Sunday, April 23, 2017

Acts 2:14, 22-32


Acts 2:14a, 22-32 (NRSV)

14 But Peter, standing with the eleven, raised his voice and addressed them,

22 “You that are Israelites, listen to what I have to say: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with deeds of power, wonders, and signs that God did through him among you, as you yourselves know— 23 this man, handed over to you according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of those outside the law. 24 But God raised him up, having freed him from death, because it was impossible for him to be held in its power. 25 For David says concerning him,

‘I saw the Lord always before me,
for he is at my right hand so that I will not be shaken;
26 therefore my heart was glad, and my tongue rejoiced;
moreover my flesh will live in hope.
27 For you will not abandon my soul to Hades,
or let your Holy One experience corruption.
28 You have made known to me the ways of life;
you will make me full of gladness with your presence.’

29 “Fellow Israelites, I may say to you confidently of our ancestor David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. 30 Since he was a prophet, he knew that God had sworn with an oath to him that he would put one of his descendants on his throne. 31 Foreseeing this, David spoke of the resurrection of the Messiah, saying,

‘He was not abandoned to Hades,
nor did his flesh experience corruption.’
32 This Jesus God raised up, and of that all of us are witnesses. 

Year A
Second Sunday of Easter
April 23, 2017
Cross~Wind
March 30, 2008
Crawfordsville First United Methodist Church
Title: Walking with Jesus: Need for a Creed


Introducing the Passage

Acts 2:14-36 has the theme of the message of Peter on Pentecost. Peter offers his first sermon. The Christology is very elementary. We may describe the speech as an early Christian defense of the gospel. The first aim of the Christian preacher was to show to his fellow citizens that Jesus was the promised Messiah of the Jewish faith. The Crucifixion seemed to have given the lie to the preaching of Jesus concerning the nearness of the rule of God. Until the early church could dispel this impression all preaching of the Christian message was futile. Hence, the defense of the gospel rather than its exposition is the need of the hour. Peter will develop the first creed. He will clearly state what he believes about Jesus and invite others to join him in the journey. The stress is not so much on the content of the gospel as on the evidence of its truth. The supreme argument for the messiahship was the Resurrection. It removed the impression left by a disgraceful death, proved that Jesus was no impostor, and vindicated all his claims. This explains the effort, so well illustrated in this speech, to see the scripture differently than they had before. They now saw certain passages as giving us a hint of the importance of resurrection for faith in the God of Israel. In this part of the sermon, Peter will see some new things in Psalm 16. Once the disciples saw this connection between their recent experience of the crucifixion and resurrection on the one hand a scripture on the other, they became the first to proclaim of what God had done in Jesus of Nazareth. To a Jewish audience no other argument would be necessary.  If the early church could show to a Jewish audience that scripture prophesied an event, they would have sufficient reason for believing in its truth and its divine significance. We believe because of the testimony or witness of these apostles.  

Introduction


Many preachers remember their first sermon.[1] Some people remember it as being particularly bad or cringe-worthy. My first sermon occurred when I was about 19. I was part of a team from my college that went out to share in different congregations. The first sermon was in front of a Native American congregation. I do not remember what I said. We were in South Dakota at Pine Ridge Reservation. I remember most that parents allowed children to run around the congregation. I had a warning that this might happen. I had no objection, but it was distracting. I was nervous, of course. Soon after that, I delivered a sermon at Austin, MN, at the congregation in which I had grown up. I do not remember the sermon, but it was such a privilege to be in that pulpit. In both cases, of course, I wanted to do well.

It is like that old story about a preacher who was leaving a congregation on his last Sunday. At the end of the service, he stood at the door while the people filed out and said their last goodbyes. One woman came to the preacher weeping, full of emotion. The preacher attempted to comfort her. "There, there, sister. Even though I'm leaving, I'm sure the bishop will send you a wonderful preacher." Through her tears she replied, "That's what they've been telling us for 20 years and it ain't happened yet!"

Will Willimon says that a first sermon in a congregation is a lot like a first date -- you want to do well, be impressive, put your best foot forward and not say anything dumb that might endanger the future relationship.

It can be a struggle, however, because we know our own struggles and weaknesses very well. We know that, at base, we are not any more qualified than anyone else to speak for God, regardless of that newly framed seminary degree. Therefore, we shake a little, wondering how we came to be standing there with the Word of God on our lips. In fact, the most important thing about every sermon is that the focus is the Word of God and its application to our lives today. We need to trust that the Word of God still speaks, even after this many centuries. Today, I think, we need to preach naturally, rather than with a preachy voice. We need to keep it relatively short.[2] 

Application


            The first sermon of Peter focuses upon the power of the Word of God to interpret their experience of Jesus of Nazareth, especially in his crucifixion and resurrection.

I know it might surprise some of you, but Easter is a particularly difficult time for preachers.

