Showing posts with label Wisdom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wisdom. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 13, 2024

Year B Psalm and OT Proverbs for Common Time

Proverbs

Psalm 125 (Year B September 4-10) is a communal lament. It exalts those who trust in the Lord. The psalm has a warning to maintain trust in God and establish it afresh wherever it is on the decline or in danger. The threat is to the whole community. It focuses upon the safety and security of the people of the Lord. Pilgrims particularly loved this song as they came upon the city. Those who trust in the Lord are as stable is Mount Zion, which nothing can move abides forever. Such persons are firmly rooted in the promises of God. The Lord surrounds such persons like the mountains surround Jerusalem, and will do so forever, providing an image of security. The poet then shifts to the concern about the scepter of wickedness that is present in the land, asserting that it will not remain long in the land, so that the righteousness will not do wrong by cooperating with that scepter. The poet then shifts to the petition that the Lord do good those who are good and upright in their hearts, noting that those who turn aside to their won crooked ways the Lord will lead away with evildoers to their destruction. The Lord will abandon those who abandon the Lord. The poet concludes with a prayer for salvation, praying peace upon Israel. 

This psalm connects with the Old Testament lesson in its reference to those who are good and upright, as they proverbs refer to the importance of a good name.

Proverbs 22:1-2, 8-9, 22-23 (Year B September 4-10) have proverbs that concern the wisdom and folly of compassion and greed. They are short, witty, memorable, and true if we have the wisdom to apply them to the proper situation. Look before you leap, applied properly, refers to the caution one needs before making a major change in one’s life. However, a rolling stone gathers no moss applies to a situation in which one needs to keep moving forward or run the risk of becoming stagnant. Wisdom literature condensed in such short sayings depends upon common human experience. They are part of the secular reflections in the Old Testament, but even then, occur within the background of the particularity of the religion of Israel.

Ellen T. Charry, Princeton theologian wrote God and the Art of Happiness (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 2010). In this study, she addresses her concern that Christian theology lacks a substantial doctrine of human flourishing. In the book’s first section, Charry surveys the history of philosophy and Christian doctrine to reveal overlooked thinkers from Augustine to the Anglican divine Joseph Butler who encourage human flourishing. In the second section, Charry examines the biblical foundations of a doctrine she calls “asherism” (from the Hebrew asher, to be happy) and finds that Scripture encourages Christians to organize life around God so that the love, beauty, goodness, and wisdom of God may lift them up.  This discussion is what makes the book memorable for theologians, and boring for others. It has an innovative teaching of ‘asherism.’ Asherism avoids the dangers of self-denying agapism (love that would let people walk all over you) and self-serving eudemonism (your personal pleasure is your goal) by confirming our perennial need to love God, neighbor, and self at once and to live out our lives and vocations by the letter, spirit, and telos of both the law and the gospel.” Happiness, she concludes, is celebrating our own spiritual growth and well-being, and the enjoyment God receives in them.  She makes it clear that Christians need not be dour and gloomy about life, but that their traditions do encourage them to put on a happy face.

As she sees it, western Christian theology is skittish about happiness. We hope for future, eternal happiness, but we avoid considering happiness in this life as if we suspect that God would not allow such a thing. The book offers a refreshing interpretation of happiness as a way of life grounded in scripture and the incarnate Christ.

Ellen Charry here reveals how the Bible encourages the happiness and joy that accompany obedience to the Creator, enhancing both our own life and the lives of those around us. This advances the wellbeing of creation, which, in turn, causes God to delight with, in, and for us.

Charry says that the divine goal of Christian truth is to produce virtue, and, thus, theology ought to be more concerned with teaching wisdom – the root of happiness – than knowledge. She believes that knowledge is a necessary, but subordinate, means to character formation. The same should be true about our study of Scripture. Yes, it helps us know what is in the Bible, but the larger purpose of our study is to help us become the person God calls us to be. 

If our reading of the Old Testament brings us face to face with the asherist commands, our reading of the New Testament brings us, among other things, the Sermon on the Mount. That, too, aims at teaching wisdom and helping us create communities that thrive.

Not all Old Testament commands are asherist. Some, says Charry, are “single occurrence or rarely occurring ... orders” related to a specific time or circumstance, to test obedience.” For example, when God told Adam and Eve not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, it was an obedience test. The asherist commands, however, are guidelines that commend an ongoing way of life. They include the Ten Commandments, certainly, but also the laws about how to treat the poor and the resident alien, and how to use the land. The asherist commands teach us the values God holds for human interactions and life together.

Verses 1-2, 8-9 are from a collection of miscellaneous wisdom sayings.

A good name is to be chosen rather than great riches, and favor is better than silver or gold (22:1). The admonition regarding securing and preserving a good reputation is throughout Proverbs and other wisdom literature. Pause, and think about that. Riches are not bad. Yet, what priority do you have in life? Surely, we need to build character. Temptation gives us knowledge of ourselves. It comes at differing times and circumstances, testing the various sides of who we are. Integrity on one side of our character is no voucher for integrity on another side of our character. We have experienced a certain set of temptations. We do not know how we will act with another set of temptations different from the ones experienced thus far. This thought should keep us humble. We are sinners. However, we do not yet know how great a sinner we are.[1] One who focuses upon that will take everything that matters with him or her into eternity.  “Reputation is an idle and most false imposition; oft got without merit and lost without deserving” (Shakespeare). “It takes many good deeds to build a good reputation, and only one bad one to lose it” (Benjamin Franklin). “Your reputation is what other people think you are; your character is what you really are” (John Wooden). “You can’t build a reputation on what you are going to do” (Henry Ford). Why is a reputation more valuable than money? Some people do not care what others think of them. Don’t we secretly admire those people? The text says a good reputation is to be valued above riches. But if you have riches, why does it matter what people think of you? What are the benefits of a good reputation, and what makes a reputation a good one?

2 The rich and the poor have this in common: the Lord is the maker of them all.

Wise social interactions include contrasting the oppression of the poor in opposition to the practice of generosity. The Lord tears down the house of the proud but maintains the boundaries of the widow from encroachment (15:25 C), an act forbidden in the laws of Israel, recognizing that since only adult males had direct access to the courts the widow had a precarious legal status. The rich and the poor, when they meet, have an obvious difference between them, but, as in 20:12, they have this in common: the Lord is the maker of them all (22:2 C), a fact both need to keep in mind.  The Lord made the distinction between man and woman in creation, a distinction that matters for many reasons. Yet, most of the other distinctions that we consider significant, and wealth is clearly one of them, forgets an important fact. Beneath the roles we play, regardless of our status, fame, power, or wealth, we are still people made in the image of God. Neither poverty nor riches are the direct result of an individual person’s achievement, but rather, the providence of God determines such matters. Those who oppress the poor or withhold what is due to them, insult their Maker, which makes them worthy of respect so that mistreating them is an affront to their Maker, but those who are kind to the needy honor their Maker (14:31 B). The poor and the oppressor or fraudulent or contentious have this in common: as in 22:2 and 20:12, the Lord gives light to the eyes, and thus gave life, to both of them (29:13 C). In a similar insight, do not laugh at a blind person, tease the dwarf, injure the affairs of the lame, or tease one who is in the hand of the god, for humanity is clay and straw, but the god is the builder, tearing down and building up every day (The Instruction of Amen-em-opet, p. 243). Oppressing the poor to enrich oneself and giving to the rich, or to profit by withholding what is due to the poor is like making gifts to the rich, which is pure loss and will lead only to loss (22:16 C). In a similar insight, do not be greedy for the property of the poor nor be hungry for their bread (The Instruction of Amen-em-opet, p. 240). One who augments wealth by exorbitant interest gathers it for another who is kind to the poor (28:8 C). In the Torah, if one lends money to an Israelite who is needy, it is not a business deal so charge no interest (Exodus 22:25). If an Israelite becomes poor, do not take interest or profit from them, but fear God, so that they may continue to live among them (Leviticus 25:35-6). They may charge interest to a foreigner, but not an Israelite, so that the Lord may bless them in all they do (Deuteronomy 23:20). In a similar insight, guard yourself against robbing the oppressed and against overbearing the disabled (The Instruction of Amen-em-opet, p. 237). In another such insight, if you find a large debt against a poor person, make it into three parts, forgive two and let one stand, for better is praise as one who loves people than riches in a storehouse (The Instruction of Amen-em-opet, p. 241). Those who mock the poor insult their Maker and those glad at calamity or misfortune that befalls another will not unpunished (17:5 C), reminding us that the poor are the handiwork of the Lord and worthy of respect, so mistreating them is an affront to their Maker. In a similar insight, God desires respect for the poor more than the honoring of the exalted (The Instruction of Amen-em-opet, p. 243). The righteous know the rights and just claims of the poor while the wicked have no such understanding (29:7 C). In a similar insight, blessed are you O Lord, for you have never abandoned the orphan nor despised the poor (The Book of Hymns, p. 155). Whoever is kind to the poor lends to the Lord and will be repaid in full (19:17 C). Whoever gives to the poor will lack nothing, but one who turns a blind eye will get many a curse (28:27 C).

