Showing posts with label Gospel of John. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gospel of John. Show all posts

Sunday, March 22, 2015

John 12:20-33

Year B
5th Sunday in Lent
March 22, 2015
Title: Losing Your Life

Going deeper

John 12:20-33 (NRSV)

[John 12:20-36 tells the story of the preparation for the Passover, with the specific theme of the coming hour. This passage is the climax of Chapters 11-12, as the hour of glorification is near. From the opening, the reader is aware that something different and significant is happening. Rather than Jesus' offering a sign to the world (2:11, 4:54), the appearance of the non-Jews who seek him is a sign to Jesus that "his hour" of glorification is drawing near (12:23). First, it signals the close of the evangelist's account of Jesus' ministry. From this point on, Jesus will offer no more signs to the public. Second, this passage serves as a bridge to Jesus' final discourse to his disciples and to the passion narrative. While the opening of this scene suggests that a number of characters will play important roles (Jesus, the Greeks, Philip and Andrew), the dialogue that John wants to highlight is between Jesus and the Jewish crowd.]

Jesus, in verses 20-26, offers a short discourse on the meaning of his death and discipleship. Verses 20-22 concern the coming of the Greeks.] 20 Now among those who went up to worship at the festival were some Greeks. 21 They came to Philip, who was from Bethsaida in Galilee, and said to him, “Sir, we wish to see [to believe in] Jesus.” 22 Philip went and told Andrew; then Andrew and Philip went and told Jesus. [The Greeks of this story do not receive further mention. The reader receives no indication that the Greek inquirers' request is ever granted. Some scholars suggest that these "Greeks" are also a kind of final temptation to Jesus before he heads down the passion path. Might these Greeks not represent the lure of a Gentile mission that Jesus could turn toward at this time, instead of continuing his clashing mission among "the Jews" and its tragic outcome?  There is little textual evidence for this tempting interpretation, however. This passage indicates that Jesus no longer has a place in Judaism - the gospel will now take root in the Hellenistic world. The highlighting of Philip and Andrew is due to their non-Jewish names, and the mention of Bethsaida in Galilee may also be important, for Galilee was often associated with Gentiles. His coming, crucifixion and resurrection will open the door fully to non-Jews to believe in the Lord God of Israel, and John is dramatically foreshadowing this shift here. Jesus has already said that other sheep are welcomed into the fold as part of his universalism.  The appearance of Gentiles suggests now is the time to lay down his life. The appearance of some Greeks seeking him doubtless prefigures the spread of the good news about him beyond Judaism. These Greeks were "God-fearers," who could not partake of the Passover lamb.  It is evidence of true religious searching.  Following on the heels of the Pharisees' disgruntled observation, "Look, the world has gone after him" (v.19), John notes the arrival of "some Greeks" who voice their desire to "see Jesus." The fact that these "Greeks" have apparently gone up to worship at the temple during the Passover festival and that they are interested in "seeing" the now notable Jesus indicates that these figures are either "God fearers" (Torah observers but not circumcised) or full proselytes to Judaism.  Instead of confronting Jesus directly, the Greeks first seek out Philip to pull some strings. Philip in turn consults with Andrew before the two of them finally go to Jesus.] 23 Jesus answered them, “The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified. [Although the Greeks themselves disappear from sight, they usher in a new age. John is concerned that if these Greeks must "see" to believe, they then had better "see" the right Jesus. Those who want to "see" Jesus most often "see" him only through his reputation as a great teacher, healer, and miracle worker. At this "hour" of his "glorification," however, Jesus is revealed (again) as enduring suffering and death if his mission is to be undimmed.] 24 Very truly, I tell you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains just a single grain; but if it dies, it bears much fruit. [This verse is the parable of the seed that dies.  This verse is the first part of a series of sayings that form commentary on the theme of death and life.  The point is that Jesus is speaking of death as the means of gaining life.  The point stresses the productivity of the seed.  In context, it refers to Jesus' death through death is fruit borne.  Although this parable has some similarities with the seed parables in the synoptics and with I Corinthians 15:35ff, it is not exactly the same.  Jesus illustrates the fruitfulness of his death.  Jesus' death is necessary in order to bring abundant missionary fruit.  Death, as the carefully chosen image of the grain of wheat illustrates, brings forth life, not only for Jesus, but also for all those who follow and serve him. Although Jesus never addresses the Greeks directly in response, he does offer yet another lesson on discipleship. Like himself, his disciples must be willing to follow God's plan to the end, even death itself, if they are to "bear fruit."] 25 Those who love their life lose it, and those who hate their life in this world will keep it for eternal life. [The concern here is the theme of living and hating life. The disciples are confronted with the necessity of discipleship even unto death.  Death is not the end, but the perfection of life. Jesus refers to his death, and now he refers to the death disciples of Jesus must experience. John offers his version of the idea that whoever would save their lives will lose them/whoever would lose their lives will find them teaching, a truth found in all four gospels (Mark 8:35; Matthew 16:25; Luke 9:24). The call to discipleship is a call to suffer, sacrifice, even die for others to live as God lives, to live as Jesus did.  This unexpected nature of messiahship is a messiahship that embraces servanthood and dying is not an easy pill to swallow, not even for Jesus himself. This hour refers to a return to the Father through crucifixion, resurrection, and ascension.  He is ready, resisting the temptation to be saved from this hour.  The implied answer to the Greeks from Jesus is no, but only because Jesus must first undergo death before salvation can be brought to the Greeks.  Glorification because the death is the fullness of saving power that is universal in scope.  Jesus draws attention to the meaning of the hour, given to all people, death bearing fruit to all.]26 Whoever serves me must follow me, and where I am, there will my servant be also. Whoever serves me, the Father will honor. [This verse concerns the following of Jesus.  Parallel to Mk 8:35.  The reward for following Jesus is to be with him and to be honored by the Father.  The verse emphasizes the unity of serving and following Jesus, with the promise of Jesus' presence and of being honored by the Father.  There is a readiness to face death.  Following Jesus is taken very literally as referring to the cross.]