Here we are, the Sunday after Easter. If anything defines Christianity, it is here. God raised Jesus from the dead. This means you can walk with him, learn from him, and be his disciple. As many have done, so can you.

Are you a disciple?

In one sense, being a disciple is simple and easy. Believe in Jesus and go to heaven. Yet, that leaves a lot of time in between. What happens in between is not so easy or simple, for we keep learning what it means to be a disciple, to be a student of Jesus, to walk with him throughout our lives.[3] 

Many young people today want the church to be honest with them. What do you believe? What defines you as a Christian community? In fact, many persons today want to connect with something larger than what they could create. They want to be part of something huge. The creeds remind us that we are part of a global Christian community that has existed for almost 2000 years. We live into the creed, and as we do so, we let it define us.

            One pastor put it this way:  

What I felt was something akin to wonder. When the people stood to say ‘I believe in God, the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth ...,’ I had a sense of being caught up in something beyond my tiny self. Saying that affirmation of faith, Sunday after Sunday, regardless of the archaic language or my particular mood of the day, has shaped my faith ever since and grounded it in a living tradition.” 

            The word “creed” is Latin, credo, I believe. Many religions do not have them. Some Christian denominations do not have them. Some people think of them as getting in the way.

            In his book, Creed: What Christians Believe and Why it Matters, Luke Timothy Johnson points out that the root of forming creeds is Judaism found in Deuteronomy 6:4: (“Hear O Israel, the LORD our God is one LORD. And you shall love the LORD your God with all your heart and all your soul and all your might.”) We know this affirmation as the Shema in Judaism. It means “Hear.” What is important about this statement is that it describes a common belief about God and a personal response, so the creed here is both communal (our God) and personal (love the Lord, your God).

            Though Christian confessional statements bear a remarkable resemblance to the original Shema, there is one obvious alteration. The earliest Christians altered their story of God’s way in the world in light of their personal experience of the resurrection of Jesus Christ. The Christian creed focuses on Jesus. What we believe about him causes us to follow him, to learn from him, to be his disciples.

            Peter proclaimed a common belief that Jesus was crucified, died and was buried and that God raised him from the dead, because that was the conviction that had captured his heart.

            Creeds are important not just because they articulate our personal experience of the risen Christ, but they also serve to unite the church. When so much else divides the global church and the local church, the story held in common by all Christians and expressed in the creed, brings us together. Christians can and do disagree on any number of issues that are rocking the world, but still maintain unity through a common confession of faith.

            The creeds also protect believers from the tendency toward radical individualism or simply inventing our own faith.

            Nothing we created would contain God. The creed does not contain God. Yet, they do point the way. Experienced in this way, creeds, like stories, open up a new world of faithful exploration. Once we accept the truthfulness of what they are expressing, that can shape our lives in the way Rich Mullins described so personally. 

“And I believe that what I believe
Is what makes me what I am
I did not make it, no it is making me
It is the very truth of God and not
the invention of any man.”
- Rich Mullins 

            Finally, William Sloane Coffin, in what was his last book, Credo, says that a creed is that “to which I give my heart.” The task for us all is to take the creed — words on paper — and allow those words to become a living, breathing reality in our experience. Our faith, embodied by the creeds, is a way to say “I love you,” according to Pelikan. Coffin says it is something we must give our hearts to, our lives to.

            Peter certainly did. Standing among a crowd of questioning people, some cynical, some merely skeptical and many truly seeking, Peter laid out the best formulation of what we cannot comprehend. He did not rely upon his own ability to devise an interpretation that would convince the crowd. Instead, he offered a truth held in common, a story that captured his heart and mind. 

Conclusion


            So what is it that we are giving our hearts to? Career? Pride? Unhealthy habits? Leisure toys? Consumerism? Vanity? Greed? Whatever it is, that is our creed.

            Is it serving others, increasing the supply of human kindness and happiness? Serving God? Giving our time selflessly to family, friends and community? Whatever it is, that is our creed.

            Peter’s story is an account that describes not so much what we can comprehend but the God who comprehends us and provides for our salvation — and that is something we can love, give our hearts to, and allow it to shape us.

Going deeper 


These early accounts Luke offers of the church in Jerusalem show that early Christians lived quiet lives of faith in Jerusalem. We learn that Joel 2:32 and Psalm 110 were early biblical texts that helped the early community understand who Jesus was. We detect little trace of Pauline ideas that must have been current in the environment in which Luke wrote. For example, any reference to faith as a necessary condition of sharing in the blessings of the messianic age is noticeably absent. Only once in these early speeches does Peter mention it: in 3:16, where it states that this faith is the reason for the healing of the lame man—a close resemblance to the view of faith characteristic of the Synoptic Gospels. To judge by these early sermons the first preachers contented themselves with the demonstration of the messiahship, and did not ask what the messiahship involved for Jesus himself. There is no reason to suppose that at first their idea of messiahship differed greatly from that of their fellow Jews. It was only when the original messianic expectations had somewhat waned that Christians began to fill in or add to the picture with its original Jewish content, probably by drawing on their recollection of Jesus' own words, the full meaning of which they had at the time missed. Only when it dawned upon them that Jesus' work was something more than the founding of a national messianic kingdom did they begin to speculate upon the person of Jesus himself. This explains the complete absence here of any developed Christology.  

