabas, on their journey to Jerusalem, share the story of Gentiles coming to believe in Jesus, and this news brought extraordinary joy to the believers (Acts 15:3).

Application

We like to think we have open minds. Yet, many of us are quite closed. The risen Lord wants an open mind. Here are some examples of having an open mind:

 

Moses said, “Kill every male among the little ones” (Numbers 31:17). But Jesus says, “Let the little children come to me” (Matthew 19:14).

The prophet Amos said that the day of the Lord “is darkness, not light” (Amos 5:18). But our Savior says, “I am the light of the world” (John 8:12).

Psalm 7 said, “Rise up, O Lord, in your anger; lift yourself up against the fury of my enemies” (v. 6). But Jesus says, “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Matthew 5:44).

 

When Christians were arguing over biblical understandings in the 1500s, a group of Scottish leaders discovered that the interpretation of Scripture “does not belong to any private or public person,” nor to any church. Instead, they encouraged Christians to trust the Holy Spirit to guide them, and to focus on “what Christ Jesus himself did and commanded.” Jesus can open our minds to what it means to be faithful Christians in the world today. “We dare not receive or admit any interpretation that is contrary” to the Christian faith, “or to the rule of love,” said the writers of the Scots Confession. Every word in the Bible should be interpreted through our faith in Jesus Christ, and through the rule of love.

The Romans martyred St. Lawrence in 258 AD.  However, we remember him, not for his martyrdom, but for his being Archdeacon of Rome.  His responsibilities included maintaining the sacred vessels of the small, struggling church and distributing alms to the poor.  While he was archdeacon, the governor of Rome took Pope Sextus captive and demanded, "Where is the treasure of the church?"  The Pope would not tell, and they tortured him to death.  He never did tell, but in his agony and pain, Pope Sextus somehow mentioned the name of Archdeacon Lawrence.  They took Lawrence captive.  "Where is the treasure of the church?"  He replied, "Governor, I cannot get it for you instantaneously; but if you give me three days, I will give you the treasure."  The governor agreed.  Lawrence left.  Three days later, he walked into the governor's courtyard followed by a great flood of people.  The governor walked out onto his balcony and said, "Where is the treasure of your church?"  Lawrence stepped forward, and pointed to the crowd that accompanied him, the lame, blind, deaf, nobodies of society, and said, "Here are the treasures of the Christian church."  Are we there with St. Lawrence?  Are you a witness?

These closing scenes are interesting in part because they occur in the simple setting of a dinner table. Any family knows that things at a dinner table to do not always run smoothly.[10] Yet, what happens there is important. As important as numbers are, for numbers represent people, the church is not primarily an audience for a speaker or a band. An audience is a group of unrelated people drawn by a short-lived attraction. It scatters after the performance. Church is more like family or an organism. Any gifted person can attract an audience. Only a genuine follower of Jesus can build a church.[11]

The story of Easter morning will always be at the heart of the Christian faith, because it proclaims that God has conquered death through the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Equally important is the tale of Easter evening, which tells us how a spiritual movement that began with a talk around a table has resulted in communities around the world worshipping and following the risen Lord.



[1] (Jeremias, New Testament Theology: The Proclamation of Jesus, 1971), 305.

[2] (Jeremias, New Testament Theology: The Proclamation of Jesus, 1971), 114

[3] Strathmann, TDNT, IV, 492-3.

[4] (Bultmann, The History of the Synoptic Tradition, 1921, 1931, 1958), 157.

[5] (Pannenberg, Systematic Theology, 1998, 1991)Volume 3, 245.

[6] (Pannenberg, Systematic Theology, 1998, 1991)Volume 3, 15.

[7] (Bultmann, The History of the Synoptic Tradition, 1921, 1931, 1958), 286, defining it as a self-conscious literary work, a literary creation. 

[8] Charles E. Jefferson 

[9] John Sandel, 

[10] In Wishful Thinking (52), Frederick Buechner reminds us, 

“To eat any meal together is to meet at the level of our most basic need. It is hard to preserve your dignity with butter on your chin or to keep your distance when asking for tomato ketchup.”

[11] In a 1910 lecture at Yale, Charles E. Jefferson, pastor of Broadway United Church of Christ in New York City from 1892 to 1929, described the difference between a church and an audience. 

 

It is to be regretted that we have come to judge preachers by the number of persons who listen to their sermons. A superficial man is consequently tempted to work, not for a church, but for an audience.

An audience, however, is not worth working for. An audience is a group of unrelated people drawn together by a short-lived attraction. . . . It is a fortuitous concourse of human atoms, scattering as soon as a certain performance has ended. It is a pile of leaves to be blown away by the wind, a handful of sand lacking consistency and cohesion, a number of human filings drawn into position by a pulpit magnet, which will drop away as soon as the magnet is removed.

An audience is a crowd, a church is a family. An audience is a gathering, a church is a fellowship. An audience is a collection, a church is an organism. An audience is a heap of stones, a church is a temple. Preachers are ordained, not to attract an audience, but to build a church. Coarse and ambitious and worldly men, if richly gifted, can draw audiences. Only a disciple of the Lord can build a church.

If strong personalities don’t hold God’s people together, what does? To ask the question more narrowly, what holds the Christian churches and churches of Christ together?

No comments:

Post a Comment