[Verse 27-30 concerns the hour of glorification and the heavenly voice. One finds victory in submission to the plan of God.] 27 “Now my soul is troubled. [Jesus admits that his own soul "is troubled" by the sacrifice and death that loom in his future. Now is not the time to draw back or try to sidestep the messianic future.] And what should I say—‘Father, save me from this hour’? No, it is for this reason that I have come to this hour. [We have a Gethsemane scene. Note Hebrews 5:7 referring to Jesus' agony before his death.  This account of Jesus' agony and his submission to his Father's will comes from the traditional account of the Mount of Olives.  Though the cross is the culmination of glory, it has not lost its human darkness. The verse shows Jesus fully accepting the terms of his messianic identity and readily accepting the "coming" of his hour. His obedience mirrors the call to discipleship Jesus extended to others. He refuses to try to save himself. Instead, he calls to God to "glorify your name."] 28 Father, glorify your name.” Then a voice came from heaven, “I have glorified It [in the course of the life of Jesus] , and I will glorify it again [in the resurrection and ascension].” [The prayer of Jesus is answered by the heavenly voice.  Jesus comes to terms with the hour by turning to his Father, who gives assurance of glorification. The voice from heaven responds directly to Jesus' obedience, affirming his understanding both of his identity and of his future. Here is the Johannine form of the Lord's Prayer, requesting God to do the sanctifying of the name.  Jesus' submission to God's plan is met with reassurance from the Father.  This is the first time in John that there is a voice from heaven.  There is similarity with the Synoptic baptism and transfiguration stories.  Closely associated with Jesus' death, it acknowledges Jesus as the Son.  There are two tenses to "glorify", aorist and future.] 29 The crowd standing there heard it and said that it was thunder. Others said, “An angel has spoken to him.” [The crowd's presence is noted and they become the collective foil for the remainder of the drama. While this voice is not quite a private communication with Jesus, it is decidedly not made clear to the general crowd. Though John's text suggests that all those gathered near heard something, there is considerable disagreement over what that something was. Just as for some, the message of a Suffering Servant, a crucified Christ, a mortal Messiah, was beyond the pale of their comprehension, so for some who witnessed the heavenly voice's response to Jesus' obedience, the message is impenetrable. To others, those who had listened to Jesus' teachings and heard his calls to discipleship and service, the heavenly voice sounded like that of an angel. Though they could not yet discern the whole implication of what was to come, they sensed the presence of the divine in their midst. For a great many, however, Jesus' teachings remained scrambled, turning whole notions of messianic leadership, divine power and glorification over hard and on their heads. To those who simply cannot "get it," the voice is only so much noise  the din of thunder.] 30 Jesus answered, “This voice has come for your sake, not for mine. 31 Now is the judgment of this world; now the ruler of this world will be driven out. [That the Greeks recognize what the Jews do not is the cause for the judgment of the world and the casting out of the "ruler of this world," who is Satan. John identifies the Jews as being part of Satan's world - reminiscent of the connection John has made between the Jews and Satan, or the devil, before (8:44). Judgment takes place through unbelief itself.  From where is this ruler cast out?  The verse may refer to a loss of influence over believers, thereby becoming powerless.  Pannenberg says the world as a whole has come under the tyranny of an ungodly force, the prince of this world.[1] He also says that the eschatological truth is already a present reality even if in hidden form. Thus, judgment as well as life is already present with Jesus Christ in the world.[2] Verses 31-34 concern the lifting up of Jesus and the problem of the Son of Man.  Darkness is closing in but the hour brings judgment upon the Prince of this world and life to those who follow Jesus.  The glorification of Jesus brings expulsion of the enemy.  The victorious hour of Jesus is a victory over Satan in principle; yet the working out of this victory in time and place is the gradual work of believing Christians. Jesus' death is not a sign, but the realization of God's plan.  The writer stresses the announcement of the crucifixion. ] 32 And I, when I am lifted up from the earth [on the cross and later ascent to the Father], will draw all people to myself.” [The more important and positive aspect of Jesus' hour is the salvation of believers, extended to all persons.  Triumph over the enemy and drawing people to himself are drawn together.] 33 He said this to indicate the kind of death he was to die. [It is well known that crucifixion indicates a monstrous Roman capital punishment, but to John the gruesomeness of crucifixion becomes a gracious posture of an open-armed welcome. Pannenberg says of verses 32-33 that this gospel can call the crucifixion exaltation, a statement possible only in the light of the resurrection and the return to the Father.[3] The text concludes with Jesus' revealing more of the events that make this the hour for his glorification. It is a time for judgment, a time for the Devil ("the ruler of this world") to get his due and be run out of this world. The power that can accomplish these feats, and also "draw all people" to the risen Christ, offers readers the merest hint of what the glorified Jesus will be like. His primary message here is that he will achieve this glorification through a shocking means: suffering and death. Nevertheless, his Father will raise him in glory and power.]