8 Whoever sows injustice will reap calamity (or trouble), and the rod of anger will fail (or the rod of the anger of God will destroy).[2]

This proverb is Class C proverb, suggesting influence from the prophetic tradition.[3]

The combination sow/reap is one we find in wisdom and prophetic literature as an idiom for undertaking actions and suffering the consequences of those actions. Those who plow iniquity will reap iniquity (Job 4:8). The prayer is that those who sow in tears will reap with joy (Psalm 126:5). Those who observe the winds and clouds will neither sow nor reap (Ecclesiastes 11:4). Those who sow wheat reap thorns (Jeremiah 12:18). They sow wind and reap the whirlwind (Hosea 8:7). If they sow righteousness they will reap steadfast love (Hosea 10:12). 

9 God blesses those who are generous, for they share their bread with the poor.

This proverb is a Class B proverb, concerned with social relationships.[4]

The kind person is benevolent and has concern for the poor.  The life the Lord blesses is not in selfishness but in love for the neighbor.  Although people do receive blessing from God in the Hebrew Bible, the word does not occur frequently in Proverbs. In the other two instances (5:18; 20:21), it refers to inanimate objects.

Wealth should not be an index of worth.  This proverb is not a polemic against wealth. The biblical tradition frequently compares riches, explicitly or implicitly, with other values (such as a good name or wisdom or virtue). While the tradition does not despise riches, the tradition considers them wanting in comparison to other goods. Thus, since Solomon did not ask for riches, God grants Solomon’s request for the wisdom to rule Israel wisely (1 Kings 3:5-11).  One needs to find refuge in God rather than riches (Psalm 52:7). Do not set your heart on riches (Psalm 62:10). Riches will bring no profit when at the time of death (Proverbs 11:4). Trusting in riches will cause one to wither, while righteousness will bring one to flourishing (Proverbs 11:28). The riches of this life will strangle the growth of the word in one’s life (Luke 8:14). One ought not to have pride in riches or set their hopes on the uncertainty of riches, but rather on God who provides with everything for our enjoyment (I Timothy 6:17). Taking pride in riches does not come from the Father, but rather, comes from attachment to the world (I John 2:16). The matters of wealth and poverty play no less a role in wisdom literature than they do in prophetic literature or parabolic literature. Riches are a fortress for those who have it, while poverty is the ruin of those who are poor (Proverbs 10:15). Riches are so valuable in social standing that some will pretend to have it, while others who have riches will pretend to be poor (Proverbs 13:7). The poor have few friends while the rich have many friends (Proverbs 14:20). The poor will plead with others while the rich answer roughly (Proverbs 18:23). The rich rule the poor (Proverbs 22:7). Oppressing the poor in order to enrich oneself will lead to loss (Proverbs 22:16). In general, though, the orientation of wisdom literature toward riches tends to be more approving or cautionary than critical. Thus, the reward for humility and fear of the Lord is riches (Proverbs 22:4). 

Although much of the advice given in Proverbs would be appropriate for the education of a courtier-in-training, the “favor” one seeks here is general approval based on a sound reputation, rather than the favor of idiosyncratic favoritism. Widespread acceptance among one’s contemporaries was a matter in which to take pride in the world of Proverbs, a perspective that would shift dramatically in the biblical tradition by the time of the New Testament, where Jesus offers a beatitude upon those who falsely revile and speak evil against followers of Jesus (Matthew 5:11).

Verses 22-23 comes from a collection of Thirty Wise Sayings that bear a striking similarity to a collection from the Ancient Egyptian sage Amen-em-ope (1100 BC). The first saying considers robbing the poor, do not rob the poor or weak because they are poor or weak, or crush the afflicted at the gate, where justice was administered, and public business transacted, for their weakness is good reason not to cheat them; part of the Book of the Covenant as well as it commands participants not to cheat the poor (Exodus 23:6), for the Lord pleads their cause and despoils of life those who despoil them, suggesting that if the poor do not have a human protector, they have a divine protector. We find this sentiment in the Book of the Covenant as well, where the Lord will hear the cry of the widow and orphan and kill with the sword those who take advantage of these two groups in Israel (Exodus 22:22-24). Robbing a poor person shows both cowardice and injustice.  Legal proceedings are in mind.  The poor may not have resources to get justice, but the Lord will fight their case. The system of justice in ancient Israel was that village elders or city rulers administered justice at the gate. Boaz would negotiate his marriage before ten elders at the gate (Ruth 4:1-6). When Jerusalem fell to Babylon, its king sat in the middle of the gate (Jeremiah 39:3). The purpose for hearing cases in so public a place was to allow many and random witnesses to act as a safeguard against the perverting of justice in private trials. The point is that rulers were not to take advantage of the poor, for the LORD, dispenser of all justice, is their advocate, an idea found throughout the Hebrew Bible.

Psalm 19 (Year B September 11-17) is a hymn that unites creation, torah, and a petition to hear the prayer. The combination of creation and law is not unique to this Psalm. Psalm 119:73 ties together God’s creation and God’s law, where the writer affirms the Lord has fashioned him and given him understanding so that he can learn the commandments of the Lord. The ordered universe and the order provided by Torah receive praise. The discovery of ancient Near Easter texts where justice is often part of the realm of the sun god has offered a way to understand the unity of the psalm. The revelation of God in heaven unites with the revelation of God on the earth.

Verses 1-6 emphasizes the beauty and order of nature as wordless testimony to the excellence of God. It is a hymn that focuses on creation and especially the sun. The absence of the covenantal name for God in Israel, Yahweh, suggests to some that an Israelite poet has adapted a non-Israelite hymn praising the sun to Israelite worship. The same experience that inspired Psalm 8 inspired verses 1-6. Psalm 8 begins by declaring the majesty of the Lord from among all the earth. The Lord has set the divine glory about the heavens. This leads to reflection on the dignity of humanity. Here, the focus is on the peculiar character of the revelation of God in nature. These verses join other passages of the Bible that speak of the creative work of God.[5] The cosmos praises God. Creation testifies to the greatness of God. The contemplation of nature leads the author to see that it serves God. The works of the master reveal the master. The destiny of creatures is to praise and honor God and extol divine glory.[6] The wordless testimony of creation becomes a music of the spheres, an idea later associated with Pythagoras. An Ugaritic epic speaks of speech of tree and whisper of stone, converse of heaven and earth. It may even mean that the celestial bodies speak soundlessly. They convey their message through their being. Even though nature is speaking, people do not hear its voice. For that reason, then, we cannot read nature as a plain or obvious witness that leads to the praise of God. In the ancient Near East, the sun was typically associated with a major deity. Cylinder seals with winged sun disks have been found in Israel. Josiah removed objects fashioned as horses that had been dedicated to the sun (II Kings 23:11), providing evidence for solar worship in ancient Israel. In terms of the influence of this passage on theological reflection, we need to recognize that the claim that nature is the work of God is always debatable.[7] Yet, when we join the psalmist in such praise of God, we anticipate the eschatological praising of God. The wonders of the universe can reveal the excellence and beauty of God for those who have eyes to see.[8] For this poet, then, the contemplation of nature leads him to see that even nature serves God. The works of the master reveal the master. The destiny of all creatures is to offer praise and honor to God and extol divine glory.[9] The divine ordering of nature speaks in a language everyone can understand. Nature gives knowledge of God to the world. Many persons in the ancient world sing the praise of objects in nature. For the psalmist, while nature is an inanimate object, human beings still approach it with wonder. As in Genesis 1, God created sun, moon, and stars and their movement. The word “create” does not occur, but God “set a tent for the sun.” As powerful and pervasive as is the light and heat of the sun, it belongs to God. Creation is voiceless. Yet, it resonates universal praise back to its creator.

