Now all the
tax collectors and sinners were coming near to listen to him. 2 And
the Pharisees and the scribes were grumbling and saying, “This fellow welcomes
sinners and eats with them.”
3 So he told them this parable:
11 “There was a
man who had two sons. 12 The younger of them said to his father,
‘Father, give me the share of the property that will belong to me.’ So he
divided his property between them. 13 A few days later the younger
son gathered all he had and traveled to a distant country, and there he
squandered his property in dissolute living. 14 When he had spent
everything, a severe famine took place throughout that country, and he began to
be in need. 15 So he went and hired himself out to one of the
citizens of that country, who sent him to his fields to feed the pigs. 16 He
would gladly have filled himself with the pods that the pigs were eating; and
no one gave him anything. 17 But when he came to himself he said,
‘How many of my father’s hired hands have bread enough and to spare, but here I
am dying of hunger! 18 I will get up and go to my father, and I will
say to him, “Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you; 19 I
am no longer worthy to be called your son; treat me like one of your hired
hands.” ’ 20 So he set off and went to his father. But while he was
still far off, his father saw him and was filled with compassion; he ran and
put his arms around him and kissed him. 21 Then the son said to him,
‘Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you; I am no longer worthy to
be called your son.’ 22 But the father said to his slaves, ‘Quickly,
bring out a robe—the best one—and put it on him; put a ring on his finger and
sandals on his feet. 23 And get the fatted calf and kill it, and let
us eat and celebrate; 24 for this son of mine was dead and is alive
again; he was lost and is found!’ And they began to celebrate.
25 “Now his elder son was in the field; and when
he came and approached the house, he heard music and dancing. 26 He
called one of the slaves and asked what was going on. 27 He replied,
‘Your brother has come, and your father has killed the fatted calf, because he
has got him back safe and sound.’ 28 Then he became angry and
refused to go in. His father came out and began to plead with him. 29 But
he answered his father, ‘Listen! For all these years I have been working like a
slave for you, and I have never disobeyed your command; yet you have never
given me even a young goat so that I might celebrate with my friends. 30 But
when this son of yours came back, who has devoured your property with
prostitutes, you killed the fatted calf for him!’ 31 Then the father
said to him, ‘Son, you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours. 32
But we had to celebrate and rejoice, because this brother of yours was
dead and has come to life; he was lost and has been found.’ ”
Year C
Fourth Sunday in Lent
March 6, 2016
Cross~Wind
Title: God the Recycler
Introduction
I came across an article that
involves a certain woman, Bilikiss (pronounced BILLY-KEESS) Adebiyi-Abiola.[1]
Her story inspires me. It does not
inspire me because of her recycling business. Although I recycle when
available, I do not make a big deal of this. Her commitment and passion are
inspiring. However, what inspires me most today is how she could look at
something that most of us ignore and saw a business opportunity. I see an
important spiritual lesson here as well. Bishop Michael Coyner in Indiana has
had a focus on “making a difference” in the lives of people. This woman has
done that, and the phrase will show up a few times in articles about her. Here
is part of her story.
Her home was Lagos, Nigeria. She left
family and friends to receive a Masters of Business Administration from MIT. Although
one can imagine the possibilities for her in America, including starting a
business and a high salary, this was not her dream. After spending 13 years in
the United States, part of it with IBM, she was still far from home. Yet,
Bilikiss had a moment when she “came to herself.” She realized that “waste” or
garbage fascinated her. She had seen people in the United States sort their
trash into recycling bins, and learned how this simple act helps preserve the
environment. Then, this young woman remembered her home where trash is a
problem. "People in the U.S. are very careful about taking care of waste.
I thought, Why not Nigeria?" she said.
Lagos, like many large cities, has
its problems. Since 2004, Nigeria has seen a 5% increase in the number of
people living below $1 per day, despite recently overtaking South Africa as the
continent’s largest economy. Of Lagos’s 18 million residents, 60% live in slum
neighborhoods that operate as informal, thriving cities of their own. No one
collects about 60% of the trash. It sits in piles and sometimes in the street. The
trash is not just a nuisance, but also a health hazard, providing breeding
grounds for flies and rodents. [Having been to a different poor country, Haiti,
I have seen children using the rash on the streets for toys.]
Her new way of seeing trash
awakened her to new possibilities. She was not going to use her degree to start
just any business. She would return home and focus on trash. She named her new
company Wecyclers. She was eager to make a difference for her people. It was
not easy. She had little response when she talked about the environment. After all,
she was asking people to consider seriously something as trivial as trash. Then,
she showed them what paying attention to trash could mean to them.[2]
[A good lesson here, but I do not want to sidetrack myself.] She convinced them
that money was lying on the street by paying them for it.