[This is a suitable conclusion to the public ministry of Jesus as John views it.  The crowds are the Jews, as usual deaf to the meaning of Jesus' words.  Jesus is speaking to the disciples.] 

Introduction

So why did these Greeks want to see Jesus? Why would you want to see Jesus? Are you expecting to learn something? You want to be inspired? You want to admire him? You want to congratulate him? You want to ask him some questions? How would the experience change your life?

John is making it clear that if we want to “see” or “believe” in Jesus, we need to seem him in the fulfillment of the “hour” for which he has come. The hour is the time from the Last Supper, his betrayal, his arrest, his trial before Jews and Gentiles, his execution, and his resurrection.

If you want to see or believe in him, John lets us know that there is a painful step to take.

We must be willing to look at suffering and death in different way.

            The Son of Man in Jewish writings would come in power and glory at the end of the age. That sounds quite wonderful. Yet, Jesus says the Son of Man must suffer and die.

            Are you ready to see Jesus? 

Application      

            First, to see Jesus is to believe that his death of Jesus will bear fruit. 

24 Very truly, I tell you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains just a single grain; but if it dies, it bears much fruit.27 “Now my soul is troubled. And what should I say—‘Father, save me from this hour’? No, it is for this reason that I have come to this hour. 

            Jesus fully participated in this human life. Therefore, he would have to die.

This little saying raises a painful issue for many of us. Birth and death place a limit upon our lives. This was not easy for Jesus to face. Yet, he accepted it as part of the plan of God.

There is a beautiful little story about one of the Greek gods, one that these Greeks who wanted to see Jesus would have known.  It seems that Zeus fell in love with a mortal woman.  Mercury told him, "Look, you're Zeus, you can do anything you want.  So why don't you declare a little war down in Greece, so her husband, who was a young general, will have to go off.  You can go down masquerading and make love to his wife."  Zeus thought this was a good idea, so he did it.  When he came back to the heavens, Zeus is very reflective on what the gods are missing by being immortal.  "She was saying, 'when I am young,' or 'when I am old,' or 'when I die.'  This stabs me Mercury.  We miss something Mercury.  We miss the poignancy of the transient, the sweet sadness of grasping for something we know we cannot hold." 

Yes, we have limits. However, the limit can help us see the precious quality of the time and place God has given us.

I like the way John Wesley put it on his 85th birthday:  

"I have only to say: My remnant of days I spend to his praise, who died the whole world to redeem; be they many or few, my days are his due, and they all are devoted to him." 

            Second, to see Jesus, the follower of Jesus is willing to hate their life in this world. 

25 Those who love their life lose it, and those who hate their life in this world will keep it for eternal life. 

            The early church father Tertullian wrote in 197 AD, a time when many Christians faced persecution and death at the hands of the Romans. He once said that the blood of the followers of Jesus of his time was the bait that wins people to our “school.” “We multiply whenever you mow us down.” He exaggerated a bit. Many Romans enjoyed seeing these people die, since they did not think of them as courageous. They died rather than fight, and Romans valued fighters. The Romans ridiculed them, one writer saying that Romans should kill them and see if they rise from the dead.

            However, over time, the martyrs truly became evangelists in their deaths. It happened because they saw that the values of Roman civilization led to corruption of human lives. They started looking for something new.

            On a personal level, many of us have had experiences times of forced retreat from the daily routine. Maybe it was the death of a friend or family member. Maybe it was a brush with death. Maybe it was being fired from a job you liked. Something happened, and you woke up to the reality of your life and to God. You realized what was important in your life.