14 But Peter, standing with the eleven, raised his voice and addressed them,

[Peter is speaking as a leader of the church in Jerusalem.]

22 “You [Peter explains directly that the responsibility for Jesus' rejection, condemnation and crucifixion rests upon their shoulders.  If any group needed to be saved, it was surely this community. Peter both proclaims Jesus as the Messiah and calls those who condemn him to repentance--while offering them the outstretched hand of God's forgiveness and salvation. As the rest of Peter's first speech makes clear, of all people, the Jerusalem Jews should be stunned and ecstatic at this show of divine mercy.] that are Israelites,[ showing his own people rejected Jesus, a notion in I Peter 2:4, 7.] listen to what I have to say: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with deeds of power, wonders, and signs that God did through him among you, as you yourselves know— 23 this man, handed over to you according to the definite plan and foreknowledge (prognwsij occurring only here and I Peter 1:2) of God, [th| w`rismenh| boulh| kai prognwsh| tou qeou, is in the instrumental case. Note both purpose (boulh) and foreknowledge (prognwsij) of God and "determined" (w`rismenh, perfect passive participle, state of completion). God had willed the death of Jesus (John 3:16) and the death of Judas (Ac 1:16), but that fact did not absolve Judas from his responsibility and guilt (Lu 22:22). He acted as a free moral agent.[4]]  you crucified and killed by the hands of those outside the law. [that is, the Romans.]24 But God raised him up, having freed him from death, because it was impossible for him to be held in its power. 25 For David [Psalm 16] says concerning him,

‘I saw the Lord always before me,
for he is at my right hand so that I will not be shaken;
26 therefore my heart was glad, and my tongue rejoiced;
moreover my flesh will live in hope.
27 For you will not abandon my soul to Hades,
or let your Holy One experience corruption.
28 You have made known to me the ways of life;
you will make me full of gladness with your presence.’

[Peter will claim that the Psalm foretells the resurrection of the Messiah.]

29 “Fellow Israelites, I may say to you confidently of our ancestor David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. 30 Since he was a prophet, he knew that God had sworn with an oath to him that he would put one of his descendants on his throne. 31 Foreseeing this, David spoke of the resurrection of the Messiah, saying,

‘He was not abandoned to Hades,
nor did his flesh experience corruption.’

32 This Jesus God raised up, and of that all of us are witnesses.

[We can see here that the cross is still an obstacle to faith, to be overcome by stressing the resurrection.  The conception of a suffering Messiah was completely strange to contemporary Judaism, and there is little sign that the disciples saw at first in Jesus' death, as did Jesus himself, any positive contribution to the advancement of the kingdom of God. It may have taken some time before early Christians, even before Paul, started to see the truth of what Paul says in I Corinthians 15:3, where he says that he “received” the teaching that "Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures."]

[Pannenberg points to the significance of the resurrection of Jesus, one of which is that if God raised Jesus, this for a Jew can only mean that God has confirmed the pre-Easter activity of Jesus. He also finds reasons for maintaining the unity of Jesus with God. One reason is that decisive for confidence in the facticity of the resurrection of Jesus as the Christian message proclaims it are the primitive Christian testimonies to the appearances of the risen Lord to the disciples, along with the discovery of the empty tomb of Jesus in Jerusalem. His point is that we as modern people cannot accept such testimony blindly based on authority. Rather, we might do so only after whether the testimony holds it up by testing other reported facts. In this context, he considers that the oldest New Testament witness to the resurrection and ascension of Jesus form a single event, which he sees as the point here in verses 30-32. For him, this suggests that the account of the appearance of the risen Lord “from heaven” to Paul in Galatians 1:6 is an indication of what is behind the Gospel stories of the appearances as well.[5]]



[1] Perhaps it is like a doctor performing her first hernia operation – it is not pretty, and it is probably a bloody mess, but she gets it all stitched up and the patient is good as new, better than ever. Maybe preaching that first sermon is like a pilot going solo for the first time or a lawyer giving his first summation to the jury.
[3] Many of the books Kayc is having us read around the theme of the discipleship pathway stress the importance of practical teaching of Bible, developing a view of the world rooted in the Bible, and developing core beliefs that help shape people into disciples. The reason is that such beliefs will shape your life.
 
[4]                      Robertson’s Word Pictures.
[5] Systematic Theology, Volume I, 352-55; Volume II, 354, Jesus: God and Man, 67-68, 92.

No comments:

Post a Comment