We can observe a certain type of logic here. The movement of the objects we see in space can make us puzzle about how such movement began. Such reflections can lead us from the contingency of all finite things to the notion of a necessary Being, which we might call God, who is behind all that we see and study in nature. While many things have being, this would suggest the Greatest Being of all, which we would call God. Each part of creation seems uniquely fitted for its purpose. Each part of our bodies has their purpose that could not exist apart from its participation in the body. This fact may make it appear that an intelligent being designed it this way, which we would call God. The wonderfully complex diversity of creation seems to demand one who designed it. The best one might say, though, is that such reasoning may provide a hint of the divine, but the hint is ambiguous, given the resistance we see in suffering and evil. Even Charles Darwin and Thomas Henry Huxley described themselves as agnostic regarding the divine and ultimate matters. The deeper point is that neither the scientist nor the Christian has anything to fear from the other. We have a common drive toward truth. We are trying to put it together, even if we do so in distinctly diverse ways. For science to demand scientific proof of our ultimate questions is for it to step beyond its purpose. For religion to demand scientific evidence for its belief in God is to make a demand science cannot give.

Many composers and hymn writers have written settings to biblical and other words of praise for and by God’s creation. One thinks of Haydn’s “The Heavens Are Telling,” from The Creation. One also thinks of such hymns as “All Creatures of our God and King” (which tracks the words of a prayer by St. Francis of Assisi). Its refrain of “Praise Him” and “Alleluia” summarizes well the spirit of these verses. It invites nature to lift its voice with us as believers as we offer this praise to God. It begins with inviting sun and moon to do so. It invites them to “find a voice” and “Make music for the Lord to hear.” Mother earth also unfolds blessings toward humanity, including flowers and fruits. It then invites human beings “of tender heart, forgiving others,” to take its part in offering such praise in song. Even those who bear “pain and sorrow” are to offer their praise to God on whom they case their care. Even Death is “kind and gentle” as it leads us home in the way Christ has led. All things worship the Creator with humbleness. I think of “How Great Thou Art,” which invites us to consider the worlds and stars the hand of God has made. They display the power of God. His soul sings of the greatness of God. “This Is My Father’s World” that to his “listening ears, All nature sings, and round me rings the music of the spheres.” Rocks, trees, skies, and seas are wonders from the hand of God. Birds raise carols and lilies declare the praise of their Maker. He hears the Father pass “in the rustling grass” and “speaks to me everywhere.” “Morning Has Broken” offers praise for the singing and morning, “God’s recreation of the new day.” “Cantemos al SeƱor” (“Let’s Sing unto the Lord”) invites us to sing praise “at the new day’s fresh beginning.” God made sky, stars, sun, and oceans filled with beauty. The hymn of adoration is to show the love, faith, and hope of all creation. Through all the Lord has made, we praise the greatness of the Lord. Finally, the last verse of “Love Divine, all Loves Excelling” reminds us that creation is imperfect enough that we have the hope of a new creation, as we pray that God would finish the new creation so that we might see salvation and find our restoration in God.

Considering all this, I invite you to ponder the following, in the light of the entirety of Psalm 19. God created human beings as the culmination of creation, as Psalm 8:5 makes clear in the light of Genesis 1:26-31. Such a standing in creation gives humanity the special purpose of reflecting and expressing divine glory. Question 1 of the Westminster Larger Catechism reads, “What is the chief and highest end of man?” The answer: “Man’s chief and highest end is to glorify God, and fully to enjoy him forever.” We follow Jesus Christ, the one who fully reflects the imago dei. Do we glorify God by our own words, lives, and ministries?

Verses 7-10 are a hymn focusing on Torah. It has a close relationship to Psalm 119. They share many of the same words as synonyms for Torah: law, decrees, precepts, commandments or instruction. We also find this section suffused with wisdom terminology, including simple, wise, and the fear of the Lord, and wisdom or Torah being compared to gold. It reminds us of the power of Torah to bring joy and purpose to a human life. We can see the delight in the Torah and the benefits of following it. It brings joy and blessing to those who obey it. Those who turn away from the way the Lord will receive the reverse, as we find in Psalm 1, 111-112, and Deuteronomy 30. Torah is a revelation of the will of the Lord. He has such a joyful confidence in the Torah that it has become higher than all earthly values. Do we have a similar view to the psalmist who declares that knowing and following instructions from the Lord and the ways of the Lord is more valuable even than having a lot of money or indulging in tasty goodies? Jesus said, “My food is to do the will of him who sent me and to complete his work” (John 4:34). In Isaiah 55:1-3, the prophet invites those thirsty, even those who have no money, to come to the “waters,” and to “buy and eat” that which the Lord gives freely. He invites people not to spend money or labor on that which is not bread and does not satisfy. He invites us to eat what is good. He defines this as listening to the Lord so that we might live.

Verse 11-14 are a prayer of petition to be saved from sin and the Lord to hear the prayers of the poet. We learn that the chief reward of holding the revelation of Torah as precious is spiritual and focuses upon forgiveness. We do not have such wisdom on our own to detect our errors. Torah points them out. Yet is the statement true? I would suggest that only from a certain perspective. Human beings naturally detect error in self and others. We naturally develop a conscience through our interactions with others. The conscience detects right and wrong in our behavior and in the behavior of others. One brand of psychology calls this the “superego.” The point is, each culture detects varying behaviors as right and wrong, but human beings are naturally aware of the need to discern the difference between right and wrong. Thus, without Torah, yes, we would still detect error. Yet, we are also naturally aware of our capacity for self-deception. In this sense, revelation provides a reference point outside us by which we can detect right and wrong. To put the matter bluntly, we may wonder if God exists and whether we are to live lives accountable to God, but Torah does not wonder. Torah commands honor of God in our worship, speech, and use of our time. We may wonder if respecting parents, the property of others, telling the truth, faithfulness to a spouse or other matters, are right, good, and moral. Torah does not wonder. Torah says Yes, such behavior deserves respect and fulfillment in our lives. Torah will not tell us everything we are to do with our lives, and Torah will not tell unambiguously what to do in every situation. However, Torah will provide broad knowledge of the type of person we are to become and discern what that type of person would do in this situation. The conclusion invites the Lord to give our inner talk scrutiny and correction. Welcoming this divine knowing and shaping of our inner talk deepens our vulnerability, which is a key step in our spiritual formation. His reference to the heart reminds us that obedience to Torah is not simply an outward matter. Obedience is a matter of the heart. In Deuteronomy 6:1-6, they are to teach the decrees and commandments so that they will fear the Lord and have a long life. In Deuteronomy 30:11-14, the commandments are not too hard for them and are not far away, but in their mouths and hearts. Jeremiah 31:31-34 will promise a new covenant with the law put within them, writing it on their hearts.[10] His heart meditation is that the Lord will find in the words of his mouth and the meditations of his heart an acceptable offering.[11] Even today, preachers, poets, and musicians will wisely pray this portion of the psalm as they prepare and join their congregations in presenting the offering of this day to the Lord.