Eugene Peterson writes:                                                

Suddenly, instead of mindlessly and compulsively pursing an abstraction – money, or happiness, or the elusive “good life” – the person is reduced to what is actually there, to the immediately personal – family, geography, body – and begins afresh in love and appreciation. The change is the direct consequence of forced realization of human limits. Pulled out to the limits by a God who is conditioned and confined to the reality of the human condition, the person is surprised not to be living a diminished life, but a deepened life, not a crippled life, but a zestful life. God – intensity begins to replace self-importance.[4]  

            Sometimes, in those confined places in life, when we are trapped, nowhere to escape, we are pushed close to God and to what really matters in life. For instance, it is fascinating to consider how much important biblical material was written by people in jail – by Paul in prison, by John in exile on the Island of Patmos. This reminds us also of the powerful letter that Martin Luther King Jr. wrote while he was in prison in the Birmingham jail, of the powerful novels written by Alexander Solzhenitzen while he was imprisoned in the Soviet Gulag.

            As a pastor, I have constantly been surprised by how often people will report how situations in life, situations that by all accounts ought to be terrible, turn out to be good.

            Third, to see Jesus is to see that following Jesus is what serving Jesus is all about. 

26 Whoever serves me must follow me, and where I am, there will my servant be also. Whoever serves me, the Father will honor. 

            The story is told of a little boy whose sister needed a blood transfusion.  The boy had recovered from the same disease two years before.  Her only chance for recovery was to have a transfusion from someone who had recovered from the disease.  Since the boy had the same rare blood type and had recovered from the disease, he would be the ideal donor.  The doctor asked if he would be willing to do this.  At first, the boy hesitated.  His lower lip started to tremble.  But then he said, "Sure, for my sister."  The two were wheeled into a hospital room.  They were side by side.  They did not speak, but when their eyes met, the boy smiled at his sister.  He was so healthy, while she was very pale and sickly.  The nurse put the needle into the boy's arm, and the boy's smile faded.  He watched his blood flow into the tube.  When the ordeal was almost over, his voice slightly shaky, he said, "Doctor, when do I die?"  Only then did the doctor realize why the boy hesitated, and why his lip trembled.  In that brief moment, he made a great decision.[5] 

Conclusion

            Following Jesus means the pattern of all the way to the cross. Losing your life to Jesus places your life in the proper perspective. You see your life through the lens of the death and resurrection of Jesus. This allows you to see your life from the perspective of eternity. It is so easy to grasp onto that which you cannot hold forever. You will have anything here only temporarily. However, if you lose your life for Jesus, you will actually gain life. In fact, John will refer to this as abundant life.




[1] Systematic Theology Volume 2, 108.
[2] Systematic Theology Volume 3, 605.
[3] Systematic Theology Volume 2, 365.
[4] (Eugene Peterson, The Unpredictable Plant: An Explanation in Vocational Holiness, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992, p. 89.)
[5] Robert Coleman, Written in Blood. 

Monday, March 16, 2015

John 3:14-21


Year B
4th Sunday in Lent
March 15, 2015
Title: John 3:16 Reconsidered
youtube.com/watch?v=KwG0bXhegrw

Going deeper
John 3: 14-21
John 3:1-21 is the discourse of Jesus with Nicodemus in Jerusalem, the first of the discourses in this gospel. 

14 And just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, [Numbers 21:4-9, where the reason was to bring healing to the people who had recently received a bite from snakes]

            One way to start viewing the John passage in its larger context is to imagine there is a hyperlink in verse 14 that jumps you back to Numbers 21:4-9. We are going to jump to that story for a moment, but unlike the usual Internet reading practice, we are going to return to the text we started with, and thanks to Numbers, we will have a better understanding of what Jesus was getting at in John 3:16.

            The Numbers story finds the people of Israel in the wilderness between Egypt and Canaan, after the exodus. Their route requires them to skirt the land of Edom. This detour makes the Israelites cranky and it brings up complaints they have raised to Moses before:  

“Our slavery in Egypt was better than this. We’re going to die out here in the wilderness.”  

Then, in a rant, that does not even make sense, they add,  

“We’ve got no food and water, and this food we have is miserable!”  

They complained not only against Moses, but also against God. It is at least the fourth occasion, and in each preceding time, God addressed their complaints in some way. Nevertheless, here they are at it again.

      At this point, Numbers becomes a story about serpents. I suppose I have a fear of snakes. I do not like to admit it, but I do. Snakes can be beautiful, but I prefer furry animals to snakes. Of course, the intertwined snakes that form the symbol of healing in the American Medical Association ought to remind us that healing often involves pain and salve. This time, according to the Numbers 21 account, God sent poisonous serpents among them, who bit them, and many of the people died. This brought the rest quickly back to Moses with the admission that they had sinned against him and against God, and they pleaded with Moses to intervene with God on their behalf. When Moses did so, God told him to fashion a serpent out of bronze and place it on a pole. This snake on a staff came from God. God instructed that anyone whom a living serpent bit should look at the bronze one on the pole. When they did so, they would recover and live.