She has received many awards and
recognitions since her business started in 2012. She was a “lioness of Africa.”[3]
Not only would recycling help the
city with their trash problem, and cut down on the spread of disease, it would
generate cash -- money that could help people improve their lives in other
ways.[4]
The young woman who traveled far
from home is changing the way the people of Lagos look at their garbage. What
was once trash is now a treasure.
Sermon approach
Thankfully, the end of the story of
the young man in the story Jesus told has a parallel in this story of Bilikiss.
The father sees value where others do not. The father invites people to have
joy in the recycling or redeeming of this young man. Of course, the story Jesus
told is really about God. In sending Jesus, we learn that what people consider
as lost, worthless, and waste, is valuable, reconcilable, and redeemable.
Application
First, let us consider God as the
one who recycles a human life.
When the boy is still far from
home, his dad spies him off in the distance. Setting aside his status as a
patriarch and landowner, the father hikes up his robes, and sprints out to
greet his son. [I can imagine Jesus using some humor and acting this out.] When
the young man begins the speech he had planned for this moment, his dad is not
listening. Dad does not want to hear
about his son's mistakes. He does not need the young man to debase himself.
Instead, the father is overjoyed. The true treasure he had lost when his son left
home has returned to him. Calling for robes, rings and fatted calves, the
father demonstrates that he sees in his son treasure, not trash. The love of
the father transforms the son.
Many of us can put ourselves in the
young man's place. We, too, have a voice inside of us that only wants to dwell
on the garbage in our lives. We have made mistakes, and we hear repeatedly
that, like a discarded bottle or can, whatever was of value inside of us we
have already poured out. Nothing valuable remains.
Thankfully, God is a great recycler.
[The more common word we use here is redeemer]. A recycler or redeemer does not
just see trash. God has made each of us in the image of God. God is not about
to cast us aside and put us in a landfill.
God sees the value in us even when
we are far away. God has not abandoned us. God has not tossed us aside. God
loves us and knows our worth. When we turn toward God, God sprints toward us,
embraces us and welcomes us home.
Second, God calls the church to recycle.
Unfortunately, you may have people
in your life who will continue to reinforce the old message. Sadly, the church too
often becomes a partner in that.
Famously, the older brother is
going to remind dad and his brother of past sins. He will remind them the boy
is trash. We have our terms as well, such as white trash or trailer trash. We have
elevated “trash talk.” Of course, dad, also famously, does not listen, pointing
to the value of the son. Dad treasures both sons and invites the older son to
the party.
Jesus tells this story in order to
remind the religious folks that God is all about redeeming sinners. Jesus
illustrates the kind of love God has for the lost by the way Jesus lived in
welcoming the sinner. In fact, those who are going through the process of
recycling – the work is never done – have the mission of inviting others to
allow God to recycle (redeem) them. Sadly, religious people have a temptation
to label others in a way that suggests dismissal. In those days, labels like
sinner, tax collector, Samaritan, adulterer, Gentile, and leper worked quite
well. It also meant that they as religious people had no responsibility for
them. They could keep a safe distance.
Of course, we do not engage in such
unwelcoming labeling. … However, it seems like I recall some who stand on the
side of the road with placards pointing out the sins of others. Establishment,
elite, status quo, have/have not, the one-percent, progressive/conservative are
just a few. We label and dismiss, whether in real life or social media. How
long has it been since you had lunch with someone on the polar end of your own
political or religious point of view? We seem fearful we might learn something!
We cast them out, discard them, and consider them so much trash.
Conclusion
When we read the gospels, we find Jesus on the
fringes where he meets those whom we might have tossed aside. There, Jesus
heals lepers, forgives tax collectors, eats with sinners and welcomes a woman
with a questionable reputation who came to a well in the middle of the day.
There, Jesus loved a rich young man who lost himself in his possessions. Jesus
loved the hardworking laborer of his day, the one who gained his livelihood by
fishing. Jesus even loved the political activist who thought the system needed
changing through violence. Be careful whom you might label and dismiss. Jesus
might be there.
Jesus is the great Recycler
(Redeemer), reclaiming the treasure we often miss.
He invites us to join him in this
work.
God's way, as shown us in Jesus, is
a tremendous recycling program, welcoming younger siblings back home and
inviting us all to the party!
The older son missed the party. He
refused to see the treasure in his younger brother, choosing instead to focus
on the trash.
Are you coming to the joyful party?
We have some recycling to do.