This psalm connects with the Old Testament lesson in its reflection upon wisdom.

Proverbs 1:20-33 (Year B September 11-17) with close parallels in 8:1 ff. and 9:1 ff, has the theme of wisdom as preacher. The personification of wisdom here is a literary device created as a vivid and memorable way of speaking about human wisdom. These verses become a theological reason for this supremacy of wisdom. Lady Wisdom possesses divine authority, proclaiming the righteous ways of the Lord wherever people gather. Wisdom is not secret or esoteric, but public, frequenting the busiest parts of the city and calling to all to accept her. Wisdom (personified as a woman) calls out appealingly to all of us to listen and learn from her. She calls out wherever one finds human beings. It is to our peril to turn away our ears and hearts and lives from the ways of Wisdom. Wisdom goes walking through the city streets waylaying the inhabitants to press her teaching on them, denouncing their heedlessness and false sense of security, as in Amos 6:1, 9:10, and Zephaniah 1:12. Thus, the content of what wisdom cries is nothing other than the well-known preaching of repentance, judgment, and salvation. Even the wording could be that of a prophet.[12] Wisdom castigates the simple, scoffers, and dullards who are indifferent to the rebuke of wisdom. The result is that Wisdom will mock them when disaster overtakes them. The time will come when it is too late to listen. They will seek Wisdom but not find because they hated knowledge and the fear of the Lord. They refused the advice of Wisdom. Wisdom has a revelatory character. She becomes a gushing spring that has abundant water, overflowing to all who acknowledge and submit to her. Wherever we human beings gather, Wisdom actively and invitingly seeks us out, calls out to us, and pours out her thoughts to us. She thus takes the role of God’s prophet or preacher, inviting the listener to turn away from the ways of Folly and to learn and live out the wisdom of God. The wisdom from God is not secret, cryptic, or mysterious. God wants you to know it, to learn it, and to live it. To love knowledge is to have respect for the Lord. Proverbs also associates understanding in poetic parallelism with wisdom. Wisdom relies upon the revelation of the Lord in Torah. Wisdom educates, of course, but it also involves the discipline of learning from revelation and relies upon illumination from the Lord. Even with parallels to other ancient Near Eastern literature, Proverbs identifies wisdom/Wisdom with specifically Israelite religion. Their punishment becomes the natural consequences of their actions. Actions have consequences for good or ill. Your actions are the seed and the consequences are the fruit. Thus, rather than receiving God’s blessings, they will “reap what they sow.” Wisdom sees judgment as the consequences of their actions. See parallels in Deuteronomy 28 and 30, where receiving God’s blessing or God’s curse depends on whether the people of Israel obey (more literally “listen to”) the LORD. In contrast, prophets often thought in terms of judgment from God. Lady Wisdom wants us to listen to her, and to each other. If we do not, wisdom will laugh right back, because it will bring calamity and distress if we do not listen. Think of it this way. If you break the Ten Commandments, you will hurt yourself. If you ignore the Beatitudes, you will never know the kingdom of God. If you fail to love God and neighbor, you will miss a distinctively Christian life. Wisdom offers security and a good life, one without fear to all who respond favorably to her message. Wisdom offers safety and peace. When we listen and act wisely, we will be better off. The search for wisdom is the search for wholeness, a beautiful life, a productive life, and a life full of joy, happiness, and human flourishing.

The wisdom the Bible offers is in so many places. Yet, for most of us, we find a few places that summarize what we read in the Bible. The Apostles’ Creed summarize core doctrines but think of the places that reflect guidance for living. You think of the Ten Commandments, the Beatitudes, the Great Commandment, the list of virtues and vices by Paul, the Sermon on the Mount, I Corinthians 13, and I imagine more. The wisdom is there because God has not hidden it.

Psalm 1 (Psalm 1, Year B, Seventh Sunday of Easter, Year B September 18-24, and Year C Epiphany 6) shows the poet can offer devotional instructions on what it takes to live a holy life. Sometimes, people need to hear words of affirmation regarding the course they are following. This psalm reminds us of the happiness we can find in following the way God prescribed. It has a simplicity, but one that masks its difficulty. This psalm points us to the blessedness or the life of human flourishing that relies upon the Lord. Those who compiled the Psalter did not choose to begin with a psalm whose first words cited David as its author or gave instructions for musicians or singers. Rather, the whole Psalter begins with devotional instructions on what it takes to live a holy life, which will in turn lead to a happy and fruitful life. The Psalm assumes that each of us has a choice as to the kind of people we will be.

Character is the fruit of personal choice‑‑and exertion.  We do not inherit it from parents. We do not have it as an appendage to our birth, to wealth, or station in life. Character is the result of our endeavors to respond to the challenges of life. Character is the result and reward of "good principles sown in the course of a lifetime of virtuous and honorable action" (J. Dawes). One way to think of character is by what you are willing to do when the spotlight is turned off what you are doing, the applause has died down, and no one is around to give you credit.

The psalm begins with a contrast of two ways. Its concern is to show how readers can be Happy (‘ashrei), fortunate, rich, blessed, and prosperous. Such a person has discovered what it means to live a life in harmony with God. However, becoming wise in this way takes more than a sheer acquisition of knowledge. Israelite wisdom tradition does not value knowledge for its own sake; it values wisdom, which combines piety, humility, and a right reverence for God with a deep understanding and appreciation for how God intends the world to work. Think of Genesis 2, where a stream of water flows from the earth and provides for trees in the Garden of Eden. Think of Jeremiah 17, where the prophet contrasts the shrubs in the desert with the tree planted by life-giving water. John used the concept of “living water” to have Jesus describe the nurturing relationship of God to the Samaritan woman (John 4). Paul talks about living a life that is “rooted” in Christ (Colossians 2:6-7). Our willingness to root our lives in a relationship with God, a relationship characterized by obedience, is what yields true happiness and a life that yields “fruit.” Just as the wicked may offer their advice, and the sinner may offer leadership, the cynical and disrespectful may achieve prominent office in society. Such persons hold in contempt the value of wisdom and moral uprightness. They “know better” than what Israel has received in Torah. When we are full of self and our resources, we have no room for God. The person who is wise and hopes to become “happy” because of that wisdom will avoid such persons and associations. One way to think of this is our relationship to the culture that forms us. Today, we might need to think of our sub-culture or tribe. Some of its values may well be godly, even where it does not know it as such. Some of its values may not be so. Our happiness is in learning the difference. Wisdom develops a form of resistance when it needs to resist. Throughout the psalm, the image of traveling on the right path in life recurs. By both opening and closing the psalm with the image of the “way” the psalmist stresses that those who wish to live a life whose value will live on in the world after them must walk the life-path that God sanctions.

The focus upon Torah, or for the Christian, the Word of God as a faithful witness to the revelation of God in Israel and in Jesus Christ, is the path that helps us to maintain ourselves as the people of God in distinction from our tribe. Genuine flourishing, blessing, and joy are not in the values of the culture or tribe in which we find ourselves. Virtue is a state of character gained by repeatedly performing good actions.[13] Virtue is an acquired excellence of character that renders a person capable over the long haul of behaving in certain reliable ways.[14] Thus, the law is a source of joy for it reveals the will of the Lord. Without the event of revelation of Torah, which means God’s “teaching” (from the Hebrew verb yrh, “to teach”), one cannot be wise.

While the righteous have deep roots, the wicked are like chaff. A simple gust of wind can blow away chaff. Jeremiah 17:6-7 says they are like shrubs in the desert that do not see relief and no longer bear fruit. If their lives are on the surface, they will not withstand judgment from the Lord. What we need for human flourishing, happiness and blessedness is to have a life properly rooted and grounded. Like the roots of a tree, the source of such a life is real, but hidden below the surface. Such a life has its roots in a relationship with God in which we accept the guidance that God gives for the way we live. Such a life acknowledges its dependence upon the Lord. It will also not allow adverse circumstances or challenges to carry it away.