so must [that is, by divine necessity, the plan of God] the Son of Man be lifted up,[in offering his life as a sacrifice, making possible a new reality for others] 15 that whoever believes in him may have eternal life. [This entire passage discusses begetting, birth from above, all of which are possible through the death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus. As Pannenberg points out, John can call the crucifixion the exaltation of the Son only in the light of the resurrection and the return to the Father.[1] The certainty of his work of salvation is founded on God’s plan, the goal of which is the giving of life to believers. In a discussion of the metaphorical language involved in the resurrection of Jesus, Pannenberg stresses that it refers to a real event. The new eschatological life, eternal life, is life in the full sense of the term, in comparison with each earthly life is such only with reservation.[2]]

16 “For God so loved the world that he gave his only [and beloved, the only-begotten and uniquely loved Son, intimately united to the Father and supremely loved] Son,

so that everyone who believes in him may not perish.[snatching people from destruction] but may have eternal life. In the classical doctrine of the Trinity a careful distinction to make is that between the processions and the sending, whether of the Son, as here, or the Spirit.[3] Pannenberg will point out that rarely does the New Testament look at Jesus as judge. In fact, this passage states that Jesus came into the world to save it, not condemn it. Jesus will not personally condemn anyone, because he has come into the world to save it. Yet, his word and person are the standard by which the future judgment takes place.[4] The background of this passage may well be the near-sacrifice of Isaac by Abraham in Genesis 22:2, 12. John has distilled the gospel into a simple statement. The complexity of the heavenly and earthly identity of the Son combines with the simplicity and power of divine love. He has summed up the Christian message of redemption. The plan of the cross has its root in the immeasurable love of God for the world. The Son is the most cherished gift God had to give. John makes known the greatness of the act of God in the Incarnation and in the mission of bridging the chasm between God and world.  God has revealed this love in the historical mission of the Son, to the extent of the cross. The purpose of this giving of the Son is life for others. God bridges the gap caused by human alienation and sin, bringing reconciliation.

In discussions of the Trinity in the early church, the East followed the terminology of John closely, distinguishing between the “generation” of the Son here and the “procession” of the Spirit in John 15:26.[5] In a discussion of the divine essence and existence, Pannenberg finds here that the Son reveals the existence of the Father, and by the sending of the Son, the Father reveals the divine essence, that is, divine love.[6] The sending of the Son into the world, that we might live through him, declares the love of God for us.[7] As Pannenberg interprets the infinity and holiness of God, he sees the sending of the Son to save the world aiming at the bringing of the world into the sphere of the divine holiness.[8] In contrast to Barth, Pannenberg will stress that the creation of the world is an expression of the love of God. The love with which God loved the world in the sending of the Son does not differ in kind from the fatherly love the Creator for the creatures God made.[9] The notion of sending here refers to the passion and death of Jesus, not to his birth.[10] As Pannenberg sees it, the whole earthly path of the Son was from the outset a path to the crucifixion of Jesus according to the providence of God, which we can see here, even if it simply says that God “gave” the Son out of love for the world so that those who believe should have eternal life. Bultmann would limit the giving here to “gave up to death,” but he thinks we can take it more broadly as a reference to the sending of the Son to the cosmos, though with the special nuance that God “gifted” the Son to the world.[11]

 but may have eternal life. 17 “Indeed, God did not send the Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. When we combine verses 16-17, Pannenberg wants to stress that the saving work of the Son was the purpose of the Father sending the Son.[12] He will stress that the sending of the Son for incarnation in the one man Jesus had concern for others as well. God sent the Son into the world to save it. Thus, the goal of the sending of the Son is one we find in others.[13] We should also note that such notions of sending presuppose the pre-existence of the Son.[14]

18 Those who believe in him are not condemned; but those who do not believe are condemned already, because they have not believed in the name of the only Son of God. We have here an example of realized eschatology, for judgment reserved for the future is already present. Pannenberg points out that the work of the Spirit and that of the exalted Lord are largely parallel and seem interchangeable in content, comparing convincing the cosmos of sin in verses 18-20 and 16:8-11.[15]  God's desire is to save, not judge.  Unbelief brings self-condemnation.  In spite of the unbelief Jesus met with, Jesus in this gospel is always urging people to believe.  Though there is present judgment, this does not rule out a future one.  However, note that judgment is not God's intent.  Thus, unbelief becomes self-condemnation. By taking this decision, humanity deprives itself of the last possibility of escaping from the realm of death. However, the Johannine theology can help to avoid too naïve ideas of the last judgment. It is nothing but the divine acknowledgment of the condition brought about by human decision, and the merciless disclosure of an existence long since vowed to destruction, already a victim of death.

In these final verses, John uses the metaphor of light and darkness to express realities concerning the revelation of God. 19And this is the judgment, that the light has come into the world, and people loved darkness rather than light because their deeds were evil. Thus, the reason for judgment is that people prefer darkness. We have personal responsibility. God has done everything possible to save people from judgment. 20 For all who do evil hate the light and do not come to the light, so that their deeds may not be exposed. Jesus is the light. People who reject the messenger from God are foreign to God. The light of revelation falls upon them. Their deeds or unbelief unmasks them for what they are. Their hatred comes from a general attitude of corruptness. 21 But those who do what is true come to the light, so that it may be clearly seen that their deeds have been done in God.” People prefer to remain blind to the truth. People would rather kill truth tellers than listen to what they have to say. 