Going deeper
Luke 15:11-32 is the parable of the
prodigal son. The source is the material unique to Luke. In context, there is
the additional emphasis on God's joy at
finding what was lost. Jesus, the kingdom preacher, expresses the
divine willingness to accept the repentant sinner into the kingdom. Jesus is the herald of a loving Father who
shows mercy to the repentant sinner. Pannenberg will say that the heart of the
message of Jesus was announcing the nearness of the divine reign, but Jesus
called this God the heavenly Father. In Jesus, God shows himself to be the
Father who is ready to forgive those who turn to him.[5] He thinks that Jesus
regarded the loving and saving address of God to us, and particularly to the
needy and the lost among us, as the purpose of his sending. He believed that by
his sending, the Father was addressing the lost. In this parable, Jesus is defending
addressing his message and work to the lost. The parable portrays God as the
one who seeks what is lost and who in so doing displays the self-attesting love
of the Father. The search reveals the divine love that takes place through the
work and message of Jesus.[6]
Luke 15:1-3 (NRSV)
Now all the tax collectors and sinners were
coming near to listen to him. 2 And the Pharisees and the scribes
were grumbling and saying, “This fellow welcomes sinners and eats with them.”
[As Luke sets the scene for this parable, Jesus may purposely test the boiling
point of the increasingly disturbed scribes and Pharisees who were keeping a
close eye on Jesus' growing popularity. Just as the Pharisees had grumped about
Jesus in v. 2, this father "welcomes sinners and eats with them."
Immediately preceding this, Luke relates two other parables of
"lostness." In 15:4-7, the parable of the "lost sheep," and
in 15:8-10, the parable of the "lost coin" introduce themes also
found in verses 11-32. The overarching
message speaks of the joy that is felt when one lost sheep, one lost coin or
one lost son is found again and welcomed back into its fold, purse or family.
All three of these parables serve as Jesus' response to the nasty grumbling of
the Pharisees and scribes described in 15:1-2. Jesus' attitudes and actions
toward "tax collectors and sinners" are the problem. He not only
welcomes them to his congregation; he also welcomes them to his table. The straight-laced righteousness of the
Pharisees and scribes found Jesus' behavior quite suspicious, even scandalous.
They could never condone social contact with such "sinners." In
the face of this stern self-righteousness, the prodigal son parable offers
pointed commentary through the unhesitating, exuberant joy exhibited by the father
and the wrong-headed, hardhearted attitude of the elder brother.
3 So he told them this parable:
The body of
this lengthy parable contains numerous fascinating nuances that testify to
Luke's storytelling prowess and finesse. A brief overview can catch only a few
of the author's juicy tidbits. Note how Luke uses Hellenistic images and
information to add realism to the story. Jesus sets the stage by observing that
a man had two sons. In verse 13, not many days later, he "gathered all he
had" --
11 “There was a man who had two sons. 12 The
younger of them said to his father, ‘Father, give me the share of the property
that will belong to me.’ [Luke uses Greek legal language to describe
the younger son's demand to his father that he "give me the share of the
property that will belong to me" (v.12). Although it was not unusual for
a father to distribute property in advance, as in the case of marriage, Jesus
strongly implies that the younger son’s demand is disrespectful, rebellious and
foolish — a clear violation of the commandment to honor one’s parents (Exodus
20:12). In a culture where family and community always took priority over the
individual, the kid’s self-centered demand would have raised the eyebrows of
those hearing the parable for the first time. Yet despite the legalese
(or perhaps because of it), scholars still wrangle over what exactly was due to
a son who would make such a demand. In
addition, we wonder what legal and moral responsibilities would remain between
this father and son once this division of property occurred. Whatever the cultural standards or legal
implications associated with early inheritance, the younger son cast them
aside.] So he divided his property between them. 13 A few days later
the younger son gathered all he had [that is, he converted
his inheritance to cash -- and
traveled to a distant country, [and left home, family and any obligations
far behind.] and there he squandered his property in dissolute living. [The fall of the son is rapid, complete, and
catastrophic. "Asotos" can be "extravagantly" or
"recklessly." The boy's fortunes deteriorate.] 14 When
he had spent everything, a severe famine took place throughout that country,
and he began to be in need. 15 So he went and hired himself out to
one of the citizens of that country, who sent him to his fields to feed the
pigs. 16 He would gladly have filled himself with the pods that the
pigs were eating; and no one gave him anything. [This son has
spirit. He moves on to get a job, even
as a temporary hireling, working not for wages, but only for the food he
needs. Note that only the extreme
desperateness of his situation that finally brings this son to consider