Proverbs 31:10-31 (Year B September 18-24) is a song of praise, an acrostic idyllic poem, to the ideal wife. The mental image that guides the author is that of the ideal wife and the general theme, but he does not directly connect to what precedes or follows. It is a description of a wife of quality. Acrostics are beautifully and carefully constructed works of poetry, and this poem provides a fitting conclusion to a book extolling the virtues of wisdom. In fact, the woman described here is the living embodiment of the teachings of Lady Wisdom throughout Proverbs.[15] The woman described in the closing verses of this book is anything but typical. But neither is Lady Wisdom in chapters 1-9 of Proverbs, so this poem makes a fitting conclusion to a book with unusually prominent feminine imagery. 

In its canonical form, the composition is the advice in the form of an oracle of a queen mother — the mother of King Lemuel, a figure known only from this passage. The two originally separate parts of the chapter share some vocabulary, structure, and themes, and in their present form present the stark contrast between the ways of a self-indulgent ruler (vv. 1-9, including the danger of giving one’s “strength to women,” v. 3) and the benefits that come from having an ideal wife (vv. 10-31). As an oracle, the highly stylized literary form of the acrostic was understood in wisdom circles, at least, as a legitimate expression of prophecy by a woman.

The book of Proverbs has been devoted to inculcating the ideal of a wise man. It now concludes with a poem describing a wise woman, praising her energy her economic talents, and her personal virtues. This is an ideal, a paragon of female virtues. These virtues are shared by the ideal man described throughout this book. She is a proud and splendid woman, a mistress of a prosperous manor. This woman has considerable independence in interacting with outsiders and conducting business, even in acquiring real estate. This allows her husband to spend his time sitting in the city gates, conducting civic business, and serving as a judge. This woman has a husband, children, and is an ideal woman.

The poem begins with an exclamation of her value, not her rarity. Beneath all the virtue and talents of this woman lies a deep and solid strength of character. Such a wife is, like wisdom (3:13, 15), as precious as jewels. The husband has complete confidence in her, and like the Lord and the heeding of wisdom (1:20-33; 8:17-21), brings gain and prosperity. The portrayal of this woman in primarily of her economic function is unique.[16] She is of immense value as a partner for life. The woman described is striking in her entrepreneurial abilities. The lifestyle described here is more like that of the woman of the manor than it is of an ordinary farm wife. She can turn these raw materials into finished articles of various kinds. She is a weaver (vv. 13, 19, 22), which was an ancient Near Eastern profession dominated by women, so much so that the Egyptian hieroglyph for weaving features a female figure. One did not weave just for one's family; cloth was a valuable commodity that one might trade for items that one's own household did not produce. Like a merchant with a fleet of trading ships, she uses her weaving to allow her to trade for food produced elsewhere. The poet describes the setting as “her household,” unusual in that the head of the household is the male. She has a capacity for sustained work. She is a good administrator in that she oversees a staff. She has a sharp eye for business opportunities. She earns money as a dressmaker that allows her to buy a vineyard.  The vineyard will produce grapes and wine for trade and consumption. She takes care of her household while also caring for the households of others, especially the poor, a virtue that applies ot all persons. She cares for the entire household, which includes servants and their families. The city gates were the location of most civic affairs, legal hearings, and business transactions (see, for example, Ruth 4 and 2 Samuel 15:2), and as in most traditional societies, segregation of the sexes was the norm in ancient Israel, and the public presence of women of all classes was carefully regulated. A man’s reputation “in the city gates” and “among the elders of the land” was dependent upon his own actions; that his wife could enhance that reputation by her own was undoubtedly a fact “on the ground” in ancient Israel, but not ordinarily commented upon in the Bible. She is wise and kind. She works hard and is attentive to the needs of her household. The fear of the Lord is the summit of human wisdom and involves the theological or theoretical aspect of wisdom in Israel. This culminating virtue of the woman of strength is also the starting point of wisdom in 1:7, 9:10 and its high point in 2:5. Recurrent themes sounded throughout the book of Proverbs — the fear of the Lord, thrift, kindness, honesty, the importance of a good reputation, the deceitful nature of charm and the ephemeral nature of human beauty — appear in rapid succession at the close of the poem.

 



[1]—John Henry Newman.

[2] The word translated “calamity” can also be translated “trouble” (with the Revised English Bible), and the second half of the clause — “and the rod of anger will fail” — is gnomic to the point of obscurity. The Revised English Bible’s “The rod of God’s anger will destroy him” makes good sense, albeit through expansion of the Hebrew (“God” does not appear in the original text, nor is there a direct object for the verb “destroy”). The only other occurrence of the construct chain “rod of his anger” (which is what the Hebrew literally says) is found in Lamentations 3:1, where the expression refers to the rod of God’s wrath, which lends support for the REB translation (anticipated by the lexicon of Brown, Driver and Briggs, 720).

[3] Weiser, Old Testament Library.

[4] Weiser, Old Testament Library.

[5] Psalm 8; Psalm 89:5 ff.; Psalm 104; Genesis 1-2; Isaiah 40:26-31; 42:5; chapters 43 and 45 passim; Amos 4:12-13; Job 38-41; Romans 1:19-20, 25. Several NT passages declare that all creation is through Jesus Christ, God’s creating embodied Word: John 1:1-5, 14; Hebrews 1:1-4; Colossians 1:15-23; Revelation 3:14. Creation yearns for redemption in Romans 8:18-23, 38-39. For “new heavens and a new earth” see Isaiah 65:17 ff.; Isaiah 66:22; 2 Peter 3:13; Revelation 21:1; for further passages about new creation see 2 Corinthians 5:17; Galatians 6:15; Ephesians 4:24 (= Colossians 3:10).

[6] (Pannenberg, Systematic Theology 1998, 1991) Volume 2, 56. 

[7] (Pannenberg, Systematic Theology 1998, 1991) Volume 2, 162. 

[8] (Pannenberg, Systematic Theology 1998, 1991), Volume 3, 646.

[9] (Pannenberg, Systematic Theology 1998, 1991) Volume 2, 56. 

[10] Deuteronomy 6:1-6; 

Now this is the commandment—the statutes and the ordinances—that the Lord your God charged me to teach you to observe in the land that you are about to cross into and occupy, 2 so that you and your children and your children’s children may fear the Lord your God all the days of your life, and keep all his decrees and his commandments that I am commanding you, so that your days may be long. 3 Hear therefore, O Israel, and observe them diligently, so that it may go well with you, and so that you may multiply greatly in a land flowing with milk and honey, as the Lord, the God of your ancestors, has promised you.

4 Hear, O Israel: The Lord is our God, the Lord alone.[a] 5 You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might. 6 Keep these words that I am commanding you today in your heart.

Deuteronomy 30:11-14 

11 Surely, this commandment that I am commanding you today is not too hard for you, nor is it too far away. 12 It is not in heaven, that you should say, “Who will go up to heaven for us, and get it for us so that we may hear it and observe it?” 13 Neither is it beyond the sea, that you should say, “Who will cross to the other side of the sea for us, and get it for us so that we may hear it and observe it?” 14 No, the word is very near to you; it is in your mouth and in your heart for you to observe.

and Jeremiah 31:31-34 and frequently elsewhere in Jeremiah. 

31 The days are surely coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. 32 It will not be like the covenant that I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt—a covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, says the Lord. 33 But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 No longer shall they teach one another, or say to each other, “Know the Lord,” for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, says the Lord; for I will forgive their iniquity, and remember their sin no more.

[11] [James L. Mays, Psalms Interpretation commentary, 100].

[12] (Barth, Church Dogmatics 2004, 1932-67)II.1 [30.3] 428).

[13] Aristotle 

[14] Thomas Hibbs

[15] Carole Fontaine ("Proverbs," The Women's Bible Commentary, Sharon Ringe and Carol Newsom, eds. [Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1992], 151-52).