Introduction – Have John 3:16 on screen

One of the themes during the season of Lent is the emphasis upon the Father giving the Son so that humanity might have life. We find this focus supremely in John 3:16.

You have seen it on signs at NFL games. On T-shirts. Even on quarterback Tim Tebow's eyeblack. John 3:16. The most famous verse in the Bible, one that many people call "the gospel in a nutshell." In a nighttime meeting with a Pharisee named Nicodemus, Jesus says, "For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life." Author Max Lucado calls this verse "an alphabet of grace, a table of contents to the Christian hope, each word a safe-deposit box of jewels."

Precious stuff, no doubt about it.

So why are we putting such treasures on the bottom of bright yellow shopping bags?

At the low-cost, "fast-fashion" clothing store called Forever 21, teenage girls fill yellow bags with the latest fashions. Discreetly printed on the bottom of those bags is John 3:16. No Scripture verse, just the reference. According to Forever 21, the inscription is "a demonstration of the owners' faith." David Rupert is intrigued by these bags. On a website called The High Calling, he admits that most teenage girls will never notice the verse as they fill the bags with skimpy clothes. He wonders if the Scripture reference really makes a difference to anyone. He likes the fact that customers have to discover it, however -- it is not in anyone's face.

Forever 21 is not alone. A number of companies with Christian-based values are trying to attach the gospel message to their products. The California hamburger chain called In-N-Out prints John 3:16 on its drink cups.

I have respect for the companies who do such creative witnessing. Of course, one might ask: "Do they work?" Further, what do we mean by work? Do they help people become followers of Jesus Christ to transform the world, which is the mission of the United Methodist Church and the mission of Cross~Wind? Perhaps, most would answer: "We leave the results with God." In any case, we would like to think that these citations cause people to open their Bibles and read the verses. Alternatively, is their impact completely fleeting? A moment of recognition, followed by business-as-usual? In most cases, these verses are going to catch a customer's eye for just a second before being crumpled up and thrown in the trash.

Are they really nothing more than IN-N-OUT Scripture?

Something more is needed

Reading a Bible verse is not going to do it.

The New York Times, known for its bulky issues and involved analysis, has included a two-page summary of the articles contained in the paper. Management explained that they made this change to address two complaints they were hearing. One was from readers who said they did not have enough time to read the fuller articles. The other was from readers who said that because there was so much in each issue, they often overlooked the articles about which they really cared.

            One observer, however, says the change is also evidence of a larger trend in our world, one that may not be for the good. Writing in The Atlantic, Nicholas Carr, who watches technology, business and culture, said that what drove the new feature was how the Internet is rewiring not only our reading habits, but also the circuits in our brain that have to do with cognition. For him, the Internet not only supplies stuff to think about but also shapes the very process of thought. Carr notes that a recent study by scholars from University College London shows that as people view material online, they usually skim rather than read deeply. They hop from one source to another and rarely return to any one they have already visited. Generally, they read no more than one or two pages of an article or book before they leap to another site. Users of the Internet “power browse” from place to place. They avoid what we traditionally describe as reading. Carr quotes Maryanne Wolf, a developmental psychologist at Tufts University, who worries that the kind of reading the Internet promotes, which aims at “efficiency” and “immediacy,” may be withering away our capacity for the kind of deep reading books call for. When we read online, Wolf says, we tend to become “mere decoders of information” who do not engage our ability to make “the rich mental connections that form when we read deeply.” He notices that even has difficulty reading a regular book because of what he perceives as this influence of the Internet.

            His central conclusion is that sustained, undistracted reading of a book opens up quiet spaces of contemplation in our lives. We make our associations, draw our own inferences and analogies, and receive our own insights. As Maryanne Wolf noted, deep reading is indistinguishable from deep thinking.

            Well, there is more to the article. However, to summarize (!): The New York Times has taken to summarizing articles possibly because 1) they are afraid people just do not want to read so much anymore, and 2) it is possible that the Internet is responsible for the decline in deep reading.

            Quite honestly, I am skeptical that a piece of technology can do as much as Mr. Carr suggests. However, he did make me wonder about our reading of the Bible. We need to learn to read the Bible in a way that leads to openness and willingness for the Bible to surprise us. I want to focus our attention upon John 3:16. Yet, when something is as familiar and known as is this passage, we may experience the temptation to tell ourselves that we already know it, and move on. We may forget that a passage is worthy of some deep reading, quiet space, and contemplation. In some ways, John 3:16 is like the Mona Lisa of the Christian message. [Hold up the Bible.] We cannot memorize this entire book. [Open to the Gospel of John.] Few of us could memorize this entire Gospel. However, we can memorize this verse. In fact, I hope you will memorize it, and then, engage in some deep reading and thinking. That will require us to pause and reflect upon the beauty of its message.  