returning home. Luke's language in verse 14-16 is coarse and colloquial when he
describes how the son would have loved to eat the disgusting food he was giving
to the pigs. (Some scholars profess to be able to see signs of a hasty scribal
attempt to clean it up). Working for a Gentile and playing servant
to swine was the bottom of all possible Jewish barrels.] 17
But when he came to himself he said, ‘How many of my father’s hired hands
have bread enough and to spare, but here I am dying of hunger! [Luke's phrasing of how the young man
"came to himself" is one of the few Semiticisms in this parable. It
literally means, "to repent."] 18 I will get up and go to my
father, and I will say to him, “Father, I have sinned against heaven and before
you; 19 I am no longer worthy to be called your son; treat me like
one of your hired hands.” ’ [While
the son's "confession" sounds contrite and genuine enough, a careful examination of the thought
process that led him to this confession reveals only one clear motivating
force: hunger. The son decides to
return home and throw himself on his father's mercy only because he feels he is
starving to death.] 20 So
he set off and went to his father. But while he was still far off, his father
saw him and was filled with compassion; he ran and put his arms around him and
kissed him. [The
father's impetuous forgiveness of the approaching son may appear to offer the
boy forgiveness without repentance. Nevertheless, the son had already privately
voiced his change of heart and mind. The
father's welcome and forgiveness (the embrace and the kiss) occur before the
son's confession.] 21 Then the son said to him,
‘Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you; I am no longer worthy to
be called your son.’ [The
son admits his sin against heaven and against the father. He does not deserve
to be called son. Even more telling is the fact that the earlier Masoretic text
has the father cut the son's "confession" off midway, as he excitedly
calls his servants to tend to the young man.]
22 But the father said to his slaves, ‘Quickly,
bring out a robe—the best one—and put it on him; put a ring on his finger and
sandals on his feet. [The robe, ring and sandals the father has
the boy decked out in are all marks of the son's fully restored place of honor
and authority in the household.] 23 And get the fatted calf [symbolizing a truly special and festive
occasion] and kill it, and let us eat and celebrate; 24 for this son of mine was dead
and is alive again; he was lost and is found!’ And they began to celebrate.
[The father's reaction is so
overwhelmingly joyous, so unexpectedly elated, that the reader is rightly
stunned. Pannenberg also points out that in verses 20-24, the emphasis of Paul on the goodness,
grace, and favor of God shown in the Son continues theme of the preaching of
Jesus that by his message and in his work, the Father shows us the mercy that
pardons our sins.[7] He stresses that the meals Jesus held or shared
characterized his coming and the conduct of his disciples, and that when he
accepted invitations from others he made known his readiness to grant
fellowship with him to those who issued the invitation. The granting of
acceptance of table fellowship by Jesus removed everything that separated
people from God and his salvation. It meant the forgiveness of sins, so that
table fellowship was a real symbol of fellowship with God and of participation
in the future of the divine kingdom. The re-acceptance of the prodigal came to
expression in the feast that the father prepared for him.[8] He stresses that preaching of
the imminence of the rule of God opens up participation in eschatological
salvation. In this fact, Jesus sees a
demonstration of the love of God that seeks the lost, in keeping with the
goodness of the Creator. The goodness of the Creator becomes saving love in the
sending of Jesus to announce imminent divine rule, which we see in this
parable at the saving of the lost. Forgiving
love that has reached its goal finds expression in this joy.[9]
Jesus had a reputation of making friends
with “sinners.” The reception that the son receives seems typical of Jesus, in
that he commends throwing a party. The story represents the reconciliation of
Judean with Judean. The central figure is the Father. Originally, Jesus may have intended a story
of God's welcoming back a repentant person, not allowing the
"faithful" elder brother to hinder that love.
However, no one had even gone to fetch this older son from the fields
where he was working so that he might join in the festivities. The elder son is not yet a part of this
celebration. In fact, apparently, he does not even learn of it or of his
brother's return until after he has finished his day's work in the fields. 25 “Now his elder son was in the
field; and when he came and approached the house, he heard music and dancing. 26
He called one of the slaves and asked what was going on. 27 He
replied, ‘Your brother has come, and your father has killed the fatted calf,
because he has got him back safe and sound.’ 28 Then he became angry
and refused to go in. His father came out and began to plead with him. [The
invitation extended to the elder brother is important, for it offers the
message of Jesus to the Jewish people. The anger of the elder son is instant.