[16] Carol Meyer (Discovering Eve: Ancient Israelite Women in Context [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988], 180). 

Saturday, July 8, 2017

Matthew 11:16-19, 25-30


Matthew 11:16-19, 25-30

16 “But to what will I compare this generation? It is like children sitting in the marketplaces and calling to one another,
17 ‘We played the flute for you, and you did not dance;
we wailed, and you did not mourn.’
18 For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say, ‘He has a demon’; 19 the Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they say, ‘Look, a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!’ Yet wisdom is vindicated by her deeds.” 

25 At that time Jesus said, “I thank you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and the intelligent and have revealed them to infants; 26 yes, Father, for such was your gracious will. 27 All things have been handed over to me by my Father; and no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and anyone to whom the Son chooses to reveal him. 

28 “Come to me, all you that are weary and are carrying heavy burdens, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me; for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.” 

            Matthew 11:16-17 concerns a saying of Jesus related to his relationship with John the Baptist. It uses the image of children in the marketplace. The saying is from the material Matthew and Luke share. They show the solidarity of Jesus and John. He compares his contemporaries to children sitting in the marketplace. Of course, children would not do this, for they would be running around and screaming. His image is that they harass each other. They play the flute, as if for the celebration at a wedding, but they do not dance. This might refer to the celebrative style of the ministry of Jesus. They mourn as if they were professional mourners at a funeral, but they do not weep. This might refer to the stern style of the ministry of John.  His contemporaries are like spoiled children. John and Jesus unite in calling people to the rule of God, but vary in style. His contemporaries do not respond to either style.

            Matthew 11:18-19 is a slur on the style of Jesus. The saying is from the material Matthew and Luke share. The accusation against John was that he had a demon because his ministry was austere and somber. The accusation against Jesus was that his style of ministry was celebrative to the point of gluttony and drunkenness, making him a friend of tax collectors and sinners. The accusation leveled at Jesus was especially serious given its basis in the Torah. “He will not obey us. He is a glutton and a drunkard. Then all the men of the town shall stone him to death. So you shall purge the evil from your midst; and all Israel will hear, and be afraid” (Deut 21:20-21). Furthermore, Proverbs advises, “Be not among winebibbers, or among gluttonous eaters of meat” (Prov 23:20). Such a saying contrasts John the ascetic with Jesus the glutton and drunk. The crowd discounts John because his abstinence is too strict, while the crowd rejects Jesus because his behavior is not strict enough. They find everything too hard, too soft, too hot, and too cold. Yet, his contemporaries would show wisdom if they received both John and Jesus. Barth refers to the wisdom of this generation and that true wisdom is always different from what this generation has expected and desired.[1] The whole passage may be a call by Jesus not to sit upon the sidelines as an uninvolved spectator.  Do not live under any illusions. The point is not the difference in their styles but the unity of their message.

            Matthew 11:25-27 is a saying concerning good news revealed to the simple. The source is the material in common between Matthew and Luke. Jesus seems to paraphrase Psalm 8:2. He is thankful to the Father for hiding “these things” from the intelligent (scribes and Pharisees) and revealing them to the simple (the disciples and the crowds). True wisdom is in seeing the message of the rule of God that unites the ministry of John and Jesus. The healings and exorcisms of Jesus are signs of that rule. Jesus seems to have largely failed in reaching out to the scribes and Pharisees, but to have been more successful among the crowds. He contrasts the many that rejected Jesus with the few who accept him. Jesus is now thankful for this result.[2] This leads Jesus to reflect upon the unique relationship he has with the Father. This text shows the confidence of Jesus has its basis in the intimate relationship between Son and the Father. He explains his subordination to the Father in terms of the filial relationship of Father and Son. It denotes the special dignity of the Son.[3] Even the pre-Easter Jesus can claim that the Father gives him all things.[4] We cannot think of the Father apart from the Son.[5] Because the royal rule of the Father is present in and through Jesus, because the eternal Son has taken human form in him, the Father has imparted divine power to him.[6] God is infinitely above all that is human and creaturely. One may know God only through the Son. To know the incomprehensible God we must hold fast to the Son.[7] Only here is the concept of revelation set forth as a formal principle of the knowledge of faith.[8] The Son is the mediator of revelation, but not the revelation of the Father. The function of the Son corresponds to that of the angel in the receiving of revelation by the apocalyptic seer. In essence, Christ gives a revelation he has received from the Father.[9]
            Matthew 11:28-30 is a saying with theme of the yoke and burden. The source is material unique to Matthew. Ecclesiasticus 51:23-27 has similar sentiments. In urging people to come to him, he places the emphasis on a relationship with him rather than the Torah. Instead of the law that the Pharisees tried to force upon people, he offers himself as a “yoke of wisdom.” Jewish apocalyptic often has esoteric roadmaps describing mysterious journeys through the heavens. He denounces teachers of the Law in Matthew 23:1-4 and Luke 12:45-46, saying they have loaded people with burdens hard to bear (see also Acts 15:10). The easy yoke and light burden could also connote the promise of forgiveness for those bowed under the weight of their sin, who turn to Jesus in repentance and faith. He offers rest in the sense of assurance and confidence that arises from a relationship with Jesus. His own gentleness and humility assures the restless of his generation that a relationship with Jesus will lead to an easy and light yoke. People will not be coming to Torah or to an abstract doctrine, but to wisdom in the person of Jesus. They are to learn from him. He calls people to join him. Jesus offers people a new way to understand, think, and act.


[1] Church Dogmatics II.1 [30.3] 436.
[2] Barth, Church Dogmatics IV.1 [59.1] 178.
[3] Systematic Theology, Volume 2, 372.
[4] Systematic Theology Volume 1, 312.
[5] Pannenberg, Systematic Theology Volume 2, 367.
[6] Pannenberg, Systematic Theology Volume 2, 391.
[7] Systematic Theology Volume 1, 308, 339.
[8] Systematic Theology Volume 1, 194.
[9] Systematic Theology Volume 1, 212.

Monday, September 14, 2015

James 3:1-12

James 3:1-12 (NRSV)
3 Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers and sisters, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness. 2 For all of us make many mistakes. Anyone who makes no mistakes in speaking is perfect, able to keep the whole body in check with a bridle. 3 If we put bits into the mouths of horses to make them obey us, we guide their whole bodies. 4 Or look at ships: though they are so large that it takes strong winds to drive them, yet they are guided by a very small rudder wherever the will of the pilot directs. 5 So also the tongue is a small member, yet it boasts of great exploits.
How great a forest is set ablaze by a small fire! 6 And the tongue is a fire. The tongue is placed among our members as a world of iniquity; it stains the whole body, sets on fire the cycle of nature, and is itself set on fire by hell. 7 For every species of beast and bird, of reptile and sea creature, can be tamed and has been tamed by the human species, 8 but no one can tame the tongue—a restless evil, full of deadly poison. 9 With it we bless the Lord and Father, and with it we curse those who are made in the likeness of God. 10 From the same mouth come blessing and cursing. My brothers and sisters, this ought not to be so. 11 Does a spring pour forth from the same opening both fresh and brackish water? 12 Can a fig tree, my brothers and sisters, yield olives, or a grapevine figs? No more can salt water yield fresh.