Video

I have a video to share with you. It can be a way to lead us to a deep reading of John 3:16. As I have reflected upon this, a deep reading of the Bible is a form of prayer. Please watch this youtube video youtube.com/watch?v=KwG0bXhegrw in a prayerful way. 

Application

            This passage refers to eternal life, a metaphor John uses for living now in the unending presence of God. In what ways might John 3:16 summarize the Christian message?

            First, eternal life brings initial joy.

            Some people experience this as a one-time, bursting experience of newness, like a conversion experience. William James, psychologist and philosopher from around the 1900’s, wrote a wonderful book called Varieties of Religious Experience, and used the example of a shed roof in a snowstorm. Snow builds up until the stress on the roof reaches the final point beyond which it will not remain intact. Then one flake of snow, almost imperceptible in and of itself, acts as the final weight and the roof collapses. Therefore, in conversion, any life experience may be that last snowflake. Perhaps it is an illness, or a sunrise, or an inspiring worship experience, or an addiction which has finally become too much. Then the Holy Spirit breaks in. For other people it may be more subtle, a slowly developing realization that Christ is real, that God does indeed work within us to heal and give life. Then in a moment of realization, one accepts Christ.

            Second, eternal life brings stability in life.

We live in a world of suffering and struggle, as well as laughter and goodness. Life has its high points and its low points. Sometimes, I may wander way off course. Yet, what is stable in the love God has for this world. Such awareness can help us, as people who must live in this world in which we encounter so much darkness, to embrace this world with love. Receiving the assurance of the love of God for this world can help us, when it is most difficult, to have the faith and courage to embrace this world with love.

            Third, eternal life means something after death.

God’s many mansions wait. On Easter, we shall look further at this promise. For now, this passage assures us that death is only the entryway into a land of love. A rather long poem by Wordsworth, Ode 536, called “Intimations of Immortality, is well worth meditating upon, at least for those of us who like poetry. One memorable phrase is this: “Trailing clouds of glory do we come from God who is our home.” To die is to go home.  

Conclusion

            I trust that you have had the joy of feeling the warm embrace of the love of God, the assurance of that love regardless of circumstances, and the confidence of eternal life with God.

 



[1] Systematic Theology Volume 2, 365.
[2] Systematic Theology Volume 2, 347.
[3] Pannenberg, Systematic Theology Volume 1, 305.
[4] Systematic Theology Volume 3, 614.
[5] Pannenberg, Systematic Theology Volume 1, 305.
[6] Systematic Theology Volume 1, 358.
[7] Systematic Theology Volume 3, 183.
[8] Systematic Theology Volume 1, 399.
[9] Systematic Theology Volume 2, 144.
[10] Systematic Theology Volume 2, 301.
[11] Systematic Theology Volume 2, 397, 438, 444.
[12] Systematic Theology volume 2, 441.
[13] Systematic Theology Volume 2, 320.
[14] Systematic Theology Volume 2, 369.
[15] Systematic Theology Volume 2, 450.

Tuesday, May 20, 2014

John 14:15-21


John 14:15-21 has the theme of Jesus promising to his disciples the abiding presence of the Holy Spirit. Jesus begins with saying that love of Jesus will mean that they will keep his commandments. Jesus is asserting his right to have them love him and obey him, even as does the Lord in the Old Testament. While love is important throughout the New Testament, only in John do we find the object of love to be Jesus. Then, Jesus will ask the Father, and the Father will give them another Advocate, to be with them forever. The Advocate is also the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him, all of which suggests the strangeness of the world to those who love Jesus, for they know him, because he abides with them. He will also be in them. Pannenberg stresses that here the Spirit is not present to believers in the way the Spirit will be given later. [1]  Barth stresses that the Spirit gives instruction to Christians in a way that never becomes identical with their own spirits, so to speak. The Holy Spirit is superior to us as believers. As our teacher and leader, the Spirit is in us, but in a way that the Spirit remains Lord of our lives. For him, the entire notion of Paraclete in this passage is relevant to this discussion. He notes the difference in the notion here of “the Spirit of truth.” For Barth, God is establishing and executing the divine claim to lordship over us by this immediate presence. [2] "Paraclete" means advocate, intercessor, counselor, protector, and supporter.  There is a close parallel between the work of the Spirit and that of Jesus. Barth says this word refers to a calling, summoning, inviting, demanding, admonishing, and encouraging, an address that both corrects and comforts. The Spirit will be for the community and individual Christian the great paraclete. It describes the Spirit as the mediator, advocate, and spokesperson of Jesus Christ to the community of believers. The Spirit speaks both of Christ and for Christ, as the representative of the cause of Christ, seeking to make the cause of the community and the individual to become the cause of Christ. The Spirit sees to it that neither individual followers nor the community forgets Christ. [3] Pannenberg opines that John distinguishes more sharply than does Paul the Son and Spirit. Here, the Spirit is the “other Advocate” whom the Father will send in the name of Jesus. [4] He offers the opinion that the material difference between the types of statement regarding the giving of the Spirit is not great. After all, in each case both Father and Son work together in sending the Spirit, whether it be that the Father sends the Spirit at the request and in the name of the Son or that the risen Lord pours out the Spirit whom he has received from the Father. Regardless, he points out that the purpose of the sending is to continue the work of revealing Jesus. The Spirit glorifies Jesus as the Son of the Father by teaching us to recognize the revelation of the Father in the words and work of Jesus.[5] Pannenberg says that in this passage we see that the Holy Spirit is present to the church through the glorifying of Jesus Christ as the one whom the Father sent. For him, this passage suggests an immediacy of individuals to Jesus Christ that the Holy Spirit brings. [6] Later, he makes the point that the risen Christ will be with his disciples to the end of the world, though he will argue that this presence is through the Lord’s Supper and the Easter event. [7]  Further, as John continues, Jesus will not leave them orphaned. In Phaedo 116a Plato has the followers of Socrates becoming orphans upon his death. Jesus is coming to them. Soon, the world will no longer see Jesus because it does not have the spiritual insight to see. However, the disciples will see him. This means the world will always feel somewhat strange for those who love Jesus, obey his commandments, and in whom Jesus lives. Since he lives, they also will live. “On that day,” a reference to Easter, they will know that Jesus is in the Father, and they will be in him, and Jesus will be in them. Pannenberg views it as a decisive step in the train of thought in John that Jesus himself, by the work of the Spirit, is with his own, being “in” them as they are “in” him. [8] The people who have his commandments and keep them are those who love him. The Father will love those who love Jesus. Further, Jesus will love them and reveal himself to them.