This son is so enraged that he will not even step foot in the house. Yet, we learn much about the father. The
father’s love had driven him out of his house and down the road to welcome home
his younger son. Now, the love the
father feels for his older son again pulls him out the door and into the fields
to be with him in his anger.] 29
But he answered his father, ‘Listen! For all these years I have been
working like a slave for you, and I have never disobeyed your command; yet you
have never given me even a young goat so that I might celebrate with my
friends. 30 But when this son of yours came back, who has devoured
your property with prostitutes, you killed the fatted calf for him!’ [The
confrontational tone he takes with his father is neither respectful nor
obedient. He even refuses to acknowledge his blood relationship to his brother,
identifying him only as "this son of yours." The older son pours
forth what we might call his "righteous indignation."]
31 Then the father said to him, ‘Son, you are
always with me, and all that is mine is yours. 32 But we had to
celebrate and rejoice, because this brother of yours was dead and has come to
life; he was lost and has been found.’ ” [The father refuses to be shocked.
His eyes and heart remain firmly fixed on what he sees as the only
important fact about this missing younger son - he is found, and he is alive.]
The story ends here, leaving a host of
unanswered questions for the reader.
What is most shocking about this parable is how it seems to celebrate
grace, even at the expense of justice. Like all good parables, we cannot
contain the prodigal son story by just one explanation. The narrative takes its
meaning and strength from the fact that it is a parable, a story, and as such
invites others to participate in it. Fittingly, Luke's story closes with a
typical parabolic ending -- which is to say "no ending." We leave the confrontation scene between
father and son before hearing the son's response. It is the reader, therefore,
who must provide the final reply to the father's invitation to rejoice and join
the party.
We should
resist investing this parable with wholly allegorical interpretations, however.
For
example, some scholarship has sought to describe the elder brother as Luke's
allegorical representative of Pharisaic Judaism. The testimonies by the father
to his eldest indicate that the son is not simply a "stand-in" for
Pharisaic Judaism. Consider verse 31
where the father promises he is "always with" him and that "all
that is mine is yours." Nothing here is said about the son's personal need
for a repentant attitude -- surely a requirement if he were simply an
allegorical Pharisee. Further, the father challenges the older son, not about
his self-righteousness, but about his lack of joy. The father's concern is the
radical notion of joyous acceptance of the one who was "dead," who
was "lost." The need for critical, holier-than-thou attitudes is not
an explicit focus of Luke's text.
The roots
of our term "prodigal" come from the Latin "prodigere" --
meaning to "drive forth or away" or to "waste." We can
interpret it as either extravagant wastefulness or liberal generosity. While
Luke himself does not call the younger son a "prodigal," the term
certainly suits the actions this young man took when he "squandered his
property." .
The prodigal son is a narrative
enactment of the relentless, resourceful way God seeks us and keeps us. One strand of modernity believes that we are
most fully ourselves when we are most detached from any values other than those
we have personally chosen. Some forms of
psychology, existentialism, and romanticism suggest as much. Human society is
the blockage individuals face in gaining personal fulfillment. This story of the wayward son who comes home
to a party suggests morality begins when we come home. "Your brother is home,"
or "Son, all that I have is yours."
[1] You can hear her on Youtube talk about her
business. The
Huffington Post (November 2014) has an interesting article and interview
with her. The
Guardian (October 2015) has a very good article as well. She received the
honor of being a “lioness
of Africa,” that is, one of the great female entrepreneurs of Africa.
[2] She showed them the value of what they threw away. Lagos
generates approximately 735,000 tons of plastic each year, worth about $300
million to waste brokers who resell it to recyclers and others.
[3] As the editor of the magazine put it, “We love the
fact that one woman entrepreneur had an incredible vision to positively change
lives and make a difference in her country, and as a result, is working to
successfully change the environmental behavior of a country’s population, one
piece of plastic at a time.”
[4] They visit some 6,000 homes each week exchanging cash
and household goods for recyclables, collecting 40 tons each month.
[5]
Systematic Theology, Volume I, 259.
[6]
Systematic Theology, Volume I,
422-23.
[7]
Systematic Theology, Volume I, 433.
[8]
Systematic Theology, Volume III, 285.
[9]
Systematic Theology, Volume II, 331.
Facebook friend posted this: Great sermon today! I'm not sure if X shared with you what we are doing today, but your sermon went right along with it. God is working!
ReplyDeleteIn a telephone conversation, one member thought I should emphasize better that the young son repented. She had the experience of a daughter, after leaving them for several years, came home without saying she was sorry for what she had done. This does raise an important question, I think. In the context of the parable, there would be no reconciliation if the young son did not repent. Yet, the father is watching for him and sees him at a distance, and is ready to embrace, suggesting that his love remained for the son. Sometimes, love must let go, as this father did, and let the child experience life without the guidance of home. Life experience will lead one to "come to" oneself, or repent, but how long will it take?
ReplyDelete