Year B
September 11-17
September 13, 2015
Cross~Wind UMC
Title: Good Words

Going deeper:
James 3:1-12 has the theme of controlling the tongue. 
To put it another way, before we share anything with anyone we have to listen to the inner voice. Before we use our audible voice, we should ask ourselves, “Is what I’m about to share here coming from a desire to build up the body of Christ and share God’s wisdom, or am I simply speaking to feed my own selfish ambition or to gain favor with the curious and caustic folks around me?”
James urges Christians to evidence their conversion in all aspects of their lives — not with their faith only, but with their actions (James 2:26) and words as well (3:1-12). For James, this forms a type of “identification through negation” of Christianity’s two main rivals — Judaism and Hellenistic religion. Christians are not to be mere philosophers with good answers to life’s questions like the adherents of Hellenistic religion, nor are they to be simply the possessors of a venerated faith such as Judaism. It is obvious from the content and style of the epistle, that its author knows both of these communities well.
Unlike our modern notion that words have no actual power, James insists that the tongue can do more real damage than a playground full of sticks and stones. Truly “hearing” the word, for James, means becoming one who turns those words into action (2:14-17). In this self-contained argument about speech ethics, James portrays reverence and fear before the power of the tongue. Although James exhorts teachers toward the proper use of speech throughout his epistle — implying that he believes the tongue can be somewhat controlled — this passage laments that the human tongue is ultimately too powerful to be tamed.
Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers and sisters, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness. 2 For all of us [he includes himself in the class of imperfect teachers] make many mistakes. [Pannenberg stresses the readiness to forgive.[1] The office of teacher carries great responsibility, with possible punishment severe.  They are in jeopardy.  No one is faultless in this offence, and concedes that he is included. The thesis of the argument is stated at the outset: Not many of you should become teachers because you will be judged more strictly. Preachers are especially cognizant of this observation about the power of speech. Some live by the sword and die by the sword, but teachers and preachers live by their words and die by their words. The authority of public teaching comes with the responsibility of speaking rightly. One major mistake can lead to a loss of authority.] Anyone who makes no mistakes in speaking is perfect [(teleioV) not flawless, but maturity through completion of training], able to keep the whole body in check with a bridle. [The thoughtless exercise of the gift of speech can bring a person to destruction.  Control of speech is the only way to perfection or maturity.  The body here might refer to the church. If so, it refers to demagogic speech. For others, the tongue is not just one among many things to master in life. The tongue is pre-eminent, able to keep the whole body (the whole self) in check. Regardless of what field of knowledge a teacher has mastered, the spoken word will be the necessary conduit for its transmission.]3 If we put bits into the mouths of horses to make them obey us, we guide their whole bodies. 4 Or look at ships: though they are so large that it takes strong winds to drive them, yet they are guided by a very small rudder wherever the will of the pilot directs. 5 So also the tongue is a small member, yet it boasts of great exploits. [Is silence better than speech?
When we read James’ epistle, we certainly get the impression that all forms of idle or venomous speech are strictly out of bounds for the Christian community. Chapter 3 is his famous treatise on the tongue, and there is some serious wisdom here for us to think about before we open our mouths to share some “interesting information” about someone else.
To understand James’ viewpoint here, we first need to look at how the cultures of the first-century world viewed speech in general. Today, words and idle speech bombard us every day in the form of gossip. In the Greek and Roman world, words contained an almost magical power. Ancient sages represented in the wisdom literature of Egypt, Plutarch, Seneca, and wisdom literature in the Bible, believed that silence was better than speech and that listening was the pathway to wisdom. One should guard human speech. A verse from the Apocrypha sums up this view nicely: “Honor and dishonor come from speaking, and the tongues of mortals may be their downfall” (Sirach 5:15). The biblical book of Proverbs is full of similar sentiments.
Moreover, as Ken Frantz reminds us, the ancient world depended on a strong oral tradition for the transference of cultural identity and mores from one generation to another. “Who, after all, would be more aware of the harmful nature of gossip than those steeped in an oral culture?” he says. No written texts exist that are attributable to Jesus. The dissemination of the good news depended for some time on the veracity of oral accounts. Gossip, therefore, was considered to be oral conduct that was especially egregious.
James employs a series of metaphors to indicate just how dangerous even a little bit of indiscreet speech can be. The tongue is a small part of the body, says James, but like the rudder on a ship or a bridle on a horse, the tongue can steer us either to the path of wisdom or toward destruction (3:1-5). It takes only a spark — a misplaced, unkind or untrue word — to burn down a community that has been nurtured and established like an old-growth forest (vv. 5-6). The tongue’s “deadly poison” is always just a word or two away from infecting a whole group (v. 8). The power of words to both bless and curse is a power not to be taken lightly, particularly when our words are directed at God and, more precisely, at people who are created in God’s image (v. 9).
However, James also recognized that there was a positive use for the tongue, and that is as a conduit for God’s own wisdom. “Who is wise and understanding among you?” he asked. “Show by your good life that your good works are done with gentleness born of wisdom” (v. 13). Our speech is merely the product of what is inside us. If we are filled with the wisdom and Spirit of God “from above,” then our speech will reflect that. That wisdom is “pure, then peaceable, gentle, willing to yield, full of mercy and good fruits, without a trace of partiality or hypocrisy” (v. 17). If, however, our speech is peppered with “envy and selfish ambition,” then that is evidence that our deeper motivation is “earthly, unspiritual, devilish” (v. 15). To put it another way, before we share anything with anyone we have to listen to the inner voice. Before we use our audible voice, we should ask ourselves, “Is what I’m about to share here coming from a desire to build up the body of Christ and share God’s wisdom, or am I simply speaking to feed my own selfish ambition or to gain favor with the curious and caustic folks around me?” When wielded by an authoritative teacher, the spoken word can guide a community as does a small tap on a ship’s rudder; however, it can also destroy a community as does an errant spark on a forest bed. “Which type of teacher are you?” James asks. “Are you the sure-handed equestrian, skillfully steering a beast more powerful than yourself? Or are you the duplicitous spring, pouring forth brackish water that irritates those whom you once nourished?” In Platonic and Stoic philosophy and in a typical Greek educational curriculum, the metaphors of the horseman and helmsman represented the power of human rationality over the human body. Just as a big object can be controlled by a small device, so can the whole body be controlled by the power of the mind. James applies these metaphors to the tongue, which is an extension of the human mind or reason. Indeed, the same Greek word (logoV) was used to mean a word, a story, an account and rationality itself. The logoV (reasoning process) of the human mind was expressed by the logoV (spoken words) of the tongue. Therefore, the tongue connected the mind and the body, thus offering a chance to bring the body under control.]
How great a forest is set ablaze by a small fire! 6 And the tongue is a fire. [We might think of the Pentecost narrative, where tongues as of fire rested over the heads of those gathered at the prayer meeting. The fires of Pentecost came from the Spirit and led to the conversion of many.] The tongue is placed among our members as a world of iniquity; it stains the whole body, sets on fire the cycle of nature, and is itself set on fire by hell. [Leahy notes that while the odd phrase, “setting on fire the wheel of birth” (3:6, NRSV: “sets on fire the cycle of nature”), has baffled many exegetes, phrases similar to this appear in the Orphic rites of Hellenistic religion (319). If this is the allusion we are meant to make, then the following phrase, “and is itself set on fire by Gehenna” (NRSV, “hell”), may be an allusion to the rituals of human sacrifice practiced in the original Valley of ben Hinnom from which the image of Gehenna is derived (Jeremiah 7:30-31). Such allusions would emphasize the point that the same tongue that the Holy Spirit may inspire to speak holy words, can also pronounce pagan rituals of the most appalling kind. For James, the words of the gospel are meant to inspire action as well as faith. Therefore, those who would teach must be able to control their own emotions so they can control the shape their words will take in the real world.] 7 For every species of beast and bird, of reptile and sea creature, can be tamed and has been tamed by the human species, 8 but no one can tame the tongue—a restless evil, full of deadly poison. [One wonders what social situation inspired James toward such a hyperbolic assessment. In early Christian communities, were there too many people trying to be teachers, thus fracturing the communities through their quarrelsome words? Alternatively, does he offer this critique generally to everyone, not just the teachers? One must assume the pessimistic conclusion focuses on unredeemed humanity.  Christ is the unspoken guide of the ship and the one who helps a person control the tongue. The sad fact of the matter, says James, is that while all manner of creatures can be tamed by humans who stand above the animal kingdom in their ability to use speech, the one animal that human beings can never seem to tame is their own impulsive nature. This is why not many should try to master the art of using words to educate others.] 9 With it we bless the Lord and Father, and with it we curse those who are made in the likeness of God. [The likeness of God has its root in Genesis 1:26-7 is a feature of all of us by creation. Christian theology had to work out the connections between them if it was to cling to the interrelation of our creation and redemption.[2]] 10 From the same mouth come blessing and cursing. My brothers and sisters, this ought not to be so. [Deceit characterizes an untamed tongue. The duplicity of the tongue is inextricable from the duplicity of the inner mind.] 11 Does a spring pour forth from the same opening both fresh and brackish water? [He compares preaching to bitter or sweet water.] 12 Can a fig tree, my brothers and sisters, yield olives, or a grapevine figs? No more can salt water yield fresh. [In our passage, he offers the two images of a spring and a fig tree to balance the horse and ship images at the beginning of the argument. The untamed tongue emits fire that stains, but the bridled tongue should offer fresh water that nourishes. Just as a freshwater spring does not emit brackish salty water — which is literally “poison” to those who drink it (v. 8) — so also should the tongue of a teacher avoid duplicity.
Although the argument of 3:1-12 can stand on its own, it relates to other issues of speech ethics throughout the epistle. Luke Timothy Johnson has shown that the proper use of speech runs through James as a theme.[3] Do not make self-justifying claims of being tempted by God (1:13); do not flatter the rich (2:3-6); do not make empty promises (2:16) or superficial claims (2:18); do not judge or slander another member of the community (4:11); do not boast of future plans without regard for God’s will (4:13); and do not grumble against one another (5:9). Finally, the concluding exhortations (5:12-18) delineate various human conditions and their proper responses through speech, whether prayer, singing or confession. Though too powerful to be tamed, the tongue can be harnessed and put to proper use for the health of the community.]