To Raymond Brown, John offers a profound reinterpretation of the post-resurrection period and directs us to the real gift of this period, which is union with Jesus. The appearances are not an end in themselves. They initiate and point to a deeper type of presence. Even in Matthew 28:20, the risen Jesus says, “I am with you always until the end of time.” Barth says that world history, having attained its goal in Christ and in his death, cannot continue as though nothing had happened. His community, Christians, is now present in the world as witnesses to Christ. Yet, God does not leave them to their own devices. They cannot be without Christ in the world. [9] Barth further points out that Easter, Ascension, Pentecost, and the second coming are, in this passage, a single event: “I am coming to you.” It suggests a foreshortening of perspective. The event of Easter and the second coming, with the intervening history of the community under the present power of the Holy Spirit, are different moments of one event. For him, those scholars, like Schweitzer and Weiss, who go down the path of “thoroughgoing eschatology,” are quite wrong. He sees no need to suppose that there was unforeseen delay in the return of Christ, or that hope in it was repeatedly deferred, or that primitive Church, or Jesus himself, were disillusioned or mistaken on the subject in consequence of an exaggerated enthusiasm. He thinks one should condemn such a view from the outset. He discusses this within the context of Jesus being Lord of time, and thus, not subject to human experiences of time. [10]

Barth discusses the notion of Jesus as victor. He thinks it quite natural to wonder whether the notion of a new age in which being reconciled to God is not an illusion. The message of the coming of the new age and a new humanity is stranger than that of the passing of the old. He wonders whether the only option is a pure, supra-temporal, transcendent future to which one can only look forward with longing. Therefore, one would agree in practice that it has not yet arrived and that the positive declaration of the word of grace would have no validity here and now. Yet, he does not think “we” can dispose of the declaration so easily. For him, the word of grace says that humanity is already this new humanity. It speaks of the eternal future of this new humanity as irrupting into the present, of the coming of the new humanity here and now, disrupting the “peaceful and merry life in fellowship within the present” that humanity now has. Its validity is because this word is spoken in Jesus Christ, and thus, “Because I live, you shall live also.” For Barth, this focus on Christ makes it distinct from all illusions. Human “realism” is shown to be an illusion.[11] He thinks the phrase is the right order, in that the Christian community exists as Christ exists. It exists only as he exists. Therefore, the being of the community is a dimension of the being of Christ as well. It belongs to Christ and is the property of Christ. Christ is the source of its life and existence. It has no option but to exist in faith in Christ love for Christ, and hope in Christ. It exists as Christ exists, for Christ does not exist without the Christian community. [12]




[1] (Systematic Theology, Volume 1, 267)
[2] (Church Dogmatics, I.1 [12.1] 454)
[3] (Church Dogmatics IV.2 [64.4] 326)
[4] (Systematic Theology, Volume 1, 270)
[5] (Systematic Theology, Volume 3, 5)
[6] (Systematic Theology, Volume 3, 134)
[7] (ibid., p. 423)
[8] (Systematic Theology, Volume 3, 16)
[9] (Church Dogmatics, IV.2 [64.4] 326)
[10] (ibid., III.2 [47.1], 497)
[11] (Church Dogmatics IV.3 [69.3] 249)
[12] (ibid., IV.3 [72.1] 754)