Introduction
“Sticks and Stones can break my bones … but words can never hurt me.” Is that little bit of proverbial wisdom true? I get the point, in that it tries to put words into a larger context. Yet, taken as it is, it is not true. Words have a way of coming back to us, casting a shadow over our lives.
If you think of my name, you might imagine a little song I heard often as a child. Georgie Porgie…” and you know the rest. You might have also guessed “George of the Jungle.” It is not like I have the greatest last name either! I grew up embarrassed by my name.
All of us have experienced the power of words. What we say can embarrass us, hurt us or others and devastate relationships.
At a local restaurant, you have been chatting with a close friend about your relationship with an annoying coworker. Suddenly you notice one of that coworker's closest friends is seated at a nearby table. How much of your gossip did she hear?
During a text conversation with your best friend, you vent about your spouse's recent detachment and other shortcomings. A few minutes later, in a sudden moment of panic, you grab your phone to confirm that text indeed was sent to your friend and not your spouse!
While chatting after worship about a recent decision by the church board with which you disagree, you notice another church member who appears to have been listening intently. Immediately you begin reviewing the conversation in your mind, hoping you did not say anything they might find insulting.
Once leaving our lips, our words are out of our control. You cannot get toothpaste back in the tube. The bell cannot be un-rung. The train has left the station. Our words may not "go viral," but they may "go virus," infecting more people than we would care to know.
We know this all too well. Despite all our accomplishments in adulthood, a parent's careless words spoken 30 years ago still sting. The uninformed opinion of a teacher still affects your decisions even though you have a successful career. Although others have told you how gifted you are, a bad performance review -- formal or informal -- still echoes years later. Those words are amplified in our hearts without the aid of a microphone.

Application
Our culture is becoming increasingly harsh. We see in social media, where I am confident that people would not write much of what they do if the person were right there in front of them.
Sadly, this means that the church can overlap with the culture. It can become increasingly mean in the way it handles differences.

The Three-Filter Test
Right now, in the 2016 Presidential race, I can think of at least one person whom I wish would use this text! (I did not say it, but the name is Donald Trump).
One time-honored way of dealing with gossip is called the “three-filter test.” Some say it dates all the way back to Socrates.
• The first filter is Truth: Are you absolutely sure the statement is true?
• The second filter is Goodness: Does the statement say something good about another person?
• The third filter is Usefulness: Is the statement useful in some way?
It is not necessary for the conditions of all three filters to be fulfilled. For example, a statement may be true and useful but may still say something bad about another person. While it could hurt the other person, there may still be some value in saying it.
The three-filter test is most useful when none of the three conditions is fulfilled. Then it is easy to discard the statement as mere gossip.

The importance of our inner lives
James shifts metaphors to illustrate that our words tell the world something about our hearts. Like the fruit tells us about the tree, and the water downstream tells us about the source, our words say something about us. When we have assumed a teaching role, our words not only represent us, but our whole group, which sometimes is all of Christianity. Before posting, sharing, tweeting or chatting, we need to measure our words to be sure we are representing Christ well.
The truth is that if we want to have any control over the tongue, we need to pay attention to our inner lives from which either blessing or cursing can come forth. Does the inner spring in our lives gush with both fresh and brackish water? (v. 11). Can a fig tree yield olives? Does salt water spontaneously turn fresh? (v. 12). No, what is inside a person determines the kind of fruit that comes out in the form of words and deeds.
If we are going to be the kind of people who use words wisely, then we have to first cultivate an inner life that sees everyone as a friend created in God's image. We need a vision of life that does not put us at the center of the universe, but rather centers on God and God's purposes. The God who spoke the word of creation and sent the Word to become flesh in his own Son, urges us to choose the kind of words that reflect his character, life and love.

Speaking the truth in love
Back to our original question: Is there such a thing as good gossip, particularly in the Christian community?
Dietrich Bonhoeffer, in Life Together, wrote about the importance that Christians practice restraint in the use of their tongues:

“It must be a decisive rule of every Christian fellowship that each individual is prohibited from saying much that occurs to him. [I am thinking of a clergy colleague who, in his last Administrative Council meeting at the church, compared himself to Moses and the church to the complaining and rebellious Israelites. Here is something that might have occurred to him, but probably best left unsaid.] This prohibition does not include the personal word of advice and guidance. … But to speak about a brother covertly is forbidden, even under the cloak of help and good will; for it is precisely in the guise that the spirit of hatred among brothers always creeps in when it is seeking to create mischief.” (Dietrich Bonhoeffer)

The proper use of the tongue will result in beneficial fruits:

“Where the discipline of the tongue is practiced right from the beginning, each individual will make a matchless discovery. He will be able to cease from constantly scrutinizing the other person, judging him, condemning him, putting him in his particular place where he can gain ascendency over him and thus doing violence to him as a person. Now he can allow the brother to exist as a completely free person, as God made him to be. His view expands and, to his amazement, for the first time he sees, shining above his brethren, the richness of God’s creative glory. God did not make this person as I would have made him. He did not give him to me as a brother for me to dominate and control, but in order that I might find above him the Creator.”

Conclusion
The words of a parent who reminded us we were still loved after getting dumped by our first boyfriend or girlfriend are remembered. The words of a mentor encouraging us to take that next step because they see our talent and ability, still prod us along. The words "I love you" from the lips of our spouse still have the ability to make our day.
 As the people of God, we are called to be those people for someone else. 
When we come together on a Sunday morning to praise God, unite our voices in prayer and together confess our faith through creeds and affirmations, we are using our tongues in service to God.
After worship, when we encourage one another over a cup of coffee in the fellowship hall, tell our story to someone in our small group who can learn from our mistakes, or pause to pray with a friend who is struggling we are sharing a blessing. Nevertheless, it does not stop there.
When we compliment the work of someone we supervise at the office, when we offer a word of encouragement to someone who is supervising us, when we leave a note of appreciation for our waiter at the restaurant, when we compliment the youth in our church or neighborhood -- when we do this, we are living our calling.
Our tongues are powerful tools. We must use our words wisely.



[1] Systematic Theology Volume 3, 246.
[2] Pannenberg, Systematic Theology Volume 2, 208.
[3](Luke Timothy Johnson, The Letter of James [AB 37A; New York: Doubleday, 1995], 255).